Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.13
    0.12853791 = product of:
      0.25707582 = sum of:
        0.25707582 = sum of:
          0.20097718 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20097718 = score(doc=152,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.98528004 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.11
    0.10749253 = product of:
      0.21498506 = sum of:
        0.21498506 = sum of:
          0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1588864 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001) 0.11
    0.10679182 = product of:
      0.21358363 = sum of:
        0.21358363 = sum of:
          0.16449732 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16449732 = score(doc=6084,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The challenge of cataloging Web sites and electronic resources was the most important issue facing the cataloging world in the last year. This article reviews attempts to analyze and revise the cataloging code in view of the new electronic environment. The difficulties of applying traditional library cataloging standards to Web resources has led some to favor metadata as the best means of providing access to these materials. The appropriate education and training for library cataloging personnel remains crucial during this transitional period. Articles on user understanding of Library of Congress subject headings and on cataloging practice are also reviewed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.10
    0.10069061 = product of:
      0.20138122 = sum of:
        0.20138122 = sum of:
          0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1522949 = score(doc=4309,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.09
    0.089585766 = product of:
      0.17917153 = sum of:
        0.17917153 = sum of:
          0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12307288 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.08
    0.080619395 = product of:
      0.16123879 = sum of:
        0.16123879 = sum of:
          0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1191648 = score(doc=2608,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.06
    0.063577406 = product of:
      0.12715481 = sum of:
        0.12715481 = sum of:
          0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07105616 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
  8. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.06
    0.05563023 = product of:
      0.11126046 = sum of:
        0.11126046 = sum of:
          0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06217414 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2004) nos.3/4, S.57-74
  9. Terrill, L.J.: ¬The state of cataloging research : an analysis of peer-reviewed journal literature, 2010-2014 (2016) 0.04
    0.04112433 = product of:
      0.08224866 = sum of:
        0.08224866 = product of:
          0.16449732 = sum of:
            0.16449732 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16449732 = score(doc=5137,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The importance of cataloging research was highlighted by a resolution declaring 2010 as "The Year of Cataloging Research." This study of the peer-reviewed journal literature from 2010 to 2014 examined the state of cataloging literature since this proclamation. The goals were to determine the percentage of cataloging literature that can be classified as research, what research methods were used, and whether the articles contributed to the library assessment conversation. Nearly a quarter of the cataloging literature qualifies as research; however, a majority of researchers fail to make explicit connections between their work and the missions of their libraries.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.8, S.593-611
  10. El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003) 0.04
    0.0397216 = product of:
      0.0794432 = sum of:
        0.0794432 = product of:
          0.1588864 = sum of:
            0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1588864 = score(doc=1997,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 6(2003) no.2, S.35-90
  11. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 1982-2020Salman (2021) 0.04
    0.03768322 = product of:
      0.07536644 = sum of:
        0.07536644 = product of:
          0.15073287 = sum of:
            0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15073287 = score(doc=674,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.73896 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.1, S.53-57
  12. Chan, L.M.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1975 (1976) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Jones, M.H.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1978 (1979) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Rinehart, C.: Subject cataloging in 1982 (1983) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Young, J.B.: Crisis in cataloging revisited : the year's work in subject analysis, 1990 (1991) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 2021 (2022) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=726,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The present bibliography comprises research produced as doctoral dissertations and doctoral theses dealing with library cataloging, classification, and metadata. An attempt has been made to cover all the aspects of these topics so as to match the coverage of this bibliography with the scope of the journal, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.1, p.13-18
  17. Knutson, G.: ¬The year's work in descriptive cataloging, 1992 (1993) 0.03
    0.034756403 = product of:
      0.06951281 = sum of:
        0.06951281 = product of:
          0.13902561 = sum of:
            0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13902561 = score(doc=5192,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The descriptive cataloging literature of 1992 is examined. A number of works deal with the cataloging of special materials. Work in artificial intelligence and expert systems is drawing increased attention, as is the problem of dealing with nonroman scripts in the online environment. Critical analyses of the Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats are also notable. The practicing cataloger is faced with the familiar dilemma of needing to improve cataloging techniques in the here and now, which almost inevitably means incremental change and the desire for a broader vision of the future. The literature shows good efforts in both areas but leaves many fundamental questions unanswered
  18. Carpenter, M.: ¬The narrow, rugged, uninteresting path finally becomes interesting : a review of work in descriptive cataloging in 1991 with trail marks for further research (1992) 0.03
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = product of:
          0.12434828 = sum of:
            0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12434828 = score(doc=5329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 5329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Kirtland, M.; Cochrane, P.A.: Critical views of LCSH - Library of Congress Subject Headings : a bibliographic and bibliometric essay (1981) 0.03
    0.03076822 = product of:
      0.06153644 = sum of:
        0.06153644 = product of:
          0.12307288 = sum of:
            0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12307288 = score(doc=273,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Nachfolger: Shubert, S.B.: Critical views of LCSH - ten years later: a bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.2, S.37-97. Fischer, K.S.: Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001: the third bibliographic essay. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.x-xx.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.71-94
  20. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.03
    0.028049326 = product of:
      0.05609865 = sum of:
        0.05609865 = product of:
          0.1121973 = sum of:
            0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1121973 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26