Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Nicholas, D."
  1. Nicholas, D.; Boydell, L.: BLAISE-LINE : enigma, anomaly or anachronism? (1996) 0.09
    0.08580281 = product of:
      0.15444505 = sum of:
        0.030001212 = product of:
          0.060002424 = sum of:
            0.060002424 = weight(_text_:headings in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060002424 = score(doc=5532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024941156 = score(doc=5532,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
        0.019725773 = weight(_text_:of in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019725773 = score(doc=5532,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
        0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05804818 = score(doc=5532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
        0.02172873 = product of:
          0.04345746 = sum of:
            0.04345746 = weight(_text_:problems in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345746 = score(doc=5532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    BLAISE-LINE provides online access to all of the British Library's major catalogues as well as to other major bibliographies. With its MARC records, Dewey numbers and Library of Congress headings (LCSH), BLAISE-LINE remains a tradtional library oriented online service. Presents the results of a survey of 37 libraries using BLAISE-LINE to find out what users thought of it and how it compared to the more modern systems of enduser, fulltext, CD-ROM and the Internet. The principal uses to which respondents put BLAISE-LINE were bibliographical checking, answering subject enquiries, and obtaining interlibrary loans. The survey also covered frequency of use, ease of use, problems in using the system, cost issues, and training and support. Findings show that professional librarians value the efficiency of BLAISE-LINE above the user friedliness of other systems
  2. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.02
    0.019232173 = product of:
      0.057696518 = sum of:
        0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0125971865 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.018370902 = weight(_text_:of in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018370902 = score(doc=214,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.026728429 = product of:
          0.053456858 = sum of:
            0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053456858 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1840-1851
  3. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.01
    0.014854355 = product of:
      0.044563062 = sum of:
        0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015116624 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
        0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016040152 = score(doc=2680,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study provides evidence on the actual information-seeking behaviour of students in a digital scholarly environment, not what they thought they did. It also compares student information-seeking behaviour with that of other academic communities, and, in some cases, for practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered as part of CIBER's ongoing Virtual Scholar programme. In particular log data from two digital journals libraries, Blackwell Synergy and OhioLINK, and one e-book collection (Oxford Scholarship Online) are utilized. Findings - The study showed a distinctive form of information-seeking behaviour associated with students and differences between them and other members of the academic community. For example, students constituted the biggest users in terms of sessions and pages viewed, and they were more likely to undertake longer online sessions. Undergraduates and postgraduates were the most likely users of library links to access scholarly databases, suggesting an important "hot link" role for libraries. Originality/value - Few studies have focused on the actual (rather than perceived) information-seeking behaviour of students. The study fills that gap.
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.1, S.106-132
  4. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.01
    0.014807222 = product of:
      0.044421665 = sum of:
        0.017815111 = weight(_text_:library in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017815111 = score(doc=228,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
        0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015434646 = score(doc=228,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
        0.011171908 = product of:
          0.022343816 = sum of:
            0.022343816 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022343816 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.3, A.161-162
  5. Williams, P.; Nicholas, D.: ¬The migration of news to the web (1999) 0.01
    0.00977442 = product of:
      0.04398489 = sum of:
        0.01725646 = weight(_text_:of in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01725646 = score(doc=735,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.026728429 = product of:
          0.053456858 = sum of:
            0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053456858 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Virtually all UK and US newspapers and the vast majority of regional and even local titles are now represented on the web. Indeed, the Yahoo news and media directory lists no less than 114 UK newspapers online (as of November 1998). Broadcasters from the BBC and Sky downwards, and all the famous news agencies (Press Association, Reuters etc.) also boast comprehensive Internet services. With such an array of sources available, the future of mass access to the Internet, possibly via TV terminals, suggests that more and more people may soon opt for this medium to receive the bulk of their news information. This paper gives an overview of the characteristics of the medium illustrated with examples of how these are being used to both facilitate and enhance the content and dissemination of the news product. These characteristics include hyperlinking to external information sources, providing archive access to past reports, reader interactivity and other features not possible to incorporate into more passive media such as the hardcopy newspaper. From a survey of UK and US news providers it is clear that American newspapers are exploiting the advantages of web information dissemination to a far greater extent than their British counterparts, with the notable exception of The Electronic Telegraph. UK broadcasters, however, generally appear to have adapted better to the new medium, with the BBC rivaling CNN in its depth and extent of news coverage, use of links and other elements.
