-
McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000)
0.03
0.03076822 = product of:
0.06153644 = sum of:
0.06153644 = product of:
0.12307288 = sum of:
0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12307288 = score(doc=5356,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.5-18
-
Svenonius, E.: Directions for research in indexing, classification, and cataloging (1981)
0.03
0.025122147 = product of:
0.050244294 = sum of:
0.050244294 = product of:
0.10048859 = sum of:
0.10048859 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10048859 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper speculates on directions for research in the field of bibliographical control, where bibliographical control is taken to include indexing, classification, and cataloging. The approach taken is to consider questions in the field that need answering. The position taken is that while concerns of a how-to-do-it nature drive this field's research, which is of an evaluative or developmental nature, there is a strong need for this research to be backed by basic theoretical research
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic entities and their uses (2018)
0.02
0.02220505 = product of:
0.0444101 = sum of:
0.0444101 = product of:
0.0888202 = sum of:
0.0888202 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0888202 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.8, S.711-724
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=5612,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.5-40
-
Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.1, S.3-24
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.01
0.0133230295 = product of:
0.026646059 = sum of:
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.01
0.0133230295 = product of:
0.026646059 = sum of:
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986)
0.01
0.0133230295 = product of:
0.026646059 = sum of:
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1986) no.3, S.3-21
