Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Dodd, S.A.: Cataloging machine-readable data files : an interpretive manual (1982) 0.04
    0.037463434 = product of:
      0.16858545 = sum of:
        0.10256325 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10256325 = score(doc=4176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 4176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4176)
        0.0660222 = weight(_text_:data in 4176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0660222 = score(doc=4176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 4176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4176)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  2. Choi, N.; Joo, S.: Booklovers' world : an examination of factors affecting continued usage of social cataloging sites (2016) 0.02
    0.023429101 = product of:
      0.10543095 = sum of:
        0.084799014 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084799014 = score(doc=3224,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.57602817 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.02063194 = weight(_text_:data in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02063194 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Little is known about what factors influence users' continued use of social cataloging sites. This study therefore examines the impacts of key factors from theories of information systems (IS) success and sense of community (SOC) on users' continuance intention in the social cataloging context. Data collected from an online survey of 323 social cataloging users provide empirical support for the research model. The findings indicate that both information quality (IQ) and system quality (SQ) are significant predictors of satisfaction and SOC, which in turn lead to users' intentions to continue using these sites. In addition, SOC was found to affect continuance intention not only directly, but also indirectly through satisfaction. Theoretically, this study draws attention to a largely unexplored but essential area of research in the social cataloging literature and provides a fundamental basis to understand the determinants of continued social cataloging usage. From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest that social cataloging service providers should constantly focus their efforts on the quality control of their contents and system, and the enhancement of SOC among their users.
  3. Short, M.: Text mining and subject analysis for fiction; or, using machine learning and information extraction to assign subject headings to dime novels (2019) 0.02
    0.020520551 = product of:
      0.09234248 = sum of:
        0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06345777 = score(doc=5481,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
        0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028884713 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes multiple experiments in text mining at Northern Illinois University that were undertaken to improve the efficiency and accuracy of cataloging. It focuses narrowly on subject analysis of dime novels, a format of inexpensive fiction that was popular in the United States between 1860 and 1915. NIU holds more than 55,000 dime novels in its collections, which it is in the process of comprehensively digitizing. Classification, keyword extraction, named-entity recognition, clustering, and topic modeling are discussed as means of assigning subject headings to improve their discoverability by researchers and to increase the productivity of digitization workflows.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.5, S.315-336
    Theme
    Data Mining
  4. Zavalin, V.: Exploration of subject and genre representation in bibliographic metadata representing works of fiction for children and young adults (2024) 0.02
    0.017589044 = product of:
      0.0791507 = sum of:
        0.054392375 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054392375 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.36948 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
        0.024758326 = weight(_text_:data in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024758326 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines subject and genre representation in metadata that describes information resources created for children and young adult audiences. Both quantitative and limited qualitative analyses were applied to the analysis of WorldCat records collected in 2021 and contributed by the Children's and Young Adults' Cataloging Program at the US Library of Congress. This dataset contains records created several years prior to the data collection point and edited by various OCLC member institutions. Findings provide information on the level and patterns of application of these kinds of metadata important for information access, with a focus on the fields, subfields, and controlled vocabularies used. The discussion of results includes a detailed evaluation of genre and subject metadata quality (accuracy, completeness, and consistency).
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.1, p.47-66
  5. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.02
    0.016939184 = product of:
      0.076226324 = sum of:
        0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028884713 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.047341615 = weight(_text_:processing in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047341615 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15121111 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
  6. Hypén, K.: Kirjasampo: rethinking metadata (2014) 0.02
    0.016390251 = product of:
      0.07375613 = sum of:
        0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04487142 = score(doc=1964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1964)
        0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 1964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028884713 = score(doc=1964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1964)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Kirjasampo.fi is a Web service for fiction. It was constructed after rethinking all the phases of metadata production, and is the first Finnish information system for libraries to be built with the tools of the Semantic Web. Kirjasampo is based on a metadata schema for fiction that uses a Resource Description Framework (RDF) data model. A user-friendly annotation editor enables library professionals to save, accumulate, and distribute literary knowledge and tacit information. The goal of Kirjasampo is to describe the contents of literary works based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Content description is done using ontologies, which enable a flexible linking of metadata.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.2, S.156-180
  7. Beck, H.: Zur Klassifikation der Belletristik (1991) 0.01
    0.01304635 = product of:
      0.11741715 = sum of:
        0.11741715 = weight(_text_:germany in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11741715 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22275731 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.52710795 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In the classification of fiction literature in public libraries its presentation on shelves and its depth analysis in card files or selective bibliographies should supplement each other. In the article some less known traditions in the English-language area of thematical classification schemes in Germany of the twenties and since World War II are investigated. Concludingly some principles in the form of theses are stated which should be observed in the subject analysis of fiction lietrature in order to be able to meet fully the multiplicity of readers' requests
  8. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.011834323 = product of:
      0.053254455 = sum of:
        0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0330111 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.020243352 = product of:
          0.040486705 = sum of:
            0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040486705 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037353165 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  9. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: French fiction : LCSH applications (1988) 0.01
    0.011395916 = product of:
      0.10256325 = sum of:
        0.10256325 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10256325 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.2, S.3-24
  10. Hines, T.C.; Winkel, L.: ¬A new information access tool for children's media (1983) 0.01
    0.00805813 = product of:
      0.07252317 = sum of:
        0.07252317 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07252317 = score(doc=5827,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 5827, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5827)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    A new cataloging and information access tool for children's media is proposed, which combines the most useful aspects of library subject-headings lists and thesauri with some unique aspects, and meets for the first time the American Library Association recommen-dations for the subject cataloging of juvenile materials. Computer-based production of such a tool offers considerable economies and opportunities. A project is now under way to produce such a listing
  11. Saarti, J.: ¬The analysis of the information process of fiction : a holistic approach to information processing (2003) 0.01
    0.0074390173 = product of:
      0.066951156 = sum of:
        0.066951156 = weight(_text_:processing in 2683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066951156 = score(doc=2683,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15121111 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 2683, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2683)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    The objective of the paper is to analyse the information (communication) process of fiction in order to increase our understanding of the different actors and factors involved in information processing. The methodology is that of the grounded theory, where previous studies of information process and fiction content representation are compared with the results of an empirical study in which library patrons and library professionals were asked to index and abstract five different kinds of novels.
