-
Lam, V.-T.: Error rates in monograph copy cataloging bibliographic records before and after outsourcing at the University of Saskatchewan Library (2007)
0.05
0.05359237 = product of:
0.1607771 = sum of:
0.09703352 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09703352 = score(doc=254,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
0.063743584 = product of:
0.12748717 = sum of:
0.12748717 = weight(_text_:essays in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12748717 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.5646795 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This comparative study was conducted to compare error rates encountered in monograph copy cataloging bibliographic records before and after a cataloging outsourcing program was implemented at the University of Saskatchewan Library. The findings of the study were twofold: (1) The error rates were low and acceptable; (2) There was no significant difference between error rates before and after outsourcing.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.213-220
-
Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003)
0.05
0.052126016 = product of:
0.15637805 = sum of:
0.13722612 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13722612 = score(doc=152,freq=16.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.98528004 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.019151928 = product of:
0.038303856 = sum of:
0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038303856 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Steinhagen, E.N.; Hanson, M.E.; Moynahan, S.A.: Quo vadis, cataloging? (2007)
0.05
0.050233856 = product of:
0.15070157 = sum of:
0.09492593 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09492593 = score(doc=262,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.055775635 = product of:
0.11155127 = sum of:
0.11155127 = weight(_text_:essays in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11155127 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.49409455 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Under the leadership of Ruth Carter's generation, cooperative, shared cataloging grew and flourished among academic and research libraries. The authors provide an overview of trends and challenges from a golden age of expanding budgets and international cooperation during the 1970's and 1980's and later responses to the economic retrenchment and demographic changes of the 1990's and early 2000's. Responses to current challenges, including the impact of outsourced cataloging, increasing complexity of cataloging rules, and emerging technological options, are discussed.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.271-280
-
Li, Y.: Consistency versus inconsistency : issues in Chinese cataloging in OCLC (2004)
0.05
0.049595322 = product of:
0.14878596 = sum of:
0.10398614 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398614 = score(doc=5657,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 5657, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5657)
0.04479983 = product of:
0.08959966 = sum of:
0.08959966 = weight(_text_:addresses in 5657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08959966 = score(doc=5657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.44281873 = fieldWeight in 5657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article addresses some unresolved cataloging issue related to pinyin Romanization, vernacular application, field coding, and other aspects of Chinese cataloging in OCLC. These issues lead to inconsistencies in the way Chinese materials are cataloged, though cataloging standards and Romanization rules are made and the processes of the projects like Pinyin Conversion, Manual Review, and Pinyin Clean-Up have been completed. In this article, eight of the most commonly encountered issues and inconsistent practices in Chinese cataloging are discussed. Examples from Chinese records created with OCLC CJK software in WorldCat are used to demonstrate the problems they raise. With the discussion it is hoped that these inconsistent practices can be recognized and avoided in the future.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) no.2, S.17-xx
-
Crowe, M.J.: Cataloguing Icelandic materials (1993)
0.05
0.04941111 = product of:
0.14823332 = sum of:
0.09703352 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09703352 = score(doc=565,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.051199805 = product of:
0.10239961 = sum of:
0.10239961 = weight(_text_:addresses in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10239961 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.50607854 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses issues in descriptive cataloging, subject analysis, and classification of Icelandic materials. It includes an extensive discussion of Icelandic personal names, particularly their formulation and its implications for establishing entries according to AACRZ. Subsequent sections of the paper deal with uniform titles in Old Norse, subject headings, and classification with descrip: tions of current practice and with reflections on needed enhance-, ments. It concludes with a consideration of the availability and usefulness of various cataloging aids and includes a bibliography of helpful reference sources.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Languages of the World: Cataloging Issues and Problems
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.1/2, S. 29-46
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.05
0.048410606 = product of:
0.14523181 = sum of:
0.121291906 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121291906 = score(doc=4056,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.87087274 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.02393991 = product of:
0.04787982 = sum of:
0.04787982 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04787982 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
- Pages
- S.3-22
- Source
- Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim
-
Kaplan, A.G.; Riedling, A.M.: Catalog it! : a guide to cataloging school library materials (2015)
0.05
0.04711031 = product of:
0.14133093 = sum of:
0.10933104 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10933104 = score(doc=2379,freq=26.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.78499407 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.03199988 = product of:
0.06399976 = sum of:
0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06399976 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This invaluable cataloging resource gives pre-service and practicing school library media specialists the tools they need to be intelligent consumers of commercial cataloging and competent organizers of new materials in their collections. The second edition contains expanded information on Library of Congress Subject Headings and electronic cataloging and cataloging systems, as well as Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC). Whether you're a practicing cataloger looking for a short text to update you on the application of RDA to cataloging records or a school librarian who needs a quick resource to answer cataloging questions, this guide is for you. - Thoroughly updates a best-selling, essential guide to cataloging - Addresses the new standards specifically as they apply to school libraries - Helps school librarians understand and implement the new cataloging standards in their collections - Distills the latest information and presents it in a format that is clear and accessible - Fills the need for up-to-the-minute cataloging guidance for the busy librarian who wants information in a hurry
- LCSH
- Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Subject
- Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.04
0.04314385 = product of:
0.12943155 = sum of:
0.1150676 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1150676 = score(doc=103,freq=20.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.8261824 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.0143639445 = product of:
