Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

0.022595724 = product of:
  0.101680756 = sum of:
    0.07692243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07692243 = score(doc=5507,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
    0.024758326 = weight(_text_:data in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024758326 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Starting points for cataloging and bibliographic control are assumptions that "the goal of libraries is to serve their patrons," and that documents should be dentifiable individually as well as grouped with related items in an array from which patrons can choose what they wish. But, like all human endeavors, libraries and the world around them do not stand still. Ranganathan observed that "the library is a growing organism," which prompts us to consider change a fundamental value. Years later, Marshall McLuhan observed that "the medium is the message," highlighting the power and impact of physical form on the information it contained. Despite the author's strongly held belief in the value of standards and uniformity, which has made the exchange of computerized bibliographic data possible, she suggests libraries must move beyond accepting those values unconditionally to a new position in which customization assumes a higher priority. She looks to the world of commerce to explore potentially useful new approaches to cataloging and metadata.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.71-86

0.016556656 = product of:
  0.07450495 = sum of:
    0.04532698 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04532698 = score(doc=5417,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3079 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
    0.029177967 = weight(_text_:data in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029177967 = score(doc=5417,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Reviews the setting in which nonprint materials collections have been housed and used, namely, the academy, and its traditions of collecting these materials. Compares older data on the state of nonelectronic nonprint media collections in academic libraries with more recent reports and freshly-collected data obtained in 2000 at the Eighth Biennial Conference of Online Audiovisual Catalogers, to see if any trends are discernible. Then, superimposes findings from a review of recent literature on the impact of the Internet on collection development and interprets what it indicates about the collection of electronic resources. Finds that traditional nonprint materials have not gained an important share of collections while newer electronic resources have achieved an important collection share in just a few years, and it is increasing. The developments facilitate the work of the institution and confer a positive value on librarians doing the job. Attention to materials in older forms of nonprint media continues to shrink as some become obsolete and others are digitized, crossing over into the world of electronic resources. If the trend to digitize traditional nonprint materials continues, it should have a positive effect on the accessibility and potential use of all media by scholars and teachers alike.

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The audiovisual cataloging current; Part II"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 31(2001) nos.3/4, S.297-311

0.01589444 = product of:
  0.07152498 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
    0.020243352 = product of:
      0.040486705 = sum of:
        0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040486705 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.013513895 = product of:
  0.12162505 = sum of:
    0.12162505 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12162505 = score(doc=5448,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.8261824 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Describes and analyzes the following three issues which elicit strong but divergent views among cataloging faculty, students, and practitioners, and seem to have done so for as long as people have been writing about cataloging education: (1) practice versus theory in cataloging education; (2) dividing book and nonbook cataloging into separate classes versus teaching the cataloging of all materials in a single class; and (3) what setting is best for teaching cataloging-formal graduate school courses, on the job training, or continuing education offerings. Speculates on how these issues may play out in the future as cataloging education continues to evolve in the 21st century.

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.15-29

0.01120559 = product of:
  0.050425157 = sum of:
    0.033919606 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033919606 = score(doc=339,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.23041128 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
    0.01650555 = weight(_text_:data in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01650555 = score(doc=339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Content

What is metadata? - Metadata schemas & their relationships to particular communities - Library and information-related metadata schemas - Creating library metadata for monographic materials - Creating library metadata for continuing materials - Integrating library metadata into local cataloging and bibliographic - databases - Digital collections/digital libraries - Archiving & preserving digital materials - Impact of digital resources on library services - Future possibilities

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.

LCSH

Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
Machine / readable bibliographic data formats

Subject

Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
Machine / readable bibliographic data formats

0.008546937 = product of:
  0.07692243 = sum of:
    0.07692243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07692243 = score(doc=7251,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 7251, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7251)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.008546937 = product of:
  0.07692243 = sum of:
    0.07692243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07692243 = score(doc=348,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Once collections of microcomputer software are established in a library, they grow like wildfire, requiring bibliographic control. Control should have been furnished by AACR2, however, Chapter 9, designed to deal with macroor minicomputer software, was difficult to apply to microcomputer software. Responding to demand from the field, a Task Force of ALA's Committee Cataloging: Description and Access devised Guidelines for Using AACR2 Chapter 9 for Cataloging Microcomputer Software, which was approved at the 1984 Midwinter Conference and is now available for purchase from RTSD. The Guidelines deal with three problems raised by application of Chapter 9 to microcomputer software: teminology; description of the physical manifestation of an item; and notes describing related hardware. A fourth problem concerns which materials are covered by the Guidelines. Each of these is explored and evaluated.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.3, S.49-56

0.007122448 = product of:
  0.06410203 = sum of:
    0.06410203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06410203 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Footnote

Rez. in: Wilson library bulletin 1993, Dec., S.84-85 (N. Stevens); Information technology and libraries 13(1994) no.1, S.79 (L.F. Franklin); Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.131-134 (C. Myall)

0.005697958 = product of:
  0.051281624 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.003561224 = product of:
  0.032051016 = sum of:
    0.032051016 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032051016 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.23-36