Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997) 0.01
    0.012254885 = product of:
      0.07352931 = sum of:
        0.07352931 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07352931 = score(doc=507,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
  2. Briel, G. von: Erfahrungen mit der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in der Kantonsbibliothek Thurgau in Frauenfeld/Schweiz (2008) 0.01
    0.010623931 = product of:
      0.063743584 = sum of:
        0.063743584 = product of:
          0.12748717 = sum of:
            0.12748717 = weight(_text_:essays in 2147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12748717 = score(doc=2147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.5646795 = fieldWeight in 2147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  3. Steele, T.D.; Foote, J.B.: Reclassification in academic research libraries : is it still relevant in an e-book world? (2011) 0.01
    0.010006072 = product of:
      0.06003643 = sum of:
        0.06003643 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06003643 = score(doc=4167,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines whether academic libraries are still reclassifying materials, how they are doing so, and if the acquisition of electronic materials has an impact on reclassification efforts. An online survey was sent to the heads of cataloging units at libraries belonging to the Association of Research Libraries to answer these questions. Almost one-third of libraries are currently involved in reclassification projects. Most respondents reported they do not believe that purchasing e-books has affected their decisions about reclassification. The article also examines the faceted search capability of next-generation catalogs and their possible impact on patrons' use of classification.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.1, S.14-32
  4. Lindpointner, R.: ¬Die Entscheidung für die DDC als Aufstellungssystematik an der Oberösterreichischen Landesbibliothek in Linz (2008) 0.01
    0.007967949 = product of:
      0.04780769 = sum of:
        0.04780769 = product of:
          0.09561538 = sum of:
            0.09561538 = weight(_text_:essays in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09561538 = score(doc=2184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.42350963 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  5. Sapiie, J.: Reader-interest classification : the user-friendly schemes (1995) 0.01
    0.0070753614 = product of:
      0.042452168 = sum of:
        0.042452168 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042452168 = score(doc=5548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5548)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
  6. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.0070753614 = product of:
      0.042452168 = sum of:
        0.042452168 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042452168 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1984) no.2, S.45-50
  7. Donovan, J.M.: Patron expectations about collocation : measuring the difference between the psychologically real and the really real (1991) 0.01
    0.0070753614 = product of:
      0.042452168 = sum of:
        0.042452168 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042452168 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.23-43
  8. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014) 0.01
    0.0070753614 = product of:
      0.042452168 = sum of:
        0.042452168 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042452168 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.2, S.137-155
  9. Blinten, B.: Perspektiven der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation als Aufstellungssystematik in deutschsprachigen Bibliotheken (2008) 0.01
    0.006639957 = product of:
      0.03983974 = sum of:
        0.03983974 = product of:
          0.07967948 = sum of:
            0.07967948 = weight(_text_:essays in 2155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07967948 = score(doc=2155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.3529247 = fieldWeight in 2155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  10. Zhao, L.: Save space for "newcomers" : analyzing problems in book number assignment under the LCC system (2004) 0.01
    0.006064595 = product of:
      0.03638757 = sum of:
        0.03638757 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03638757 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) no.1, S.105-119
  11. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.01
    0.006064595 = product of:
      0.03638757 = sum of:
        0.03638757 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03638757 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1984) no.2, S.1-11
  12. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.01
    0.006064595 = product of:
      0.03638757 = sum of:
        0.03638757 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03638757 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
  13. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.00
    0.003191988 = product of:
      0.019151928 = sum of:
        0.019151928 = product of:
          0.038303856 = sum of:
            0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038303856 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  14. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.00
    0.003191988 = product of:
      0.019151928 = sum of:
        0.019151928 = product of:
          0.038303856 = sum of:
            0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038303856 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  15. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.00
    0.003191988 = product of:
      0.019151928 = sum of:
        0.019151928 = product of:
          0.038303856 = sum of:
            0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038303856 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  16. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.00
    0.0027929894 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = product of:
          0.03351587 = sum of:
            0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03351587 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  17. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.00
    0.0027929894 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = product of:
          0.03351587 = sum of:
            0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03351587 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  18. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.00
    0.0027929894 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = product of:
          0.03351587 = sum of:
            0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03351587 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  19. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.00
    0.0027929894 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = product of:
          0.03351587 = sum of:
            0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03351587 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  20. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.00
    0.0023939908 = product of:
      0.0143639445 = sum of:
        0.0143639445 = product of:
          0.028727889 = sum of:
            0.028727889 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028727889 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03533926 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22