Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.05
    0.047683053 = product of:
      0.095366105 = sum of:
        0.095366105 = sum of:
          0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053292118 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Naun, C.C.: Next generation OPACs : a cataloging viewpoint (2010) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=2987,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since around 2005 several striking attempts have been made to rethink the design of library catalogs in production systems; the North Carolina State University's (NCSU) Endeca catalog being a notable example. These developments are taking place just as the continued relevance of traditional cataloging is being questioned. This article examines the relationship of these new designs to evolving cataloging practice and the changing discovery environment.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.4, S.330-342
  3. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Zusatzinformationen im interaktiven Katalog : LibraryThing - Social Cataloging-Plattform und Kataloganreicherung für Bibliotheken (2012) 0.03
    0.025122147 = product of:
      0.050244294 = sum of:
        0.050244294 = product of:
          0.10048859 = sum of:
            0.10048859 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10048859 = score(doc=574,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 574, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In zahlreichen Social Cataloging-Plattformen haben Nutzer die Möglichkeit, ihre Buchsammlung zu präsentieren und sich über diese auszutauschen. Bekannte Beispiele sind Lovelybooks, Goodreads oder Shelfari. Die weltweit größte Community trifft sich auf LibraryThing. Neben der öffentlichen Plattform bietet LibraryThing auch entgeltpflichtige Kataloganreicherungen für Bibliotheken - LibraryThing for Libraries. Dirk Ehlen und Simon Brenner berichten im Folgenden über das Produkt.
  4. Petrucciani, A.: Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs (2015) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=1878,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of large catalogs is uneven and often low, but this issue is underrated and understudied. Library catalogs often fail to communicate correct and clear information to users and their low quality is not simply due to faults, duplications, and so on but also to unwise cataloging standards and policies. While there is plenty of uncontrolled information about books and other publications, the need for good-quality bibliographic information is apparent and library catalogs may provide a trustworthy map of the publishing output, with full control of editions, works, authors, and so on and effective navigation functions, which are lacking in today's information-rich environment.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.303-313
  5. Welsh, A.: ¬The rare books catalog and the scholarly database (2016) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenherft: 'The present and future state of rare materials cataloging: an international perspective'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.5/6, S.317-337
  6. Polidoro, P.: Using qualitative methods to analyze online catalog interfaces (2015) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.314-330
  7. Wilson, V.: Catalog users "in the wild" : the potential of an ethnographic approach to studies of library catalogs and their users (2015) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=2016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2016)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.2, S.190-213
  8. Schultz Jr., W.N.; Braddy, L.: ¬A librarian-centered study of perceptions of subject terms and controlled vocabulary (2017) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.456-466
  9. Subject access : preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future" (2011) 0.01
    0.0125610735 = product of:
      0.025122147 = sum of:
        0.025122147 = product of:
          0.050244294 = sum of:
            0.050244294 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050244294 = score(doc=1799,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.24632001 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Subject cataloging / Congresses
    Subject
    Subject cataloging / Congresses
  10. Willson, R.; Given, L.M.: ¬The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs : a mixed methods study (2010) 0.01
    0.011102525 = product of:
      0.02220505 = sum of:
        0.02220505 = product of:
          0.0444101 = sum of:
            0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0444101 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although technology can often correct spelling errors, the complex tasks of information searching and retrieval in an online public access catalog (OPAC) are made more difficult by these errors in users' input and bibliographic records. This study examines the search behaviors of 38 university students, divided into groups with either easy-to-spell or difficult-to-spell search terms, who were asked to find items in the OPAC with these search terms. Search behaviors and strategy use in the OPAC and on the World Wide Web (WWW) were examined. In general, students used familiar Web resources to check their spelling or discover more about the assigned topic. Students with difficult-to-spell search terms checked spelling more often, changed search strategies to look for the general topic and had fewer successful searches. Students unable to find the correct spelling of a search term were unable to complete their search. Students tended to search the OPAC as they would search a search engine, with few search terms or complex search strategies. The results of this study have implications for spell checking, user-focused OPAC design, and cataloging. Students' search behaviors are discussed by expanding Thatcher's (2006) Information-Seeking Process and Tactics for the WWW model to include OPACs.
  11. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.01
    0.011102525 = product of:
      0.02220505 = sum of:
        0.02220505 = product of:
          0.0444101 = sum of:
            0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0444101 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.4, S.229-246
  12. Rodríguez Bravo, B.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.; Simões, M.G. de M.; Freitas, M.C.V. de: Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries (2014) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  14. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.01
    0.0052592484 = product of:
      0.010518497 = sum of:
        0.010518497 = product of:
          0.021036994 = sum of:
            0.021036994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021036994 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22