-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.11
0.10749253 = product of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.11
0.10749253 = product of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005)
0.10
0.10069061 = product of:
0.20138122 = sum of:
0.20138122 = sum of:
0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1522949 = score(doc=128,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.10
0.10069061 = product of:
0.20138122 = sum of:
0.20138122 = sum of:
0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1522949 = score(doc=4309,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.09
0.094055966 = product of:
0.18811193 = sum of:
0.18811193 = sum of:
0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13902561 = score(doc=114,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013)
0.09
0.09153584 = product of:
0.18307167 = sum of:
0.18307167 = sum of:
0.1409977 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1409977 = score(doc=2603,freq=14.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6912338 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.09
0.089585766 = product of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12307288 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.08
0.080619395 = product of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1191648 = score(doc=121,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.08
0.080619395 = product of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.16123879 = sum of:
0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1191648 = score(doc=2608,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006)
0.07
0.07432911 = product of:
0.14865822 = sum of:
0.14865822 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=1087,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.07
0.06850691 = product of:
0.13701382 = sum of:
0.13701382 = sum of:
0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792751 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006)
0.06
0.05563023 = product of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.05
0.048933513 = product of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.06280537 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06280537 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3079 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003)
0.04
0.0397216 = product of:
0.0794432 = sum of:
0.0794432 = product of:
0.1588864 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=1997,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 6(2003) no.2, S.35-90
-
Chan, L.M.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1975 (1976)
0.04
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = product of:
0.14211231 = sum of:
0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14211231 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Conway, M. O'Hara: Research in cataloging and classification : methods and issues - a selective, annotated bibliography (1994)
0.04
0.03552808 = product of:
0.07105616 = sum of:
0.07105616 = product of:
0.14211231 = sum of:
0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14211231 = score(doc=1021,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This selective bibliography, prepared for the Jun 1993 ALCTS CCS preconference on research in cataloging and classification, is intended for the librarian with little or no experience conducting research. Its aim is to acquaint the librarian with 'a few good books' (and one article) on research methods and statistics; to offer selections 'from the literature' that suggest potentially fruitful areas for research in cataloging and classification; and to assist the librarian in successfully communicating his or her findings to the library community
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.119-129
