-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.11
0.10749253 = product of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.21498506 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.09
0.089585766 = product of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.17917153 = sum of:
0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12307288 = score(doc=132,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004)
0.08
0.07838754 = product of:
0.15677509 = sum of:
0.15677509 = sum of:
0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10768877 = score(doc=2844,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper will describe the way in which the USMARC cataloging schema is used at the Eisenhower National Clearing-house (ENC). Discussion will include how ENC MARC extensions were developed for cataloging mathematics and science curriculum resources, and how the ENC workflow is integrated into the cataloging interface. The discussion will conclude with a historical look at the in-house data transfer from ENC MARC to the current production of IEEE LOM XML encoding for record sharing and OAI compliance, required under the NSDL project guidelines.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
-
Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.06
0.063577406 = product of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.12715481 = sum of:
0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07105616 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05609865 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.06
0.05563023 = product of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.11126046 = sum of:
0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217414 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049086317 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000)
0.05
0.048933513 = product of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.09786703 = sum of:
0.06280537 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06280537 = score(doc=185,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.3079 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035061657 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009)
0.05
0.047683053 = product of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.095366105 = sum of:
0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053292118 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042073987 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:38
-
Sandberg-Fox, A.M.: ¬The microcomputer revolution (2001)
0.04
0.038073726 = product of:
0.07614745 = sum of:
0.07614745 = product of:
0.1522949 = sum of:
0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1522949 = score(doc=5409,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The audiovisual cataloging current; Part I"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 31(2001) no.2, S.85-100
-
Condron, L.; Tittemore, C.P.: ¬... Or perhaps MARC can be reborn (2003)
0.03
0.03108707 = product of:
0.06217414 = sum of:
0.06217414 = product of:
0.12434828 = sum of:
0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12434828 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.2, S.17-20
-
Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009)
0.03
0.0297912 = product of:
0.0595824 = sum of:
0.0595824 = product of:
0.1191648 = sum of:
0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1191648 = score(doc=3750,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.028049326 = product of:
0.05609865 = sum of:
0.05609865 = product of:
0.1121973 = sum of:
0.1121973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1121973 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for access : a cataloging guide (2000)
0.03
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = product of:
0.106584236 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005)
0.03
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = product of:
0.106584236 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001)
0.03
0.026646059 = product of:
0.053292118 = sum of:
0.053292118 = product of:
0.106584236 = sum of:
0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106584236 = score(doc=5441,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.2, S.17-28
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.024543159 = product of:
0.049086317 = sum of:
0.049086317 = product of:
0.098172635 = sum of:
0.098172635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098172635 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
