Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Howarth, L.C."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Weihs, J.; Howarth, L.C.: Uniform titles from AACR to RDA (2008) 0.03
    0.03293825 = product of:
      0.0658765 = sum of:
        0.0658765 = product of:
          0.131753 = sum of:
            0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.131753 = score(doc=2723,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Even before John Fiske (1878) reminded catalogers of their "duty" to correctly identify authors with the same name, uniform headings had assumed a place and purpose in nineteenth-century catalogs. Rules for names of persons, families, corporate bodies, and places have been developed to ensure consistency of both structure and application. Catalogers agree on the importance of form when creating either uniform headings or uniform titles. Paths diverge at the point of application. Effective collocation by means of uniform titles is entirely dependent on whether or not the option to establish them is exercised. In this article, we explore how the concept and treatment of "uniform title" has evolved within Anglo-American cataloging codes, and is changing within RDA: Resource Description and Access.
  2. Howarth, L.C.; Weihs, J.: Enigma variations : parsing the riddle of main entry and the "rule of three" from AACR2 to RDA (2008) 0.02
    0.023290861 = product of:
      0.046581723 = sum of:
        0.046581723 = product of:
          0.093163446 = sum of:
            0.093163446 = weight(_text_:headings in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093163446 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the ten years since the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, long-standing debates have continued as to whether or not to have a "main entry", and whether or not to exercise the rule of three to limit the number of headings or access points in certain cases. Recent proposals from the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA have recommended a change in "main entry" terminology to "primary access point," and the elimination of the rule of three. This paper explores how and why these shifts have occurred.