  6. Nicholas, D.; Nicholas, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Watkinson, A.: ¬The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals (2006) 0.01
    0.00977442 = product of:
      0.04398489 = sum of:
        0.01725646 = weight(_text_:of in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01725646 = score(doc=990,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
        0.026728429 = product of:
          0.053456858 = sum of:
            0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053456858 = score(doc=990,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The article employs deep log analysis (DLA) techniques, a more sophisticated form of transaction log analysis, to demonstrate what usage data can disclose about information seeking behaviour of virtual scholars - academics, and researchers. DLA works with the raw server log data, not the processed, pre-defined and selective data provided by journal publishers. It can generate types of analysis that are not generally available via proprietary web logging software because the software filters out relevant data and makes unhelpful assumptions about the meaning of the data. DLA also enables usage data to be associated with search/navigational and/or user demographic data, hence the name 'deep'. In this connection the usage of two digital journal libraries, those of EmeraldInsight, and Blackwell Synergy are investigated. The information seeking behaviour of nearly three million users is analyzed in respect to the extent to which they penetrate the site, the number of visits made, as well as the type of items and content they view. The users are broken down by occupation, place of work, type of subscriber ("Big Deal", non-subscriber, etc.), geographical location, type of university (old and new), referrer link used, and number of items viewed in a session.
  7. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools, techniques and concepts for the Internet age (2000) 0.01
    0.009544941 = product of:
      0.042952232 = sum of:
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=1745,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
        0.032258797 = product of:
          0.064517595 = sum of:
            0.064517595 = weight(_text_:problems in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064517595 = score(doc=1745,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.47391602 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This work tackles one of the fundamental problems of information management - how to get the right information to the right person at the right time. It provides a practical framework to enable information services to gather information from users in order to aid information system design, and to monitor the effectiveness of an information service. This new edition has been fully revised and now has increased coverage of the Internet. The Web raises many problems when it comes to meeting information needs - authority and overload, for example - and these problems make an effective information needs analysis even more crucial. There is a new methodology section on Web log analysis and focus group interviews. Practical advice is given concerning interview technique and an interview schedule is included.
  8. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Watkinson, A.: Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour : a pilot study (2003) 0.01
    0.009463206 = product of:
      0.042584427 = sum of:
        0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024941156 = score(doc=688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
        0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01764327 = score(doc=688,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates, through deep log analysis, the impact of "Big Deal" agreements on the online searching behaviour of users of the Emerald digital library Web site, which provides access to more than 150 journals in the fields of business and information science. The purpose of the evaluation was to map the online information seeking behaviour of the digital library user and to see whether those signed-up to a Big Deal arrangement behaved any differently from the others. In general they did. The real surprise proved to be the strong consumer traits of the library's users. Research reported here refers to the first stage of a three-stage research project.
  9. Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Martin, H.; Cole, P.: ¬The media and the Internet : Final report of the British Library-funded research project: The Changing Information Environment: The Impact of the Internet on Information Seeking Behaviour in the Media (1998) 0.01
    0.008399268 = product of:
      0.037796706 = sum of:
        0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 4597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194373 = score(doc=4597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4597)
        0.012602335 = weight(_text_:of in 4597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012602335 = score(doc=4597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4597)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  10. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.01
    0.008132559 = product of:
      0.036596518 = sum of:
        0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02181897 = score(doc=2017,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.014777548 = weight(_text_:of in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014777548 = score(doc=2017,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.
  11. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals : case study OhioLINK (2006) 0.01
    0.007547885 = product of:
      0.033965483 = sum of:
        0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0125971865 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
        0.021368299 = weight(_text_:of in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021368299 = score(doc=5605,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.41429368 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project funded by the US Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original "big deal", provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journal for more than 600,000 people in the state of Ohio. The purpose of the paper is not only to present findings from the deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, but, arguably more importantly, to try test a new method of analysing online information user behaviour - deep log analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The raw server logs were obtained for the period June 2004 to December 2004. For this exploratory study one month (October) of the on-campus usage logs and seven months of the off-campus transaction logs were analysed. Findings - During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. The paper presents a number of usage analyses including: number of journals used, titles of journals used, use over time, a returnee analysis and a special analysis of subject, date and method of access. Practical implications - The research findings help libraries evaluate the efficiency of big deal and one-stop shopping for scholarly journals and also investigate their users' information seeking behaviours. Originality/value - The research is a part of efforts to test the applications of a new methodology, deep log analysis, for use and user studies. It also represents the most substantial independent analysis of, possibly, the most important and significant of the journal big deals ever conducted.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.4, S.482-508
  12. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996) 0.01
    0.006945559 = product of:
      0.031255014 = sum of:
        0.008911197 = weight(_text_:of in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008911197 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
        0.022343816 = product of:
          0.044687632 = sum of:
            0.044687632 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044687632 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 19:22:51
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Assignation. 14(1997) no.2, S.24 (S. Vogel); Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.1, S.68 (J. Secker)
  13. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.: Website usage metrics : a re-assessment of session data (2008) 0.01
    0.006038308 = product of:
      0.027172387 = sum of:
        0.010077749 = weight(_text_:library in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010077749 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
        0.017094638 = weight(_text_:of in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017094638 = score(doc=2040,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33143494 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Metrics derived from user visits or sessions provide a means of evaluating Websites and an important insight into online information seeking behaviour, the most important of them being the duration of sessions and the number of pages viewed in a session, a possible busyness indicator. However, the identification of session (termed often 'sessionization') is fraught with difficulty in that there is no way of determining from a transactional log file that a user has ended their session. No one logs out. Instead a session delimiter has to be applied and this is typically done on the basis of a standard period of inactivity. To date researchers have discussed the issue of a time out delimiter in terms of a single value and if a page view time exceeds the cut-off value the session is deemed to have ended. This approach assumes that page view time is a single distribution and that the cut-off value is one point on that distribution. The authors however argue that page time distribution is composed of a number of quite separate view time distributions because of the marked differences in view times between pages (abstract, contents page, full text). This implies that a number of timeout delimiters should be applied. Employing data from a study of the OhioLINK digital journal library, the authors demonstrate how the setting of a time out delimiter impacts on the estimate of page view time and the number of estimated session. Furthermore, they also show how a number of timeout delimiters might apply and they argue that this gives a better and more robust estimate of the number of sessions, session time and page view time compared to an application of a single timeout delimiter.
