Search (209 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.06 
    0.063577406 = product of:
  0.12715481 = sum of:
    0.12715481 = sum of:
      0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07105616 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05609865 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.1-27
  2. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.05 
    0.047683053 = product of:
  0.095366105 = sum of:
    0.095366105 = sum of:
      0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053292118 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042073987 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.708-733
  3. Hoffman, G.L.; Snow, K.: Cataloging and classification : back to basics: introduction (2021) 0.05 
    0.04615233 = product of:
  0.09230466 = sum of:
    0.09230466 = product of:
      0.18460932 = sum of:
        0.18460932 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18460932 = score(doc=695,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.9050375 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1883174. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.73-76
  4. Dobreski, B.: Descriptive cataloging : the history and practice of describing library resources (2021) 0.04 
    0.044187494 = product of:
  0.08837499 = sum of:
    0.08837499 = product of:
      0.17674997 = sum of:
        0.17674997 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17674997 = score(doc=706,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.8665075 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Descriptive cataloging is the process of representing resources by recording their identifying traits and selecting specific names and titles to serve as access points. It is a key component of the larger cataloging process alongside subject cataloging, authority work, and encoding. Descriptive cataloging practices have existed for centuries and, over time, have become standardized through the use of cataloging codes. These documents guide this process by prescribing a consistent set of elements, providing directions on how to record these elements, and offering instructions on how to select and format access points. The goal of descriptive cataloging is not to create perfect representations but to provide data to serve users. The international cataloging standard Resource Description and Access (RDA) is now bringing more institutions under the same set of descriptive practices than ever before. This, along with recent technological developments, promises increased sharing and reuse of descriptive cataloging data.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1864693. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.225-241
  5. Martin, J.M.: Records, responsibility, and power : an overview of cataloging ethics (2021) 0.04 
    0.044187494 = product of:
  0.08837499 = sum of:
    0.08837499 = product of:
      0.17674997 = sum of:
        0.17674997 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17674997 = score(doc=708,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.8665075 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ethics are principles which provide a framework for making decisions that best reflect a set of values. Cataloging carries power, so ethical decision-making is crucial. Because cataloging requires decision-making in areas that differ from other library work, cataloging ethics are a distinct subset of library ethics. Cataloging ethics draw on the primary values of serving the needs of users and providing access to materials. Cataloging ethics are not new, but they have received increased attention since the 1970s. Major current issues in cataloging ethics include the creation of a code of ethics; ongoing debate on the appropriate role of neutrality in cataloging misleading materials and in subject heading lists and classification schemes; how and to what degree considerations of privacy and self-determination should shape authority work; and whether or not our current cataloging codes are sufficiently user-focused.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458 Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.281-304
  6. Thomas, S.E.: ¬The Program for Cooperative Cataloging : backstory and future potential (2020) 0.04 
    0.04112433 = product of:
  0.08224866 = sum of:
    0.08224866 = product of:
      0.16449732 = sum of:
        0.16449732 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16449732 = score(doc=124,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 1988 the Library of Congress and eight library participants undertook a two-year pilot known as the National Coordinated Cataloging Program (NCCP) to increase the number of quality bibliographic records. Subsequently the Bibliographic Services Study Committee reviewed the pilot. Discussions held at the Library of Congress (LC) and in other fora resulted in the creation of the Cooperative Cataloging Council, and, ultimately, the establishment of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) in 1994. The conditions that contributed to a successful approach to shared cataloging are described. The article concludes with considerations for expanding the future effectiveness of the PCC.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.190-203
  7. Diken, T.: Cataloging psychological tests in an academic library (2021) 0.04 
    0.04112433 = product of:
  0.08224866 = sum of:
    0.08224866 = product of:
      0.16449732 = sum of:
        0.16449732 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16449732 = score(doc=715,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 715, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Often relegated to a side note in conversations about curriculum materials collections, psychological tests deserve their own consideration in library cataloging. Libraries that are dedicated to psychology (or psychology and a related field, such as education) lend psychological tests either for reference or for usage in clinical training programs. These libraries, largely academic, have a need for guidelines regarding the cataloging of psychological tests, as those developed under the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition (AACR2) are no longer satisfactory for Resource Description and Access (RDA) cataloging. This paper provides an overview of AACR2 cataloging guidelines and proposes new RDA best practices when cataloging psychological assessments, including kits.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.7, p.669-680
  8. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04 
    0.041101757 = product of:
  0.082203515 = sum of:
    0.082203515 = product of:
      0.24661054 = sum of:
        0.24661054 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24661054 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4387947 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  9. Miksa, S.D.: Cataloging principles and objectives : history and development (2021) 0.04 
    0.03996909 = product of:
  0.07993818 = sum of:
    0.07993818 = product of:
      0.15987636 = sum of:
        0.15987636 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15987636 = score(doc=702,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.78378546 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1883173. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.97-128
  10. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021) 0.04 
    0.038073726 = product of:
  0.07614745 = sum of:
    0.07614745 = product of:
      0.1522949 = sum of:
        0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1522949 = score(doc=700,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to present a prototype cataloging interface, which provides easier data entry, follows the cataloger's thought process and is based on the advantages of the IFLA LRM model. The paper summarizes all stages of the conceptual design and shows how the LRM was implemented. The main purpose of the cataloging interface design is to show how a LRM-based cataloging module might look like and how it could improve the existing cataloging process.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.7, p.619-643
