Middleton, C.C.; Dean, J.W.; Gilbertson, M.A.: ¬A process for the original cataloging of theses and dissertations (2015)
0.02
0.023290861 = product of:
0.046581723 = sum of:
0.046581723 = product of:
0.093163446 = sum of:
0.093163446 = weight(_text_:headings in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093163446 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211677 = queryNorm
0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to describe the reasoning, methodology, and impact behind a semi-automated cataloging process for electronic theses and dissertations, and to explain the importance of the retention and addition of cataloger-created metadata. The authors explain an automated process that is initiated by ProQuest and student (author) entered data, and through the addition of metadata by catalogers, including the subject headings, classification number, and so on. The study includes a survey of the public service librarians' perceived usefulness of the cataloger- and ProQuest-generated metadata to describe theses and dissertations.
