Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011) 0.03
    0.026922192 = product of:
      0.053844385 = sum of:
        0.053844385 = product of:
          0.10768877 = sum of:
            0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10768877 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.4, S.277-310
  2. Häusner, E.-M.; Sommerland, Y.: Assessment of metadata quality of the Swedish National Bibliography through mapping user awareness (2018) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.1, S.96-109