  12. Moulaison-Sandy, H.; Adkins, D.; Bossaller, J.; Cho, H.: ¬An automated approach to describing fiction : a methodology to use book reviews to identify affect (2021) 0.01
    0.0070508635 = product of:
      0.06345777 = sum of:
        0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06345777 = score(doc=710,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Subject headings and genre terms are notoriously difficult to apply, yet are important for fiction. The current project functions as a proof of concept, using a text-mining methodology to identify affective information (emotion and tone) about fiction titles from professional book reviews as a potential first step in automating the subject analysis process. Findings are presented and discussed, comparing results to the range of aboutness and isness information in library cataloging records. The methodology is likewise presented, and how future work might expand on the current project to enhance catalog records through text-mining is explored.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.794-814
  13. Miller, C.: All new subject access to fiction : how a cultural Zeitgeist with gray hair informed ALA's guidelines . . . (2003) 0.01
    0.006043597 = product of:
      0.054392375 = sum of:
        0.054392375 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054392375 = score(doc=5499,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In 1990, the American Library Association published its Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, Etc. Neither the 1990 Guidelines nor the work's subsequent 2000 edition is terribly concerned with explaining why increased subject access to works of imaginative literature has come to be needed now more than in the baker's century after Cutter first allowed for such access. Inherent to the 1990 Guidelines is the notion that works of imagination have a value such that they deserve to be accessed in more or less the same manner that nonfiction works are accessed, through aboutness as well as whatness. The paper purports that the origins of this change in cataloging policy are far from humble, that they can in fact be located in a broad swath of social historiography and literary criticism.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.2, S.89-97
  14. Denehy, C.C.: Subject cataloguing of fiction (1993) 0.01
    0.005697958 = product of:
      0.051281624 = sum of:
        0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051281624 = score(doc=7211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 7211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7211)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    A subcommittee of the Subject Analysis Committee of the Cataloging and Classification Section, Resources and Technical Services Division of the ALA produced recommendations published in 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama etc.' in 1990. Outlines 4 areas of subject analysis to be applied to fiction: form/genre, character, setting, and topic. Describes the implementation of these guidelines in the US environment and suggests some improvements
  15. Down, N.: Subject access to individual works of fiction : participating in the OCLC/LC Fiction Project (1995) 0.01
    0.005697958 = product of:
      0.051281624 = sum of:
        0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051281624 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.61-69
  16. Ward, M.; Saarti, J.: Reviewing, rebutting, and reimagining fiction classification (2018) 0.01
    0.005697958 = product of:
      0.051281624 = sum of:
        0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051281624 = score(doc=5164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.4, S.317-329
  17. Hayes, S.M.: Use of popular and literary criticism in providing subject access to imaginative literature (2001) 0.00
    0.0049857134 = product of:
      0.04487142 = sum of:
        0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04487142 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.4, S.71-97
  18. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.00
    0.0049857134 = product of:
      0.04487142 = sum of:
        0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04487142 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2002) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  19. Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013) 0.00
    0.0049857134 = product of:
      0.04487142 = sum of:
        0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04487142 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.624-654
  20. Yu, L.; O'Brien, A.: ¬A practical typology of adult fiction borrowers based on their reading habits (1999) 0.00
    0.004764742 = product of:
      0.04288268 = sum of:
        0.04288268 = weight(_text_:data in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04288268 = score(doc=3879,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037353165 = queryNorm
            0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study which applied a typological procedure, developed by Lazairsfeld from the social sciences, to a set of qualitative data on fiction reading habits for the purpose of forming a practical typology of fiction borrowers. The data was collected from a sample of 300 readers in 2 medium sized UK public libraries over a 2 month period. The procedure, using an inductive research approach, first mapped readers along 6 dimensions of reading habits which emerged from the data frequencies of borrowing, the numbers of authors currently read, the literary/recreational orientation of reading, searching approaches usually applied, sureness (confidence) in book selection and then proceeded to reduce the number of combinations formed by these dimensions, based on their relationships. A typology of 7 types of fiction borrowers was devised: readers of particularism; readers of frequent literary pluralism; readers of infrequent literary pluralism; readers of frequent recreational pluralism; readers of infrequent recreational pluralism; readers of frequent universalism; and readers of infrequent universalism