Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006) 0.01

0.0092959395 = product of:
  0.055775635 = sum of:
    0.055775635 = product of:
      0.11155127 = sum of:
        0.11155127 = weight(_text_:essays in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11155127 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.49409455 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source: Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad

Beghtol, C.: Nancy J. Williamson and the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) (2010) 0.01

0.0070753614 = product of:
  0.042452168 = sum of:
    0.042452168 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042452168 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.26-35

Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.01
```
0.006399976 = product of:
  0.038399857 = sum of:
    0.038399857 = product of:
      0.07679971 = sum of:
        0.07679971 = weight(_text_:addresses in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679971 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.37955892 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery : relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications (2003) 0.01
```
0.0053333133 = product of:
  0.03199988 = sum of:
    0.03199988 = product of:
      0.06399976 = sum of:
        0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06399976 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Classification is a transdisciplinary activity that occurs during all human pursuits. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. In information retrieval, the primary purpose of classification is to find knowledge that already exists, but one of the purposes of classification in other fields is to discover new knowledge. In this paper, classifications for information retrieval are called "professional" classifications because they are devised by people who have a professional interest in classification, and classifications for knowledge discovery are called "naive" classifications because they are devised by people who have no particular interest in studying classification as an end in itself. This paper compares the overall purposes and methods of these two kinds of classifications and provides a general model of the relationships between the two kinds of classificatory activity in the context of information studies. This model addresses issues of the influence of scholarly activity and communication an the creation and revision of classifications for the purposes of information retrieval and for the purposes of knowledge discovery. Further comparisons elucidate the relationships between the universality of classificatory methods and the specific purposes served by naive and professional classification systems.

Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00

0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date: 5. 8.2006 13:22:08

Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00

0.0019949926 = product of:
  0.011969955 = sum of:
    0.011969955 = product of:
      0.02393991 = sum of:
        0.02393991 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02393991 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Pages: S.19-22

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Themes