Search (381 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.13
    0.12853791 = product of:
      0.25707582 = sum of:
        0.25707582 = sum of:
          0.20097718 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20097718 = score(doc=152,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.98528004 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.12
    0.123881854 = product of:
      0.24776371 = sum of:
        0.24776371 = sum of:
          0.1776404 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1776404 = score(doc=4056,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.87087274 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070123315 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim
  3. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.11
    0.10749253 = product of:
      0.21498506 = sum of:
        0.21498506 = sum of:
          0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1588864 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001) 0.10
    0.10069061 = product of:
      0.20138122 = sum of:
        0.20138122 = sum of:
          0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1522949 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
    Date
    28. 7.2006 20:09:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.1, S.21-31
  5. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.10
    0.10069061 = product of:
      0.20138122 = sum of:
        0.20138122 = sum of:
          0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1522949 = score(doc=128,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.10
    0.096403435 = product of:
      0.19280687 = sum of:
        0.19280687 = sum of:
          0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15073287 = score(doc=5386,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.73896 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 30(2000) nos.2/3, S.315-329
  7. Weiss, A.K.: Proliferating guidelines : a history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources (2003) 0.10
    0.096403435 = product of:
      0.19280687 = sum of:
        0.19280687 = sum of:
          0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15073287 = score(doc=71,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.73896 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.10
    0.095366105 = product of:
      0.19073221 = sum of:
        0.19073221 = sum of:
          0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106584236 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.084147975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084147975 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  9. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=5479,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the development of descriptive cataloging from 1830 to 1908 and focuses on the careers of Antonio Panizzi, Charles Coffin Jewett, and Charles Ammi Cutter and the development of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Library Association of the United Kingdom (LAUK). It analyzes the various rules and codes put forth by both Americans and British librarians and the eventual cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Historical aspects of cataloging and classification; Part I
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  10. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=114,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=129,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.09
    0.094055966 = product of:
      0.18811193 = sum of:
        0.18811193 = sum of:
          0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13902561 = score(doc=158,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049086317 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.09
    0.09117665 = product of:
      0.1823533 = sum of:
        0.1823533 = sum of:
          0.14729165 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14729165 = score(doc=138,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.7220895 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.035061657 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035061657 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.09
    0.089585766 = product of:
      0.17917153 = sum of:
        0.17917153 = sum of:
          0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12307288 = score(doc=132,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000) 0.09
    0.089585766 = product of:
      0.17917153 = sum of:
        0.17917153 = sum of:
          0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12307288 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Kellsey, C.: Cooperative cataloging, vendor records, and European language monographs (2002) 0.09
    0.086306244 = product of:
      0.17261249 = sum of:
        0.17261249 = sum of:
          0.1305385 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1305385 = score(doc=160,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.63995814 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The appearance in OCLC and RLIN of minimal level catalog records from European book vendors for European language monographs and their effect on cataloging department workflows and cooperative cataloging efforts have been matters of concern expressed recently at ALA meetings and in the library literature. A study of 8,778 catalog records was undertaken to discover how many current European language monographs were being cataloged by the Library of Congress, by member libraries, and by vendors. It was found that vendor records accounted for 16. 7% of Spanish books, 18% of French books, 33.6% of German books, and 52.5% of those in Italian. The number of libraries enhancing vendor records in OCLC was found to be only approximately one-third the number of libraries contributing original records for European language books. Ongoing increases in European book publishing and the increasing globalization of cataloging databases mean that the results of this study have implications not only for local cataloging practice but for cooperative cataloging as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.09
    0.086306244 = product of:
      0.17261249 = sum of:
        0.17261249 = sum of:
          0.1305385 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1305385 = score(doc=2766,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.63995814 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  18. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.08
    0.080619395 = product of:
      0.16123879 = sum of:
        0.16123879 = sum of:
          0.1191648 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1191648 = score(doc=121,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Boeuf, P. le: ¬The Impact of the FRBR model an the future revisions of the ISBDs : a challenge for the IFLA Section an Cataloging (2002) 0.08
    0.07947175 = product of:
      0.1589435 = sum of:
        0.1589435 = sum of:
          0.0888202 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0888202 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
          0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070123315 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 8.2005 9:12:22
  20. Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003) 0.08
    0.07947175 = product of:
      0.1589435 = sum of:
        0.1589435 = sum of:
          0.0888202 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0888202 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
          0.070123315 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070123315 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:22:29

Languages

  • e 351
  • d 27
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 344
  • m 25
  • b 13
  • s 13
  • el 10
  • p 3
  • r 3
  • More… Less…