Search (127 results, page 1 of 7)

0.08099015 = product of:
  0.1619803 = sum of:
    0.1619803 = sum of:
      0.10647251 = weight(_text_:headings in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10647251 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
      0.0555078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0555078 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Rules regarding cataloguing, subject headings, the way information in bibliographic records is organised and the catalogue's interface, or the way the screen is set up, are barriers to the use of online catalogues by children Describes the background to and implementation of a project to create a child orientation catalogue with a graphical user interface, or one that relies on pictures instead of text, within Denver Public Library in Colorado. Now called the Kid's catalog and commercially available from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries Co., the catalogue's software acts as a front end to a library's regular catalogue

Source

School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25

0.08099015 = product of:
  0.1619803 = sum of:
    0.1619803 = sum of:
      0.10647251 = weight(_text_:headings in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10647251 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
      0.0555078 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0555078 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Uses the results of various user studies to offer some insight into user behaviour in connection with OPAC access points and to explore conditions for subject searching, the difficulties involved and the matching of queries to subject headings. Sums up suggestions for the improvement of subject access to OPACs

Source

Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55

0.040340956 = product of:
  0.08068191 = sum of:
    0.08068191 = product of:
      0.16136383 = sum of:
        0.16136383 = weight(_text_:headings in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16136383 = score(doc=655,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Assigned topical and geographic subject headings from a sample of 3.814 bibliographic records in the University of Michigan Library's catalog were analyzed to determine the degree of match with LCSH, 10th edition and to idetify types of heading conflicts that lend themselves to automatic subject authority control. The findings showed a surprising degree of agreement: 44 percent of headings matched LCSH 10th completely. For headings without subdivisions, the match was 88,4 percent. Since 93,6 percent of the topical subdivisions that did not match LCSH were found on the free-floating lists, some consideration should be given to developing a machine-readable file of free-floating subdivisons for matching purposes.

0.040340956 = product of:
  0.08068191 = sum of:
    0.08068191 = product of:
      0.16136383 = sum of:
        0.16136383 = weight(_text_:headings in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16136383 = score(doc=1066,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Key problems of subject searches in online public access catalogs are that too much may be retrieved and that the display may be arranged in what appears to be an unintuitive and unhelpful manner. A study was undertaken on one large database to determine how often the display of a subject and its modifications and subdivisions extended over more than two screens and what the results on display would be of compressing geographic subdivisions and other modifications. The study then addressed the question of how often the display of a term and its subdivisions was interrupted by the appearance in the display of inverted headings, phrase headings, and headings with parenthetical qualifiers

0.039927192 = product of:
  0.079854384 = sum of:
    0.079854384 = product of:
      0.15970877 = sum of:
        0.15970877 = weight(_text_:headings in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15970877 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.039927192 = product of:
  0.079854384 = sum of:
    0.079854384 = product of:
      0.15970877 = sum of:
        0.15970877 = weight(_text_:headings in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15970877 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.039927192 = product of:
  0.079854384 = sum of:
    0.079854384 = product of:
      0.15970877 = sum of:
        0.15970877 = weight(_text_:headings in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15970877 = score(doc=449,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Central to subject searching is the match between user vocabulary and the headings from Library of Congress Subject-Headings (LCSH) used in a library catalog. This paper evaluates previous matching studies, proposes a detailed list of matching categories, and tests LCSH in a study using these categories. Exact and partial match categories are defined for single LCSH and multiple LCSH matches to user expressions. One no-match category is included. Transaction logs from ORION, UCLA's online Information system, were used to collect user expressions for a comparison of LCSH and user language. Results show that single LCSH headings match user expressions exactly about 47% of the time; that single subject heading matches, including exact matches, comprise 74% of the total; that partial matches, to both single and multiple headings, comprise about 21% of the total; and that no match occurs 5% of the time.