  11. Snow, K.; Dunbar, A.W.: Advancing the relationship between critical cataloging and critical race theory (2022) 0.04 
    0.038073726 = product of:
  0.07614745 = sum of:
    0.07614745 = product of:
      0.1522949 = sum of:
        0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1522949 = score(doc=1145,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Critical race theory (CRT) is a framework that evolved from critical legal studies of the 1970s but has only recently been the target of intense scrutiny in education and politics. This article aims to describe CRT and how it can frame issues within cataloging and classification standards and practice. CRT tenets permanence of racism, whiteness as property, the critique of liberalism, intersectionality, counter-storytelling, and interest convergence are explored in the context of cataloging and classification work. Concepts of "authority" and "justice" are also examined. CRT can provide valuable evidence for critical cataloging efforts to make cataloging more diverse, equitable, and inclusive.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.6-7, p.646-674
  12. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations (2020) 0.04 
    0.03768322 = product of:
  0.07536644 = sum of:
    0.07536644 = product of:
      0.15073287 = sum of:
        0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15073287 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.73896 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.28-43
  13. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 1982-2020Salman (2021) 0.04 
    0.03768322 = product of:
  0.07536644 = sum of:
    0.07536644 = product of:
      0.15073287 = sum of:
        0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15073287 = score(doc=674,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.73896 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.1, S.53-57
  14. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 2021 (2022) 0.04 
    0.03552808 = product of:
  0.07105616 = sum of:
    0.07105616 = product of:
      0.14211231 = sum of:
        0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14211231 = score(doc=726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The present bibliography comprises research produced as doctoral dissertations and doctoral theses dealing with library cataloging, classification, and metadata. An attempt has been made to cover all the aspects of these topics so as to match the coverage of this bibliography with the scope of the journal, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.1, p.13-18
  15. Marques Redigolo, F.; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Guidelines for subject analysis in subject cataloging (2022) 0.04 
    0.035249423 = product of:
  0.07049885 = sum of:
    0.07049885 = product of:
      0.1409977 = sum of:
        0.1409977 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1409977 = score(doc=736,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6912338 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The representation of information in subject cataloging as a result of subject analysis will depend on the cataloger's prior knowledge, influenced by subjectivity. The subject analysis in cataloging is a central theme of this investigation with the aim to elaborate guidelines for subject analysis in cataloging. For this purpose, how books are cataloged in university libraries has been verified. The Individual Verbal Protocol was applied with catalogers from Brazilian and Spanish University Libraries. Directions for the elements and variables of the subject analysis and procedures for good development were obtained to constitute the Guidelines of Subject Analysis in Cataloging. It is concluded that the guidelines formed by four sections are indicated for incorporation in subject cataloging procedure manuals for the purpose of improving the levels of representation and information retrieval results.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.5, p.424-443
  16. Kyprianos, K.; Lolou, E.; Efthymiou, F.: Cataloging quality and the views of catalogers in Hellenic academic libraries (2022) 0.04 
    0.035249423 = product of:
  0.07049885 = sum of:
    0.07049885 = product of:
      0.1409977 = sum of:
        0.1409977 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1409977 = score(doc=1146,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6912338 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study focuses on cataloging quality and how it is defined by information professionals, specifically university library catalogers. Although there is no single and objective definition of 'cataloging quality,' research aims to specify its core characteristics. The goal is to define the modern cataloging environment, as well as the tools and opportunities it provides, and to improve the success of academic library services for both professional catalogers and users, who are the final consumers of the information. Regarding methodology, a sample survey was chosen. The survey results revealed that the quality of cataloging is determined by several factors, including technical features of the data, adherence to standards, the cataloging process, user satisfaction, and the development of a general quality culture.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.8, p.683-707
  17. Chan, M.; Daniels, J.; Furger, S.; Rasmussen, D.; Shoemaker, E.; Snow, K.: ¬The development and future of the cataloguing code of ethics (2022) 0.03 
    0.034756403 = product of:
  0.06951281 = sum of:
    0.06951281 = product of:
      0.13902561 = sum of:
        0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13902561 = score(doc=1149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Cataloguing Code of Ethics, released in January 2021, was the product of a multi-national, multi-year endeavor by the Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee to create a useful framework for the discussion of cataloging ethics. The six Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee members, based in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, recount the efforts of the group and the cataloging community leading up to the release of the Code, as well as provide their thoughts on the challenges of creating the document, lessons learned, and the future of the Code.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.8, p.786-806
  18. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.03 
    0.034756403 = product of:
  0.06951281 = sum of:
    0.06951281 = product of:
      0.13902561 = sum of:
        0.13902561 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13902561 = score(doc=1156,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social cataloging websites, such as Goodreads, LibraryThing, and StoryGraph are widely popular with individuals who want to track their reading and read reviews. Goodreads is one of the most popular sites with 90 million registered users as of 2019. This paper studies a Goodreads cataloging rule, NOT A BOOK (NAB), through which users designate items as invalid to the site's scope while preserving some of their metadata. By reviewing NAB, we identify thirteen types of invalid items. We go on to discuss how these item types unevenly reflect the rule itself and the emergence of a "non-book" sense through social cataloging.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.2, p.203-227
  19. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.034251466 = product of:
  0.06850293 = sum of:
    0.06850293 = product of:
      0.20550878 = sum of:
        0.20550878 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20550878 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4387947 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  20. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03 
    0.034251466 = product of:
  0.06850293 = sum of:
    0.06850293 = product of:
      0.20550878 = sum of:
        0.20550878 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20550878 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4387947 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

Authors

Languages

  • e 180
  • d 29

Types

  • a 200
  • el 24
  • m 5
  • p 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications