Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × theme_ss:"Ausbildung"
  1. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.09
    0.09117665 = product of:
      0.1823533 = sum of:
        0.1823533 = sum of:
          0.14729165 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14729165 = score(doc=138,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7220895 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035061657 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.06
    0.063577406 = product of:
      0.12715481 = sum of:
        0.12715481 = sum of:
          0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07105616 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metadata education : asserting a central role in information organization (2002) 0.04
    0.03768322 = product of:
      0.07536644 = sum of:
        0.07536644 = product of:
          0.15073287 = sum of:
            0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15073287 = score(doc=5457,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.73896 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes challenges in organizing digital resources, the role of cataloging in such an effort, forces that threaten the future of cataloging, and responses from the field. It identifies ten issues for consideration when one designs a future cataloging education program. A model program providing four levels of expertise is presented to illustrate that future cataloging education will have a broader scope, incorporating metadata and various aspects of information organization. The program shows that LIS programs can meet different market demands to cover cataloging and metadata topics adequately to help students and ensure the central role of the profession in future information organization.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.203-221
  4. Aulik, J.L.; Burt, H.A.; Gruby, E.; Morgan, A.; O'Halloran, C.: Online mentoring : a student experience at Dominican University (2002) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=5465,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part II
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) no.3, S.289-292
  5. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81