Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Martin, J.M.: Records, responsibility, and power : an overview of cataloging ethics (2021) 0.02 
    0.020113988 = product of:
  0.12068392 = sum of:
    0.12068392 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12068392 = score(doc=708,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.8665075 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Ethics are principles which provide a framework for making decisions that best reflect a set of values. Cataloging carries power, so ethical decision-making is crucial. Because cataloging requires decision-making in areas that differ from other library work, cataloging ethics are a distinct subset of library ethics. Cataloging ethics draw on the primary values of serving the needs of users and providing access to materials. Cataloging ethics are not new, but they have received increased attention since the 1970s. Major current issues in cataloging ethics include the creation of a code of ethics; ongoing debate on the appropriate role of neutrality in cataloging misleading materials and in subject heading lists and classification schemes; how and to what degree considerations of privacy and self-determination should shape authority work; and whether or not our current cataloging codes are sufficiently user-focused.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458 Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.281-304
  2. Chan, M.; Daniels, J.; Furger, S.; Rasmussen, D.; Shoemaker, E.; Snow, K.: ¬The development and future of the cataloguing code of ethics (2022) 0.02 
    0.01582099 = product of:
  0.09492593 = sum of:
    0.09492593 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09492593 = score(doc=1149,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The Cataloguing Code of Ethics, released in January 2021, was the product of a multi-national, multi-year endeavor by the Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee to create a useful framework for the discussion of cataloging ethics. The six Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee members, based in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, recount the efforts of the group and the cataloging community leading up to the release of the Code, as well as provide their thoughts on the challenges of creating the document, lessons learned, and the future of the Code.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.8, p.786-806
  3. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.; Leide, J.E.: Tensions in cataloging : observations on standards and implementation (1998) 0.01 
    0.014150723 = product of:
  0.084904335 = sum of:
    0.084904335 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084904335 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  4. Shoemaker, E.: No one can whistle a symphony : seeking a catalogers' code of ethics (2015) 0.01 
    0.008576633 = product of:
  0.051459797 = sum of:
    0.051459797 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051459797 = score(doc=2370,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.36948 = fieldWeight in 2370, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2370)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper examines the limited literature about ethics of cataloging in order to elucidate the kind of situations catalogers face with minimal ethical guidance, and the questions those situations raise for the profession. Existing codes of ethics for library staff offer only peripheral guidelines for catalogers, leaving them adrift when ethical issues arise. Ultimately the lack of a clear code of ethics for information organization reinforces existing mystification around the role of catalogers within the library and causes difficulty in justifying decisions to supervisors and administrators. While ALA has a professionally accepted code of ethics, and ALCTS has a supplement to it, these codes are inadequate to clarify and guide cataloging work. Two vastly different approaches to a code of ethics for catalogers are considered for both their strengths and weaknesses. The author will make recommendations about what a code of ethics for catalogers should include, and who should be responsible for creating a new code for the profession.
  5. Lindsay J.: Policing the Internet? (1997) 0.01 
    0.006399976 = product of:
  0.038399857 = sum of:
    0.038399857 = product of:
      0.07679971 = sum of:
        0.07679971 = weight(_text_:addresses in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679971 = score(doc=2448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.37955892 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The development of digital information and communication technologies will change the nature of political debate and the role of professional societies. Develops some of these issues, especially pornography, in consideration of policing the Internet. Addresses the following 4 aspects of pornography: children and access; accidentally finding; morphing; and the meaning of words. Distinguishes 5 different contexts where different professional judgements have to be made: the workplace; the university; the school; public spaces; and the home. Points to the new ethical professional considerations which arise from the development of technology. Suggests that there is a special role for professional societies in working out policies for policing the virtual society that is the Internet
  6. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.01 
    0.006399976 = product of:
  0.038399857 = sum of:
    0.038399857 = product of:
      0.07679971 = sum of:
        0.07679971 = weight(_text_:addresses in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679971 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.37955892 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In this paper we discuss some ethical issues and challenges of the use of algorithms on the web from the perspective of knowledge organization. We review some of the problems that these algorithms and the filter bubbles pose for the users. We contextualize these issues within the user-based approaches to knowledge organization in a larger sense. We review some of the technologies that have been developed to counter these problems as well as initiatives from the knowledge organization field. We conclude with the necessity of adopting a critical and ethical stance towards the use of algorithms on the web and the need for an education in knowledge organization that addresses these issues.
