Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.02
    0.024846204 = product of:
      0.11180791 = sum of:
        0.10168624 = weight(_text_:germany in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10168624 = score(doc=3219,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22275731 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.4564889 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
        0.010121676 = product of:
          0.020243352 = sum of:
            0.020243352 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020243352 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    "Ein kleines Stück von GS 1 Germany fällt Verbrauchern eigentlich jeden Tag in die Hände. Auf Wasserflaschen, Gurkengläsern, Müsliriegeln oder Ringbüchern ist das Kölner Unternehmen schwarz auf weiß vertreten, weil es Herr über die Vergabe des Strichcodes ist. "Seit 30 Jahren verteilt GS 1 Germany an anfragende Unternehmen so genannte Internationale Lokationsnummern (ILN)" sagt Geschäftsführer Jörg Pretzel. Bis zu 300 dieser Lizenzen mit den Anfangsziffern 400 bis 440 vergibt GS 1 Germany pro Monat, insgesamt sind 125.000 auf dem Markt. Große Konzerne wie Henkel oder Metro lassen sich ebenso eine Nummer zuteilen wie kleine regionale Betriebe. Denn an einer ILN können bis zu 10 000 Strichcodes (EAN-Nummern) hängen, die das Unternehmen auf ein Produkt aufdrucken und auf den Markt bringen kann. Doch auch eine kleinere Bürogemeinschaft kann sich eine Nummer sichern, um beispielsweise ihr Inventar mit den acht- bis 13-stelligen Strichcodes zu sichern. Dabei richtet sich die Lizenzgebühr für eine ILN-Nummer nach dem Umsatz des Unternehmens. Die Spannen liegt zwischen 65 Euro und 15 000 Euro", erläutert Referent Thomas Rosenstein. Die zu gleichen Teilen von Handel und Industrie getragene Firma war bislang unter dem Namen Centrale für Coorganisation (CCG) bekannt. Wie die Partner in den Nachbarländern firmiert sie künftig unter GS 1 und dem jeweiligen Ländernamen, um die Internationalität der Initiative herauszustellen.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  2. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.02
    0.01589444 = product of:
      0.07152498 = sum of:
        0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051281624 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
        0.020243352 = product of:
          0.040486705 = sum of:
            0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040486705 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  3. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.00
    0.0042734686 = product of:
      0.038461216 = sum of:
        0.038461216 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038461216 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
  4. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.00
    0.0039362074 = product of:
      0.035425868 = sum of:
        0.035425868 = product of:
          0.070851736 = sum of:
            0.070851736 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070851736 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  5. Craven, T.C.: Salient node notation (1979) 0.00
    0.0032094126 = product of:
      0.028884713 = sum of:
        0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028884713 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Salient node notation is a technique for decreasing the average length of notation in a classification scheme without sacrficing expressiveness or disturbing the succession of chracteristics of the filing order. Assignment of notation begins at a node of the classification tree other than the root. This salient node may be determined algorithmically, given data on the bias of the collection to be classified, even if only part of the tree has been developed. A dummy value is reserved to indicate upward movement in the tree. The technique is especially applicable to classification schemes for spevialized collections and to facets such as space in which the biases of human existence are especially prominent
  6. Satija, M.P.; Comaroni, J.P.: Beyond classification: book numbers (1992) 0.00
    0.0022924377 = product of:
      0.02063194 = sum of:
        0.02063194 = weight(_text_:data in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02063194 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Book numbers, introduction. - Debate over the usefulness of book numbers. - History of book numbers. - Chronological book numbers. - Biscoe's chronological book numbers. - Brown's extended data table. - Colong book numbers. - Rider's book numbers. - Merrill's book numbers. - Appendices: 1) Chronology of book numbers: 2) Bibliography of 181 references in chronological order
  7. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.00
    0.001686946 = product of:
      0.015182514 = sum of:
        0.015182514 = product of:
          0.030365027 = sum of:
            0.030365027 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365027 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14

Years

Languages

Types

Classifications