0.028727889 = sum of:
0.028727889 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028727889 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miller, R.R.: Principia bibliographica? : balancing principles, practice, and pragmatics in a changing digital environment (2007)
0.04
0.04310165 = product of:
0.12930495 = sum of:
0.07352931 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352931 = score(doc=259,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
0.055775635 = product of:
0.11155127 = sum of:
0.11155127 = weight(_text_:essays in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11155127 = score(doc=259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.49409455 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article explores the emphasis on control in cataloging versus the chaos found on the Web. It delves into adversarial relationships between catalogers and technologists. It seeks commonalities and suggests that new alternatives addressing both perspectives might offer superior and more satisfying results. A series of examples juxtapose current practices, enrichment possibilities, and flaws in current digital solutions to suggest potential opportunities where catalogers might excel. Speculation on ways to promote cataloging principles and values via more direct participation in the unruly digital environment hints at a more promising future for our profession.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.281-305
-
Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007)
0.04
0.04310165 = product of:
0.12930495 = sum of:
0.07352931 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352931 = score(doc=267,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.055775635 = product of:
0.11155127 = sum of:
0.11155127 = weight(_text_:essays in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11155127 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22576907 = queryWeight, product of:
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.49409455 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.3886194 = idf(docFreq=201, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is compared to descriptive bibliography, to enumerative bibliography and abstracting and indexing services, as well as to metadata created by Web search engines or nonprofessionals at sites such as Amazon.com. These four types of metadata are compared with regard to object of the description, functions, scope, number of copies examined, collective vs. individual creation, standardization, authority control, evidence, amount of descriptive detail, degression, time span the data is intended to last, and degree of evaluation.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.307-327
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.04
0.04302527 = product of:
0.12907581 = sum of:
0.112317875 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112317875 = score(doc=602,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.016757935 = product of:
0.03351587 = sum of:
0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03351587 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.04
0.04302527 = product of:
0.12907581 = sum of:
0.112317875 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112317875 = score(doc=2609,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.016757935 = product of:
0.03351587 = sum of:
0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03351587 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.04
0.04254624 = product of:
0.12763871 = sum of:
0.10848678 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10848678 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.019151928 = product of:
0.038303856 = sum of:
0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038303856 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Thorburn, C.: Cataloging remote electronic journals and databases (1992)
0.04
0.041548572 = product of:
0.12464571 = sum of:
0.060645953 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060645953 = score(doc=5526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
0.06399976 = product of:
0.12799951 = sum of:
0.12799951 = weight(_text_:addresses in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12799951 = score(doc=5526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.63259816 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- With the advent of electronic publications, the cataloguer is no longer providing access to just the library's archives. Addresses the changing role of the catalogue librarian and provides examples of how the cataloguer can provide access to electronic journals using today's technology and formats
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.04
0.040248025 = product of:
0.12074407 = sum of:
0.10398614 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398614 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.016757935 = product of:
0.03351587 = sum of:
0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03351587 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.1, S.21-31
-
Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005)
0.04
0.040248025 = product of:
0.12074407 = sum of:
0.10398614 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398614 = score(doc=128,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.016757935 = product of:
0.03351587 = sum of:
0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03351587 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.04
0.040248025 = product of:
0.12074407 = sum of:
0.10398614 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398614 = score(doc=4309,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.016757935 = product of:
0.03351587 = sum of:
0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03351587 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Johns, C.: Cataloging Internet resources : an administrative view (1997)
0.04
0.039937623 = product of:
0.11981286 = sum of:
0.06861306 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06861306 = score(doc=3402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.051199805 = product of:
0.10239961 = sum of:
0.10239961 = weight(_text_:addresses in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10239961 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.50607854 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the OCLC InterCat Project, to create bibliographic records for Internet sources and to which over 230 libraries participated initially. Focuses on some of the administrative issues involved and describes the experiences of California University at Santa Barbara Library so as to allay concerns and provide practical and positive advice. Addresses the process of decision making, planning and implementation of the OCLC InternCat Project from an administrator's perspective
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 1(1997) no.1, S.17-23
-
Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991)
0.04
0.039473403 = product of:
0.118420206 = sum of:
0.084904335 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084904335 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
0.03351587 = product of:
0.06703174 = sum of:
0.06703174 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06703174 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
-
Huang, J.; Haynes, K.J.M.: ¬The issue of word division in cataloging Chinese language titles (2004)
0.04
0.039443046 = product of:
0.11832914 = sum of:
0.07352931 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352931 = score(doc=5529,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
0.04479983 = product of:
0.08959966 = sum of:
0.08959966 = weight(_text_:addresses in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08959966 = score(doc=5529,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.03533926 = queryNorm
0.44281873 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) no.1, S.27-41