0.03992719 = product of:
  0.07985438 = sum of:
    0.07985438 = product of:
      0.15970875 = sum of:
        0.15970875 = weight(_text_:headings in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15970875 = score(doc=4384,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.64301777 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This short guide is intended to help librarians and OPAC system designers to make decisions about the design of displays of more than one subject heading. The authors stress that they offer guidance rather than standards or prescriptions; their clear prose is cautious and even the number of recommendations is limited. A 12-page introduction contrasts the "structural approach" and "strict alphabetical approach" to filing, showing examples and stating arguments for each. 7 chapters cover display of subdivisions, inverted headings, display of qualified headings, arrangement of numerical headings, display of subjects interfiled with names and titles, punctuation and messages to the user. Within each chapter, questions involving choices between two or more approaches are followed by brief statements of current practice (LC rules, ALA rules, and systems in existing OPACs) extensive examples demonstrating such choices, and arguments for and against each. The authors warn against ever assuming that the user knows the needed subject headings, and acknowledge that the best OPAC design often depends on the setting and on the user's understanding of the system. Although the topic may be beyond the purview of the authoring committee, the discussion here makes one yearn for interactive OPACs that can analyze the user's needs and provide appropriate guidance to whatever system is adopted

Editor

Subcommittee on the Display of Subject Headings in Subject Indexes in OPACs, Subject Analysis Committee, Cataloging and Classification Section, ALCTS, ALA

LCSH

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation

Subject

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation

0.037643716 = product of:
  0.07528743 = sum of:
    0.07528743 = product of:
      0.15057486 = sum of:
        0.15057486 = weight(_text_:headings in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15057486 = score(doc=1503,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.606243 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper recognizes the limitations of the existing file of Library of Congress authority records for subject heading assignment and validation. It makes recommendations for a new machine-readable file of authority records for topical subdivisions and for enhancements to the existing subject authority file. The recommended changes qould enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, the individual components of subdivided headings. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic database forms the basis of the recommendations

0.037643716 = product of:
  0.07528743 = sum of:
    0.07528743 = product of:
      0.15057486 = sum of:
        0.15057486 = weight(_text_:headings in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15057486 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.606243 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper suggests that the cataloging community may be setting its goals too low in its approach to online subject access. Truly effective subject retrieval for online catalog users will not be possible until the Library of Congress gives a higher priority to consistency in the assignment of subject headings. In recognition of the intellectual complexity of LCSH, the paper proposes the appointment of subject specialists to monitor the assignment of subject headings at the Library of Congress.

0.037199963 = product of:
  0.074399926 = sum of:
    0.074399926 = product of:
      0.14879985 = sum of:
        0.14879985 = weight(_text_:headings in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14879985 = score(doc=2549,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5990965 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims at providing a robust, user-friendly and efficient navigation procedure in an online library catalog that is based on semantic information encapsulated within subject headings. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes an interactive navigation procedure inside an online library catalog based on semantic information. The proposed approach is presented through a web-based, prototype application following the most recent trends of the semantic web such as AJAX technology and the web ontology language - OWL for encoding semantics. Findings - According to the proposed method, a GUI interface exposes the hierarchy of the subject headings employed within an OPAC, as well as all stated relations between such headings, as links that the user can follow, effectively traversing the ontology and formulating at the same time the actual query to the underlying OPAC. This act of interactive navigation through the library's assets aids searchers in accurately formulating their queries, by offering broader or narrower concepts for selection or indicating alternative or related concepts they might be initially unaware of. The augmented exposition of inter-relations between concepts provides multiple paths for information retrieval and enables searchers to fulfill their information needs in a faster, more efficient and intuitive manner. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for the development of modern, semantic web applications focused on the library domain. The novel approach of visualizing subject headings could be further extended to visualize a number of other conceptualizations of the library domain. Originality/value - This paper fulfils an identified need to take advantage of the "hidden knowledge" existing within the library domain but, for a number of reasons, is never exposed to the library users.

0.03543319 = product of:
  0.07086638 = sum of:
    0.07086638 = sum of:
      0.046581723 = weight(_text_:headings in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046581723 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.18754686 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.024284663 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024284663 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211677 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."

Source

Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120

0.034577962 = product of:
  0.069155924 = sum of:
    0.069155924 = product of:
      0.13831185 = sum of:
        0.13831185 = weight(_text_:headings in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13831185 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.55686975 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The implementation of our online integrated catalog ACORN at Vanderbilt University Library has been a complex and time-consuming task. The authority control component represents an important portion of the effort. The authority file consists of approximately one-half million name, subject, series, and uniform title headings, the majority of which were supplied to us by a vendor, Blackwell North America (BNA). Authority work has been integrated into our cataloging routine successfully, new headings are being added to our database daily, and extant headings are being validated online. This paper will cover a description of how Vanderbilt selected the Northwestern Online Total Integrated System (NOTIS); the ongoing editing of the authority file following the BNA processing; the interrelationship of Vanderbilt University Library's three processing units, General Technical Services (GTS), Medical Library, and Law Library apropos of the authority function; and some of the policies and procedures drawn up by the Authority Control Coordinator with the assistance of the other librarians in Monograph and Serial Services.

0.03327266 = product of:
  0.06654532 = sum of:
    0.06654532 = product of:
      0.13309065 = sum of:
        0.13309065 = weight(_text_:headings in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13309065 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5358482 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

An experimental online catalog was developed that provided searchers with several different subject searching strategies. Analyses of retrieval test data suggest that searchers expect alphabetical searches to provide lists of assigned subject headings conceptually related to their topics of interest. System designers can now respond to their expectation by incorporating LCSH-mr in online catalogs

0.03327266 = product of:
  0.06654532 = sum of:
    0.06654532 = product of:
      0.13309065 = sum of:
        0.13309065 = weight(_text_:headings in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13309065 = score(doc=3853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5358482 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

3 ways to improve access to monographs are additional subject headings, analytic added entires and contents notes. Focuses on California State University. Describes the project, the CSU-Chico results and advices upon when to add contents notes

0.03293825 = product of:
  0.0658765 = sum of:
    0.0658765 = product of:
      0.131753 = sum of:
        0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.131753 = score(doc=4218,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

LCSH

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Problems, exercises, etc

Subject

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Problems, exercises, etc

0.03293825 = product of:
  0.0658765 = sum of:
    0.0658765 = product of:
      0.131753 = sum of:
        0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.131753 = score(doc=1631,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Amstelveen Public Library in the Netherlands introduced the online Kid's Catalog in 1997 to enable young users to access the library's catalogue. The system was developed in the United States and has been translated into Dutch for use in Amstelveen. The system enables users to access the catalogue through a menu of icons or by typing in author, title and subject headings. The system can recognise typing errors and offer corrected headings. The system is extremely popular both with children and adults

0.03293825 = product of:
  0.0658765 = sum of:
    0.0658765 = product of:
      0.131753 = sum of:
        0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 2775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.131753 = score(doc=2775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 2775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Browse searching of online catalogs and electronic indexes is a popular means of retrieving information, but some subject heading lists are so extensive that browsing them can be difficult and time-consuming. This resaerch tested one way of presenting a browse interface to reduce the amount of scanning of subject headings required. It found that a hierarchical presentation of headings reduced the amount of scanning required by more than 50% without any reduction in the effectiveness of the search. Better browsable displays of this sort can improve the efficiency of searching but appear not to alter effectivenenss

0.028232787 = product of:
  0.056465574 = sum of:
    0.056465574 = product of:
      0.11293115 = sum of:
        0.11293115 = weight(_text_:headings in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11293115 = score(doc=457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.45468226 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.

0.0277539 = product of:
  0.0555078 = sum of:
    0.0555078 = product of:
      0.1110156 = sum of:
        0.1110156 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1110156 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211677 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31