Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.024543159 = product of:
      0.049086317 = sum of:
        0.049086317 = product of:
          0.098172635 = sum of:
            0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098172635 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  2. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.024543159 = product of:
      0.049086317 = sum of:
        0.049086317 = product of:
          0.098172635 = sum of:
            0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098172635 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  3. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.024543159 = product of:
      0.049086317 = sum of:
        0.049086317 = product of:
          0.098172635 = sum of:
            0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098172635 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  4. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998) 0.02
    0.01884161 = product of:
      0.03768322 = sum of:
        0.03768322 = product of:
          0.07536644 = sum of:
            0.07536644 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07536644 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.36948 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
  5. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.017530829 = product of:
      0.035061657 = sum of:
        0.035061657 = product of:
          0.070123315 = sum of:
            0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070123315 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  6. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.017530829 = product of:
      0.035061657 = sum of:
        0.035061657 = product of:
          0.070123315 = sum of:
            0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070123315 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  7. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.017530829 = product of:
      0.035061657 = sum of:
        0.035061657 = product of:
          0.070123315 = sum of:
            0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070123315 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  8. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
  9. Wilkes, A.; Nelson, A.: Subject searching in two online catalogs : authority control vs. non authority control (1995) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.4, S.57-79
  10. Wien, C.: Sample sizes and composition : their effect on recall and precision in IR experiments with OPACs (2000) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.73-86
  11. Schultz Jr., W.N.; Braddy, L.: ¬A librarian-centered study of perceptions of subject terms and controlled vocabulary (2017) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.456-466
  12. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  13. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  15. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  16. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.014024663 = product of:
      0.028049326 = sum of:
        0.028049326 = product of:
          0.05609865 = sum of:
            0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05609865 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  17. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.01
    0.0133230295 = product of:
      0.026646059 = sum of:
        0.026646059 = product of:
          0.053292118 = sum of:
            0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053292118 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.197-211
  18. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  19. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  20. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01
    0.012271579 = product of:
      0.024543159 = sum of:
        0.024543159 = product of:
          0.049086317 = sum of:
            0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049086317 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22