-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.06
0.058720212 = product of:
0.117440425 = sum of:
0.117440425 = sum of:
0.07536644 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07536644 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014)
0.05
0.046997383 = product of:
0.09399477 = sum of:
0.09399477 = sum of:
0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0444101 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
0.049584668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049584668 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
-
Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021)
0.04
0.038073726 = product of:
0.07614745 = sum of:
0.07614745 = product of:
0.1522949 = sum of:
0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1522949 = score(doc=700,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to present a prototype cataloging interface, which provides easier data entry, follows the cataloger's thought process and is based on the advantages of the IFLA LRM model. The paper summarizes all stages of the conceptual design and shows how the LRM was implemented. The main purpose of the cataloging interface design is to show how a LRM-based cataloging module might look like and how it could improve the existing cataloging process.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.7, p.619-643
-
Budanovic, M.P.; Zumer, M.: ¬The catalogers' thought process : a comparison of formal and informal context (2018)
0.03
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = product of:
0.12434828 = sum of:
0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12434828 = score(doc=5180,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this article is to analyze how catalogers describe publications without cataloging tools in comparison with the current cataloging process. A total of 46 catalogers took part in the first study, a free description of monographic publications, while 30 catalogers performed original cataloging in their actual environment. A combination of observations and think-aloud protocols was used for data gathering in both studies. The focus was on Slovenian catalogers from different types and sizes of libraries. Results revealed both differences and similarities between catalogers' mental models in the respective studies.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.5/6, S.507-529
-
Zumer, M.: Dedication [to Zlata Dimec] (2004)
0.03
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = product of:
0.106584236 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 52(2014) no.3, S.343-346 (T. Brenndorfer)
- Series
- Third millennium cataloging
-
Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2 : usability evaluation (2021)
0.02
0.021981878 = product of:
0.043963756 = sum of:
0.043963756 = product of:
0.08792751 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.7, p.644-668
-
Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007)
0.02
0.021036994 = product of:
0.042073987 = sum of:
0.042073987 = product of:
0.084147975 = sum of:
0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084147975 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, L.: Comparison and evaluation of OPAC end-user interfaces (1994)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.67-98
-
Zumer, M.: Implementation of FRBR : European research initiative (2004)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.02
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.7, S.741-759
-
Svab, K.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of a library catalog for selecting children's picture books (2015)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=2614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.7, S.717-737
-
Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021)
0.02
0.015543535 = product of:
0.03108707 = sum of:
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.1, S.11-27
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.01
0.014875402 = product of:
0.029750803 = sum of:
0.029750803 = product of:
0.059501607 = sum of:
0.059501607 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059501607 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Zumer, M.; O'Neill, E.T.: Modeling aggregates in FRBR (2012)
0.01
0.0133230295 = product of:
0.026646059 = sum of:
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=1913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.456-472
-
Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005)
0.01
0.012271579 = product of:
0.024543159 = sum of:
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.11.2005 18:56:22
-
Dimec, Z.; Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Slovenian cataloguing practice and Functional Requirements for Bibliography Records : a comparative analysis (2004)
0.01
0.011102525 = product of:
0.02220505 = sum of:
0.02220505 = product of:
0.0444101 = sum of:
0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0444101 = score(doc=5857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014)
0.01
0.010518497 = product of:
0.021036994 = sum of:
0.021036994 = product of:
0.042073987 = sum of:
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:12:54
-
Doerr, M.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR entities : identity and identification (2012)
0.01
0.00888202 = product of:
0.01776404 = sum of:
0.01776404 = product of:
0.03552808 = sum of:
0.03552808 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03552808 = score(doc=1917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.17417455 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.517-541
