Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

0.012741022 = product of:
  0.1146692 = sum of:
    0.1146692 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1146692 = score(doc=5492,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Jean Weihs, Nancy B. Olson, and Verna Urbanski discuss their careers as catalog librarians and educators. Topics covered include the development of audiovisual cataloging standards from the late 1960s to 2002, the impact of audiovisual cataloging practice on the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), implications of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging education, and the future of cataloging as a professional activity.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.1, S.3-23

0.01120559 = product of:
  0.050425157 = sum of:
    0.033919606 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033919606 = score(doc=339,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.23041128 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
    0.01650555 = weight(_text_:data in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01650555 = score(doc=339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Content

What is metadata? - Metadata schemas & their relationships to particular communities - Library and information-related metadata schemas - Creating library metadata for monographic materials - Creating library metadata for continuing materials - Integrating library metadata into local cataloging and bibliographic - databases - Digital collections/digital libraries - Archiving & preserving digital materials - Impact of digital resources on library services - Future possibilities

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.

LCSH

Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
Machine / readable bibliographic data formats

Subject

Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
Machine / readable bibliographic data formats

0.00805813 = product of:
  0.07252317 = sum of:
    0.07252317 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07252317 = score(doc=5407,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 5407, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5407)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The audiovisual cataloging current; Part II"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 31(2001) nos.3/4, S.159-187

0.007122448 = product of:
  0.06410203 = sum of:
    0.06410203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06410203 = score(doc=5780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 5780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5780)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

0.0070508635 = product of:
  0.06345777 = sum of:
    0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06345777 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

While directions for the use of "germane terms for the physical medium of the work" appeared in the 1964 Rules for Descriptive Cataloging in the Library of Congress: Phonorecords, most libraries choosing to integrate nonbook materials in their collections, either colour-coded their catalogue cards, or added two-digit media codes to call numbers. The first formalized list of "general material designations" (gmds) - placed immediately following the title proper as an early warning device - was published in 1978 in the second edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. Since their introduction they have been controversial as this investigation of the evolution of material designations explores.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2008) no.4, S.3-24

0.0070508635 = product of:
  0.06345777 = sum of:
    0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06345777 = score(doc=2723,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Even before John Fiske (1878) reminded catalogers of their "duty" to correctly identify authors with the same name, uniform headings had assumed a place and purpose in nineteenth-century catalogs. Rules for names of persons, families, corporate bodies, and places have been developed to ensure consistency of both structure and application. Catalogers agree on the importance of form when creating either uniform headings or uniform titles. Paths diverge at the point of application. Effective collocation by means of uniform titles is entirely dependent on whether or not the option to establish them is exercised. In this article, we explore how the concept and treatment of "uniform title" has evolved within Anglo-American cataloging codes, and is changing within RDA: Resource Description and Access.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 46(2008) no.4, S.362-384

0.005697958 = product of:
  0.051281624 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 40(2005) no.1, S.x-xx

0.0049857134 = product of:
  0.04487142 = sum of:
    0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04487142 = score(doc=776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2007) no.2, S.3-18

0.0049857134 = product of:
  0.04487142 = sum of:
    0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04487142 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 46(2008) no.2, S.201-220

0.0044985227 = product of:
  0.040486705 = sum of:
    0.040486705 = product of:
      0.08097341 = sum of:
        0.08097341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08097341 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

2. 8.2001 8:55:22

0.0032094126 = product of:
  0.028884713 = sum of:
    0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 1419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028884713 = score(doc=1419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1419)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Reports a study of Canadian libraries to determine the extent of the application of codes and standards for bibliographic cataloguing records for facilitating the sharing of cataloguing records. The research examined results of a 1992 national survey of Canadian libraries to determine the pattern of use of AACR2R; cataloguing rules for different formats of library materials in various sizes and types of libraries. Analysis of data suggests that smaller libraries with collection sizes of less than 100.000 volumes were less likely than larger libraries to be record contributors. Those cataloguing agencies that were contributing to potentially derivable copy tended to use AACR2R in the majority of cases, perhaps suggesting that the quality of original records being created by self selected respondents to the survey were largely to current standard