Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.02
    0.017911714 = product of:
      0.053735137 = sum of:
        0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026182763 = score(doc=5583,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.014146087 = weight(_text_:of in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014146087 = score(doc=5583,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
    Source
    Library trends. 59(2011) no.4, S.637-649
  2. Breeding, M.: Library systems report 2019 : cycles of innovation (2019) 0.01
    0.013715201 = product of:
      0.061718404 = sum of:
        0.049370687 = weight(_text_:library in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049370687 = score(doc=5988,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.56927717 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
        0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012347717 = score(doc=5988,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The library technology industry, broadly speaking, shows more affinity toward utility than innovation. Library automation systems are not necessarily exciting technologies, but they are workhorse applications that must support the complex tasks of acquiring, describing, and providing access to materials and services. They represent substantial investments, and their effectiveness is tested daily in the library. But more than efficiency is at stake: These products must be aligned with the priorities of the library relative to collection management, service provision, and other functions.
    Source
    https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2019/05/01/library-systems-report-2019/
  3. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.00
    0.0029791754 = product of:
      0.026812578 = sum of:
        0.026812578 = product of:
          0.053625155 = sum of:
            0.053625155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053625155 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  4. Kim, T.C.-w.K.; Zumstein, P.: Semiautomatische Katalogisierung und Normdatenverknüpfung mit Zotero im Index Theologicus (2016) 0.00
    0.0022395 = product of:
      0.020155499 = sum of:
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.29, 2016 [urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100238157]
  5. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.: ¬The science of managing our digital stuff (2016) 0.00
    0.0013719685 = product of:
      0.012347717 = sum of:
        0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 3971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012347717 = score(doc=3971,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3971, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3971)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how design of new PIM systems can help us manage our information more efficiently. Each of us has an ever-growing collection of personal digital data: documents, photographs, PowerPoint presentations, videos, music, emails and texts sent and received. To access any of this, we have to find it. The ease (or difficulty) of finding something depends on how we organize our digital stuff. In this book, personal information management (PIM) experts Ofer Bergman and Steve Whittaker explain why we organize our personal digital data the way we do and how the design of new PIM systems can help us manage our collections more efficiently.
    Content
    Bergman and Whittaker report that many of us use hierarchical folders for our personal digital organizing. Critics of this method point out that information is hidden from sight in folders that are often within other folders so that we have to remember the exact location of information to access it. Because of this, information scientists suggest other methods: search, more flexible than navigating folders; tags, which allow multiple categorizations; and group information management. Yet Bergman and Whittaker have found in their pioneering PIM research that these other methods that work best for public information management don't work as well for personal information management. Bergman and Whittaker describe personal information collection as curation: we preserve and organize this data to ensure our future access to it. Unlike other information management fields, in PIM the same user organizes and retrieves the information. After explaining the cognitive and psychological reasons that so many prefer folders, Bergman and Whittaker propose the user-subjective approach to PIM, which does not replace folder hierarchies but exploits these unique characteristics of PIM.
  6. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.00
    0.0011202075 = product of:
      0.010081868 = sum of:
        0.010081868 = weight(_text_:of in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010081868 = score(doc=4884,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Raw data set (in CSV format) of a user survey about usage and needs regarding reference management software (like Endnote, Zotero, Citavi) in germany 2011. Participants were mainly college students, librarians, and other users of reference management software.

Languages

Types

Classifications