  14. Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Cole, P.; Martin, H.: ¬The impact of the Internet on information seeking in the Media (2000) 0.01
    0.005874325 = product of:
      0.026434463 = sum of:
        0.010913943 = weight(_text_:of in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010913943 = score(doc=722,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
        0.0155205205 = product of:
          0.031041041 = sum of:
            0.031041041 = weight(_text_:problems in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031041041 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    There is very little qualitative data on what impact the Internet is having on information seeking in the workplace. Using open-ended interviews, questionnaires and observation, the impact of the Internet on the British Media was assessed. The focus was largely on newspapers, with The Guardian being covered in some depth. Over 300 journalists and media librarians were surveyed. It was found that amongst traditional journalists use was light. Poor access to the Internet - and good access to other information resources - were largely the reasons for this. Of the journalists it was mainly the older and more senior journalists and the New Media journalists who used the Internet. Librarians were also significant users. Searching the World Wide Web was the principal Internet activity and use was generally conservative in character. Newspapers and official sites were favoured, and searches were mainly of a fact-checking nature. Email was used on a very limited scale and was not regarded as a serious journalistic tool. Non-users were partly put off by the Internet's potential for overloading them with information and its reputation for producing information of suspect quality. Users generally dismissed these concerns, dealing with potential overload and quality problems largely by using authoritative sites and exploiting the lower quality data where it was needed. Where the Internet has been used it has not been at the expense of other information sources or communication channels, but online hosts seem to be at most risk in the future.
  15. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Huntington, P.: What do faculty and students really think about e-books? (2007) 0.01
    0.0054190205 = product of:
      0.024385592 = sum of:
        0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0125971865 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
        0.0117884055 = weight(_text_:of in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0117884055 = score(doc=824,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to report on a large-scale survey that was carried out to assess academic users' awareness, perceptions and existing levels of use of e-books. The survey also seeks to find out about the purposes to which electronic books were put, and to obtain an understanding of the most effective library marketing and communication channels. Design/methodology/approach - An e-mail invitation to participate in the survey was distributed to all UCL staff and students (approximately 27,000) in November 2006, and 1,818 completions were received, an effective response rate of at least 6.7 per cent. Statistical analyses were carried out on the data using Software Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings - The survey findings point to various ways in which user uptake and acceptance of e-books may be encouraged. Book discovery behaviour, a key issue for publishers and librarians in both print and electronic environments, emerges as a critical focus for service delivery and enhancement. Originality/value - The survey is part of an action research project, CIBER's SuperBook, that will further investigate the issues raised in this initial benchmarking survey using deep log analysis and qualitative methods. The paper partly fills the gap in the literature on e-books which has mainly focused on usage and not the users.
