Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

0.022584522 = product of:
  0.101630345 = sum of:
    0.06661678 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06661678 = score(doc=5577,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.45251876 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
    0.03501356 = weight(_text_:data in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03501356 = score(doc=5577,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Standardization of subject access to bibliographic information systems is an important factor in national and international networking, cooperation, and exchange of bibliographic data. Standards, guidelines, and rules are needed to ensure consistency and quality in the design, development and application of indexing languages to documents and their citations. This paper defines the terms "standards" and "guidelines" as they apply to subject analysis used in library catalogs and bibliographic databases. It identifies and discusses the most important national and international "standards" that influence subject access to bibliographic data. Included are the tools of subject cataloging which have become standards in their own right, as well as formally prepared and approved guidelines. Each "standard" or "guideline" is described in terms of its origins, characteristics, and control and its importance in the design of bibliographic retrieval systems. Emphasis is given to the importance of the relationship between alphabetic and systematic access.

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.155-176

0.016588667 = product of:
  0.074649006 = sum of:
    0.062269844 = weight(_text_:germany in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062269844 = score(doc=6091,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22275731 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.2795412 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
    0.012379163 = weight(_text_:data in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012379163 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.10480815 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Content

Darin auch Berichte über die deutschen Beiträge: "The third paper by Magda Heiner-Freiling, of the Deutsche Bibliothek and Patrice Landry of the Swiss National Library focuses on "The Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for the Organization of the National Bibliographies: Switzerland and Germany/Austria." It discusses the reasons that led to the use of DDC for this purpose, and deals with the difficulties of adopting a common approach using the Second Dewey Summary (100 divisions). It also describes the challenges for the three libraries of incorporating German requirements into the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie. Their concerns have been brought about by the introduction of national bibliographies to the web environment and the need to "undertake studies on how to bring electronic documents under bibliographic control." The issues were intensified by the need to arrange national bibliographies in a "userfriendly" way and to ensure efficient subject access to records. In addition there had been "a long-standing IFLA and UNESCO recommendation to arrange bibliography according to an international classification scheme." These events provided the background for the decision by the three libraries to work together to produce a common Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) arrangement for the national bibliographies of Austria, Germany and Switzerland. The position of each library is described. The Swiss National Library undertook a major reorganization of its operations and structures which included a study to select a classification scheme for its collection - a study which also looked at the national bibliography. For the Swiss national bibliography, this evaluation led to the replacement of an indexing system based on UDC with the Dewey Second Summary (100 Divisions) with modifications for Swiss history and geography. In 2004 Die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB) decided "to use a new scheme based on DDC" for the new Deutsche Nationalbibliografie (DNB) and the Austrian national bibliography followed suit in the same year. These moves can be attributed to two factors. The first was the impending publication of a German translation of DDC. Secondly, since 1982 the three libraries had been using two different systems, a situation that placed constraints on the exchange of data for use by the bibliographies. There was growing international acceptance of DDC and the change to DDC would improve bibliographic services and facilitate cooperation with foreign national libraries.

0.009971427 = product of:
  0.08974284 = sum of:
    0.08974284 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08974284 = score(doc=5413,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 5413, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5413)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) no.1, S.3-21

0.008546937 = product of:
  0.07692243 = sum of:
    0.07692243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07692243 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.95-104

0.00805813 = product of:
  0.07252317 = sum of:
    0.07252317 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07252317 = score(doc=538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Subject access to information is recognized as one of the most important features of information storage and retrieval systems. It is a feature which requires information professionals to have expertise in retrieval, subject cataloging, classification, indexing and system design. This essay examines the knowledge base needed for professional careers in the subject control of information. It identifies some of the problems involved in education and training graduates for working in this area and attempts to pose some solutions to these problems

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.4, S.57-67

0.007122448 = product of:
  0.06410203 = sum of:
    0.06410203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06410203 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?": Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.1-9.

0.005697958 = product of:
  0.051281624 = sum of:
    0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051281624 = score(doc=646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=646)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.329-342

0.0039362074 = product of:
  0.035425868 = sum of:
    0.035425868 = product of:
      0.070851736 = sum of:
        0.070851736 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070851736 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75

0.0036679 = product of:
  0.0330111 = sum of:
    0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0330111 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037353165 = queryNorm
        0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

This paper describes a survey of subject analysis research over the ten year period 1988 to 1998. Data are drawn from the 'research environment' encompassing publications, conference papers, major bibliographic resources in the field of Library and Information Science and selective searches of the Internet. Findings reveal major and minor areas of research activity. Trends and developments are identified and conclusions drawn. Strengths and weaknesses in the approaches taken to subject analysis research are discussed and suggestions for improvements are made with a view to future research directions

0.003373892 = product of:
  0.030365027 = sum of:
    0.030365027 = product of:
      0.060730055 = sum of:
        0.060730055 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060730055 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:17:00

0.0019681037 = product of:
  0.017712934 = sum of:
    0.017712934 = product of:
      0.035425868 = sum of:
        0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035425868 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

27.12.2008 15:56:22

0.0019681037 = product of:
  0.017712934 = sum of:
    0.017712934 = product of:
      0.035425868 = sum of:
        0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035425868 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 2.2013 12:09:50