Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.08
    0.07519582 = product of:
      0.15039164 = sum of:
        0.15039164 = sum of:
          0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07105616 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.07933547 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07933547 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  2. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.06
    0.063577406 = product of:
      0.12715481 = sum of:
        0.12715481 = sum of:
          0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07105616 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
  3. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029750803 = product of:
      0.059501607 = sum of:
        0.059501607 = product of:
          0.119003214 = sum of:
            0.119003214 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.119003214 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  4. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.028049326 = product of:
      0.05609865 = sum of:
        0.05609865 = product of:
          0.1121973 = sum of:
            0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1121973 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  5. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.02
    0.024826001 = product of:
      0.049652003 = sum of:
        0.049652003 = product of:
          0.099304006 = sum of:
            0.099304006 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099304006 = score(doc=677,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.48683268 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024543159 = product of:
      0.049086317 = sum of:
        0.049086317 = product of:
          0.098172635 = sum of:
            0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098172635 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024543159 = product of:
      0.049086317 = sum of:
        0.049086317 = product of:
          0.098172635 = sum of:
            0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098172635 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019833868 = product of:
      0.039667737 = sum of:
        0.039667737 = product of:
          0.07933547 = sum of:
            0.07933547 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07933547 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  9. Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999) 0.02
    0.01776404 = product of:
      0.03552808 = sum of:
        0.03552808 = product of:
          0.07105616 = sum of:
            0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07105616 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.55-68
  10. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  11. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  12. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  13. Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
  14. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  15. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
  16. Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
  17. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  18. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  19. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.008765414 = product of:
      0.017530829 = sum of:
        0.017530829 = product of:
          0.035061657 = sum of:
            0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035061657 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22