Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.016390251 = product of:
  0.07375613 = sum of:
    0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04487142 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
    0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028884713 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.343-361

0.01632773 = product of:
  0.07347478 = sum of:
    0.038461216 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038461216 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
    0.03501356 = weight(_text_:data in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03501356 = score(doc=242,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

This article discusses how various controlled vocabularies, classification schemes and thesauri can serve as some of the building blocks of the Semantic Web. These vocabularies have been developed over the course of decades, and can be put to great use in the development of robust web services and Semantic Web technologies. The article covers how initial collaboration between the Semantic Web, Library and Metadata communities are creating partnerships to complete work in this area. It then discusses some cores principles of authority control before talking more specifically about subject and genre vocabularies and name authority. It is hoped that future systems for internationally shared authority data will link the world's authority data from trusted sources to benefit users worldwide. Finally, the article looks at how encoding and markup of vocabularies can help ensure compatibility with the current and future state of Semantic Web development and provides examples of how this work can help improve the findability and navigation of information on the World Wide Web.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) nos.3/4, S.47-68

0.015148018 = product of:
  0.06816608 = sum of:
    0.055513985 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055513985 = score(doc=191,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.37709895 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
    0.012652095 = product of:
      0.02530419 = sum of:
        0.02530419 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02530419 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.

0.014101727 = product of:
  0.12691554 = sum of:
    0.12691554 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12691554 = score(doc=5854,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.86212003 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

The conceptual model known as "FRBR" (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) reminds us of the basic elements in describing materials in the bibliographic universe, the inter-relationships, and the fundamental user tasks that we are trying to address when we create library catalogs. This model provides a new perspective on cataloging that should influence the design of future systems, cataloging codes, and cataloging practices. This paper explores current activities to utilize the FRBR model within cataloging principles, cataloging codes, and cataloging systems, and offers questions, visions, and suggests some next steps.

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4

0.011148395 = product of:
  0.10033555 = sum of:
    0.10033555 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10033555 = score(doc=575,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.3/4, S.3-38

0.009971427 = product of:
  0.08974284 = sum of:
    0.08974284 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08974284 = score(doc=6461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 6461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6461)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.0070508635 = product of:
  0.06345777 = sum of:
    0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06345777 = score(doc=5433,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5433, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5433)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Barbara B. Tillett discusses her career, including her roles as Director, Integrated Library System Program Office, and Chief, Cataloging Policy and Support Office, at the Library of Congress, and her work as a researcher in the area of bibliographic relationships. Topics include the following: current ILS functionality, benefits, and losses; LC's activities in digital futures planning; development of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records; her role in the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, her part in writing proposals and responses to proposals sent to JSC, and JSC initiatives of the past few years; her work in IFLA and other international organizations and projects; the possible development of a connection between existing international authority files; and other aspects of the emerging internationalization in library catalogs.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.3, S.3-30

0.006043597 = product of:
  0.054392375 = sum of:
    0.054392375 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054392375 = score(doc=5510,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.101-119

0.005697958 = product of:
  0.051281624 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=6686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

A bibliographic relationship is an association between two or more bibliographic items or works. In an effort to provide the theoretical base for a conceptual model of the library catalog, past and future, the bibliographic relationship is examined here in detail. In this first of a series of reports, a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships is derived from an analysis of cataloging rules and types of bibliographic items.

0.005697958 = product of:
  0.051281624 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

The realm of conceptual modeling of the bibliographic universe presents another view of the theoretical foundations of bibliographic relationships as reflected in cataloging rules and practices. Linking devices used to indicate bibliographic relationships in past and present catalogs will continue to evolve wich changes in technologies that are used to create catalogs.

0.0051260465 = product of:
  0.04613442 = sum of:
    0.04613442 = weight(_text_:data in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04613442 = score(doc=2288,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.39059696 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Bibliographic data is used to describe resources held in the collections of libraries, archives and museums. That data is mostly available on the Web today and mostly as linked data. Also on the Web are the controlled vocabulary systems of name authority files, like the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), classification systems, and subject terms. These systems offer their own linked data to potentially help users find the information they want - whether at their local library or anywhere in the world that is willing to make their resources available. We have found it beneficial to merge authority data for names on a global level, as the entities are relatively clear. That is not true for subject concepts and terminology that have categorisation systems developed according to varying principles and schemes and are in multiple languages. Rather than requiring everyone in the world to use the same categorisation/classification system in the same language, we know that the Web offers us the opportunity to add descriptors assigned around the world using multiple systems from multiple perspectives to identify our resources. Those descriptors add value to refine searches, help users worldwide and share globally what each library does locally.

0.0049857134 = product of:
  0.04487142 = sum of:
    0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04487142 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx

0.0032094126 = product of:
  0.028884713 = sum of:
    0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028884713 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

RDA was created in response to complaints about the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, especially the call for a more international, principle-based content standard that takes the perspective of the conceptual models of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) and FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data). The past and ongoing process for continuous improvement to RDA is through the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (known as the JSC, but recently renamed the RDA Steering Committee - RSC) to make RDA even more international and principle-based.