  16. Williams, P.; Nicholas, D.; Gunter, B.: E-learning: what the literature tells us about distance education : an overview (2005) 0.00
    0.00485492 = product of:
      0.02184714 = sum of:
        0.009430724 = weight(_text_:of in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009430724 = score(doc=662,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.18284513 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.012416417 = product of:
          0.024832834 = sum of:
            0.024832834 = weight(_text_:problems in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832834 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.18241036 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The CIBER group at University College London are currently evaluating a distance education initiative funded by the Department of Health, providing in-service training to NHS staff via DiTV and satellite to PC systems. This paper aims to provide the context for the project by outlining a short history of distance education, describing the media used in providing remote education, and to review research literature on achievement, attitude, barriers to learning and learner characteristics. Design/methodology/approach - Literature review, with particular, although not exclusive, emphasis on health. Findings - The literature shows little difference in achievement between distance and traditional learners, although using a variety of media, both to deliver pedagogic material and to facilitate communication, does seem to enhance learning. Similarly, attitudinal studies appear to show that the greater number of channels offered, the more positive students are about their experiences. With regard to barriers to completing courses, the main problems appear to be family or work obligations. Research limitations/implications - The research work this review seeks to consider is examining "on-demand" showing of filmed lectures via a DiTV system. The literature on DiTV applications research, however, is dominated by studies of simultaneous viewing by on-site and remote students, rather than "on-demand". Practical implications - Current research being carried out by the authors should enhance the findings accrued by the literature, by exploring the impact of "on-demand" video material, delivered by DiTV - something no previous research appears to have examined. Originality/value - Discusses different electronic systems and their exploitation for distance education, and cross-references these with several aspects evaluated in the literature: achievement, attitude, barriers to take-up or success, to provide a holistic picture hitherto missing from the literature.
  17. Jamali, H.R.; Nicholas, D.: Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers (2008) 0.00
    0.0023763191 = product of:
      0.021386873 = sum of:
        0.021386873 = weight(_text_:of in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021386873 = score(doc=2566,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The study aims to examines two aspects of information seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers including methods applied for keeping up-to-date and methods used for finding articles. The relationship between academic status and research field of users with their information seeking behaviour was investigated. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using a questionnaire survey of PhD students and staff of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at University College London; 114 people (47.1 per cent response rate) participated in the survey. Findings - The study reveals differences among subfields of physics and astronomy in terms of information-seeking behaviour, highlights the need for and the value of looking at narrower subject communities within disciplines for a deeper understanding of the information behaviour of scientists. Originality/value - The study is the first to deeply investigate intradisciplinary dissimilarities of information-seeking behaviour of scientists in a discipline. It is also an up-to-date account of information seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers.
  18. Jamali, H.R.; Nicholas, D.: Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists (2010) 0.00
    0.0023008613 = product of:
      0.02070775 = sum of:
        0.02070775 = weight(_text_:of in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02070775 = score(doc=4231,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Adopting an intradisciplinary perspective, this article evaluates the information-seeking behavior of academics from different subfields of physics and astronomy. It investigates the effect of interdisciplinarity (reliance on the literature of other subjects) and the scatter of literature on two aspects of the information-seeking behavior: methods used for keeping up-to-date and for identifying articles. To this end a survey of 114 PhD students and staff at the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University College London was carried out. The findings showed that the subfields that are more interdisciplinary or have a more scattered literature are more likely to use general search facilities for finding information. The study also showed that cross-disciplinary use of the literature is not necessarily an indicator of scattered literature. The study reveals intradisciplinary differences among physicists and astronomers in terms of their information-seeking behavior and highlights the risk of overlooking the characteristics of information-seeking behavior of specialized subject communities by focusing on very broad subject categories.
  19. Nicholas, D.; Martin, H.: Assessing information needs : a case study of journalists (1997) 0.00
    0.002240415 = product of:
      0.020163735 = sum of:
        0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020163735 = score(doc=450,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines a structure for analysing information needs. The purpose of the structure is to enable data on users to be collected in a systematic and routine manner. The form of analysis is demonstrated through a consideration of the information needs of newspaper journalists. Aspects of information need considered are: subject, nature, function, viewpoint, authority, quantity, quality, place of origin, speed of delivery, and processing/packaging. Considers the barriers to meeting information needs and training, time, resources, access and information overload. Also assesses the library's role in meeting information needs
  20. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.: ¬The impact of location on the use of information systems : case study - health information kiosks (2002) 0.00
    0.002141985 = product of:
      0.019277865 = sum of:
        0.019277865 = weight(_text_:of in 3736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019277865 = score(doc=3736,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3736, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3736)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Touch-screen kiosks are situated in a variety of locations to provide the public with ready access to health information. This paper examines their use, via the transactional logs, and makes comparisons between the types of organisation in which the kiosks are housed. Twenty-one kiosks were selected and categorised into four groups - pharmacy, hospital, information centre and surgery. A small case study features a supermarket kiosk. Details of nearly 90,000 user sessions and 750,000 page views were used for the comparison. Comparisons between sites were made in terms of number of users, their age and gender, trends over time, the number of sessions conducted, page view time, session duration, pages viewed, site penetration, number of pages printed and health topics viewed. There were considerable differences between the kiosk locations. This early research provides the quantitative foundation for a fuller study of kiosk location and the differences in perceptions of the quality/authority of kiosk data.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.3, S.284-301