-
Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000)
0.06
0.055991102 = product of:
0.111982204 = sum of:
0.111982204 = sum of:
0.07692055 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07692055 = score(doc=191,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.37709895 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Tillett, B.B.: FRBR and cataloging for the future (2004)
0.04
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = product of:
0.17585503 = sum of:
0.17585503 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17585503 = score(doc=5854,freq=16.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.86212003 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The conceptual model known as "FRBR" (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) reminds us of the basic elements in describing materials in the bibliographic universe, the inter-relationships, and the fundamental user tasks that we are trying to address when we create library catalogs. This model provides a new perspective on cataloging that should influence the design of future systems, cataloging codes, and cataloging practices. This paper explores current activities to utilize the FRBR model within cataloging principles, cataloging codes, and cataloging systems, and offers questions, visions, and suggests some next steps.
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993)
0.03
0.034756403 = product of:
0.06951281 = sum of:
0.06951281 = product of:
0.13902561 = sum of:
0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13902561 = score(doc=575,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.3/4, S.3-38
-
Tillett, B.B.: Problems and solutions in cataloging electronic resources (2000)
0.03
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = product of:
0.12434828 = sum of:
0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12434828 = score(doc=6461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 6461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kurth, M.; Tillett, B.B.: ¬An interview with Barbara B. Tillett (2001)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=5433,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5433, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5433)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Barbara B. Tillett discusses her career, including her roles as Director, Integrated Library System Program Office, and Chief, Cataloging Policy and Support Office, at the Library of Congress, and her work as a researcher in the area of bibliographic relationships. Topics include the following: current ILS functionality, benefits, and losses; LC's activities in digital futures planning; development of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records; her role in the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, her part in writing proposals and responses to proposals sent to JSC, and JSC initiatives of the past few years; her work in IFLA and other international organizations and projects; the possible development of a connection between existing international authority files; and other aspects of the emerging internationalization in library catalogs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.3, S.3-30
-
Tillett, B.B.: AACR2 and metadata : library opportunities in the global semantic Web (2003)
0.02
0.01884161 = product of:
0.03768322 = sum of:
0.03768322 = product of:
0.07536644 = sum of:
0.07536644 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07536644 = score(doc=5510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.101-119
-
Tillett, B.B.: ¬A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (1991)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=6686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A bibliographic relationship is an association between two or more bibliographic items or works. In an effort to provide the theoretical base for a conceptual model of the library catalog, past and future, the bibliographic relationship is examined here in detail. In this first of a series of reports, a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships is derived from an analysis of cataloging rules and types of bibliographic items.
-
Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships (2001)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The realm of conceptual modeling of the bibliographic universe presents another view of the theoretical foundations of bibliographic relationships as reflected in cataloging rules and practices. Linking devices used to indicate bibliographic relationships in past and present catalogs will continue to evolve wich changes in technologies that are used to create catalogs.
-
Tillett, B.B.: Authority control : state of the art and new perspectives (2004)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
-
Tillett, B.B.: Numbers to identify entities (ISADN's-International Standard Authority Data Numbers) (2007)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.343-361
-
Harper, C.A.; Tillett, B.B.: Library of Congress controlled vocabularies and their application to the Semantic Web (2006)
0.01
0.0133230295 = product of:
0.026646059 = sum of:
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) nos.3/4, S.47-68