  7. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.0053333133 = product of:
  0.03199988 = sum of:
    0.03199988 = product of:
      0.06399976 = sum of:
        0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06399976 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
  8. Capurro, R.: Information ethics for and from Africa (2008) 0.01 
    0.0053333133 = product of:
  0.03199988 = sum of:
    0.03199988 = product of:
      0.06399976 = sum of:
        0.06399976 = weight(_text_:addresses in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06399976 = score(doc=1869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20233937 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.31629908 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7256255 = idf(docFreq=391, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The first part of this article deals with some initiatives concerning the role of information ethics for Africa, such as the New Partnership for Africa's Development, United Nations Information Communications Technology (ICT), and the African Information Society Initiative particularly since the World Summit on the Information Society. Information Ethics from Africa is a young academic field, and not much has been published so far on the impact of ICT on African societies and cultures from a philosophical perspective. The second part of the article analyzes some recent research on this matter particularly with regard to the concept of ubuntu. Finally, the article addresses some issues of the African Conference on Information Ethics held February 3-5, 2007, in Pretoria, South Africa.[The following essay is adapted from a keynote address delivered at the Africa Information Ethics Conference in Pretoria, South Africa, February 5-7, 2007. Under the patronage of UNESCO, sponsored by the South African government, and organized with assistance from the Department of Information Science at the University of Pretoria, the School of Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the supporters and members of the International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE), the theme of the conference was Ethical Challenges in the Information Age: The Joy of Sharing Knowledge. The full version of the address as well as selected articles from the conference were published in Vol. 7 of ICIE's online journal, International Review of Information Ethics (for more information, visit http://icie.zkm.de)]
  9. Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.; Fernández-Molina, J.C.; Pinho, F.A.; Oliveira Milani, S.: Ethics in the knowledge organization environment : an overview of values and problems in the LIS literature (2008) 0.01 
    0.0050538294 = product of:
  0.030322976 = sum of:
    0.030322976 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030322976 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Reflections on Information Science have been focused mostly on information access and dissemination, not on ethical aspects of knowledge organization and representation (KOR). This leads us to investigate the existence of ethical values - and problems - which have impact on this field, especially since they are not discussed, although they are revealed in everyday practice. Therefore, and trying to contribute to a further reflection on the lack of literature on ethics in KOR, this paper analyses the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology JASIST, Journal of Documentation, Knowledge Organization, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, The Indexer and Ethics and Information Technology in the period between 1995 and 2004. The results reveal two complementary dimensions: one concerning the respect of diversity and the other concerning the specificity warrant. The latter, which may prove the relevance of the theoretical principles announced by Hudon (1997), Beghtol (2002, 2005) and Garcia Gutierrez (2002), relative to a transcultural ethics of mediation that reflects diversity (fitted with a precision that, many times, passes by the dimension of multilingualism), making use of tools that may provide cultural warrant to knowledge representation.
  10. Tran, Q.-T.: Standardization and the neglect of museum objects : an infrastructure-based approach for inclusive integration of cultural artifacts (2023) 0.01 
    0.0050538294 = product of:
  0.030322976 = sum of:
    0.030322976 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030322976 = score(doc=1136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13927627 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03533926 = queryNorm
        0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 1136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1136)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The paper examines the integration of born-digital and digitized content into an outdated classification system within the Museum of European Cultures in Berlin. It underscores the predicament encountered by smaller to medium-sized cultural institutions as they navigate between adhering to established knowl­edge management systems and preserving an expanding array of contemporary cultural artifacts. The perspective of infrastructure studies is employed to scrutinize the representation of diverse viewpoints and voices within the museum's collections. The study delves into museum personnel's challenges in cataloging and classifying ethnographic objects utilizing a numerical-alphabetical categorization scheme from the 1930s. It presents an analysis of the limitations inherent in this method, along with its implications for the assimilation of emerging forms of born-digital and digitized objects. Through an exploration of the case of category 74, as observed at the Museum of European Cultures, the study illustrates the complexities of replacing pre-existing systems due to their intricate integration into the socio-technical components of the museum's information infrastructure. The paper reflects on how resource-constrained cultural institutions can take a proactive and ethical approach to knowl­edge management, re-evaluating their knowl­edge infrastructure to promote inclusion and ensure adaptability.
  11. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  12. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  13. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  14. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  15. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.00 
    0.003191988 = product of:
  0.019151928 = sum of:
    0.019151928 = product of:
      0.038303856 = sum of:
        0.038303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038303856 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  16. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00 
    0.0027929894 = product of:
  0.016757935 = sum of:
    0.016757935 = product of:
      0.03351587 = sum of:
        0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03351587 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  17. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00 
    0.0027929894 = product of:
  0.016757935 = sum of:
    0.016757935 = product of:
      0.03351587 = sum of:
        0.03351587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03351587 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  18. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00 
    0.0019949926 = product of:
  0.011969955 = sum of:
    0.011969955 = product of:
      0.02393991 = sum of:
        0.02393991 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02393991 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  19. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019949926 = product of:
  0.011969955 = sum of:
    0.011969955 = product of:
      0.02393991 = sum of:
        0.02393991 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02393991 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  20. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.0013964947 = product of:
  0.008378968 = sum of:
    0.008378968 = product of:
      0.016757935 = sum of:
        0.016757935 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016757935 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123752065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03533926 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes