Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × author_ss:"Miller, D."
  1. Miller, D.: Identical in appearance but not in actuality : headings shared by a subject-access and a form/genre access authority list (1997) 0.05
    0.048900623 = product of:
      0.097801246 = sum of:
        0.097801246 = product of:
          0.19560249 = sum of:
            0.19560249 = weight(_text_:headings in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19560249 = score(doc=610,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.7875328 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority records were compared for established headings that are identical in LCSH (18th ed.) and Moving Image Materials (MIM). The Use For, Broader Term, Narrower Term, and Related Term references in the LCSH authority file were compared with their counterparts in MIM, to determine the proportion of duplication existing between them. Fewer that 10% of these reference headings are identical. A qualitative comparison was made of the 'semantic spaces' inhibited by identical headings in different contexts: a general purpose subject access list is compared with a medium specific form and genre access list. It was found that, in many cases, headings that are identical as character strings have markedly differnt meanings in different contexts. The conclusion offered is that, both quantitatively and qualitatively, pairs of identical headings differ sufficiently from each other that the creation of authority records for each usage represents no duplication in any meaningful sense. The striking divergence, in many instances, between semantic spaces poses intellectual questions regarding the differences between the meaning of subjects and of forms and genres
  2. Miller, D.: Ambiguities in the use of certain Library of Congress Subject Headings for form and genre access to moving image materials (1995) 0.03
    0.03293825 = product of:
      0.0658765 = sum of:
        0.0658765 = product of:
          0.131753 = sum of:
            0.131753 = weight(_text_:headings in 5359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.131753 = score(doc=5359,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 5359, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Some LCSH have the potential to be used for either subject or form/genre access. A selection of LCSH, cognates with terms from Moving image materials: Genre terms, was searched in OCLC's OLUC to determine the degrees to which they were used for each of these two types of access. it was discovered that the set of 'subject headings' under study was used for form/genre access between 6% and 99% of the time, with a mean average of just over 50%. The guidance provided to catalogers by information contained in LoC authority records is also discussed
  3. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.01
    0.010407712 = product of:
      0.020815425 = sum of:
        0.020815425 = product of:
          0.04163085 = sum of:
            0.04163085 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04163085 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211677 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92