Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.06

0.05563023 = product of:
  0.11126046 = sum of:
    0.11126046 = sum of:
      0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06217414 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049086317 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Cataloging (2009) 0.04

0.043963756 = product of:
  0.08792751 = sum of:
    0.08792751 = product of:
      0.17585503 = sum of:
        0.17585503 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17585503 = score(doc=3758,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.86212003 = fieldWeight in 3758, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: Bibliographic control, the larger field of which cataloging is a part, is discussed in order to provide the context for cataloging. A major product of the process of cataloging, the catalog, is explained in order to underscore why cataloging is needed. The processes for completing original cataloging are delineated, followed by a brief look at cooperative and copy cataloging. Methods for encoding metadata records for online storage and display are outlined. A look at new initiatives and trends for the future of cataloging conclude the discussion.

Taylor, A.G.: On the subject of subjects (1995) 0.03

0.028049326 = product of:
  0.05609865 = sum of:
    0.05609865 = product of:
      0.1121973 = sum of:
        0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1121973 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 11. 1.1997 19:22:24

Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: On teaching subject cataloging (2002) 0.03
```
0.027195519 = product of:
  0.054391038 = sum of:
    0.054391038 = product of:
      0.108782075 = sum of:
        0.108782075 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108782075 = score(doc=5458,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.53329843 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The authors, Professor Arlene G. Taylor and her doctoral student, Daniel N. Joudrey, discuss their approach to teaching subject cataloging in the graduate library and information sciences (LIS) program at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Information Sciences. This essay discusses the authors' thoughts on the importance of subject cataloging in graduate LIS education, the theory versus practice debate, goals, class work, grading, making it concrete to the students, ordering topics in the courses, separating subject analysis from descriptive cataloging, and concerns for the future. In the not too distant past, library schools considered the teaching of Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Subject Headings to be totally adequate preparation for graduates to function subject-wise in their chosen profession. As time has moved on we have gone through periods in which even these were considered unnecessary "because keyword searching is better than subject headings" and "classification is only a location device." The complexities of the current world of subject access (or lack thereof), however, demand that a more complex and thorough approach be taken.

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.223-231

Taylor, A.G.: ¬A quarter century of cataloging education (1996) 0.03

0.026646059 = product of:
  0.053292118 = sum of:
    0.053292118 = product of:
      0.106584236 = sum of:
        0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106584236 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Taylor, A.G.: Where does AACR2 fall short for Internet resources? (1999) 0.03

0.025122147 = product of:
  0.050244294 = sum of:
    0.050244294 = product of:
      0.10048859 = sum of:
        0.10048859 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10048859 = score(doc=6102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: While the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) has served well for all kinds of new information packages as they have been developed since the inception of AACR2 in 1978, the Internet is presenting challenges that are not as readily soluble. Five of the major problems for catalogers are discussed: What is an information package? What is a chief source of information? What is a new edition? Are all Internet resources "published"? Why a "Rule of 3"? Some issues and problems are discussed and some recommendations are made
Source: Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.2, S.43-50

Taylor, A.G.: Enhancing subject access in online systems : the year's work in subject analysis, 1991 (1992) 0.02
```
0.01776404 = product of:
  0.03552808 = sum of:
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07105616 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The research literature published in 1991 in the following categories is examined: users and subject searching, subject access in online catalogs, subject cataloging and indexing, information retrieval, thesaurus and indexing approaches, classification, and specialized subjects and materials. The preponderance of the research dealt with improving subject access in online systems. This seems to have been the result of acceptance by many researchers of a number of previously researched hypotheses that, taken together, indicate that improving online systems holds more promise than trying to perfect the processes of subject analysis

Taylor, A.G.: Research and theoretical considerations in authority control (1989) 0.02

0.01776404 = product of:
  0.03552808 = sum of:
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07105616 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1989) no.3, S.29-56

Taylor, A.G.: Teaching authority control (2004) 0.02

0.015543535 = product of:
  0.03108707 = sum of:
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06217414 = score(doc=5663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx

Taylor, A.G.: Teaching the Dewey Decimal Classification System (2006) 0.02

0.015543535 = product of:
  0.03108707 = sum of:
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06217414 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 42(2006) nos.3/4, S.97-117

Taylor, A.G.: Authority files in online catalogs : an investigation of their value (1984) 0.02

0.015543535 = product of:
  0.03108707 = sum of:
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06217414 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1984) no.3, S.1-17

Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.02

0.015543535 = product of:
  0.03108707 = sum of:
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06217414 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.1-39

Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes