-
Lex, W.: ¬A representation of concepts for their computerization (1987)
0.01
0.013694874 = product of:
0.061626934 = sum of:
0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861448 = score(doc=618,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
0.042765487 = product of:
0.085530974 = sum of:
0.085530974 = weight(_text_:etc in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085530974 = score(doc=618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A lattice theoretical description of concept hierarchies is developed using for attributes the terms "given", "negated", "open" and "impossible" as the truth-values of a four-valued logic. Similar to the theory of B. Ganter and R. Wille so does this framework permit a precise representation of the usual interdependences in a field of related concepts - such as superconcepts, subconcept, contrary concepts etc. -, whenever the concepts under consideration can be sufficiently described by the presence or absence of certain attributes ...
-
Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999)
0.01
0.012396963 = product of:
0.037190888 = sum of:
0.010077749 = weight(_text_:library in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010077749 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.014696722 = weight(_text_:of in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014696722 = score(doc=2470,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28494355 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.012416417 = product of:
0.024832834 = sum of:
0.024832834 = weight(_text_:problems in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024832834 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.18241036 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Even for the experienced information professional, designing an efficient multi-purpose information access structure can be a very difficult task. This paper argues for the use of a faceted thesaurus as the basis for organizing a small-scale institutional website. We contend that a faceted approach to knowledge organization can make the process of organization less random and more manageable. We begin by reporting on an informal survey of three institutional websites. This study underscores the problems of organization that can impact access to information. We then formalize the terminology of faceted thesauri and demonstrate its application with several examples.
The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.006871153 = product of:
0.030920189 = sum of:
0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015279518 = score(doc=5095,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.01564067 = product of:
0.03128134 = sum of:
0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03128134 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995)
0.01
0.0067161713 = product of:
0.03022277 = sum of:
0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012347717 = score(doc=1901,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.017875053 = product of:
0.035750106 = sum of:
0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035750106 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.006575311 = product of:
0.0295889 = sum of:
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=2654,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.01564067 = product of:
0.03128134 = sum of:
0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03128134 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Wille, R.: Geometric representations of concept lattices (1989)
0.00
0.002240415 = product of:
0.020163735 = sum of:
0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020163735 = score(doc=3042,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Conceptual and numerical analysis of data. Ed.: O. Opitz
-
Neuss, C.; Kent, R.E.: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information (1995)
0.00
0.0020957165 = product of:
0.018861448 = sum of:
0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861448 = score(doc=2204,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- With the continuously growing amount of Internet accessible information resources, locating relevant information in the WWW becomes increasingly difficult. Recent developments provide scalable mechanisms for maintaing indexes of network accessible information. In order to implement sophisticated retrieval engines, a means of automatic analysis and classification of document meta information has to be found. Proposes the use of methods from the mathematical theory of concept analysis to analyze and interactively explore the information space defined by wide area resource discovery services
-
Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991)
0.00
0.0020792792 = product of:
0.018713512 = sum of:
0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018713512 = score(doc=3033,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
- Source
- Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm
-
Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993)
0.00
0.0020579526 = product of:
0.018521573 = sum of:
0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018521573 = score(doc=5262,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a
-
Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996)
0.00
0.0020579526 = product of:
0.018521573 = sum of:
0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018521573 = score(doc=5895,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
-
Eklund, P.; Groh, B.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.: ¬A conceptual-logic extension of TOSCANA (2000)
0.00
0.0017822391 = product of:
0.016040152 = sum of:
0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016040152 = score(doc=5082,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to indicate how TOSCANA may be extended to allow graphical representations not only of concept lattices but also of concept graphs in the sense of Contextual Logic. The contextual- logic extension of TOSCANA requires the logical scaling of conceptual and relational scales for which we propose the Peircean Algebraic Logic as reconstructed by R. W. Burch. As graphical representations we recommend, besides labelled line diagrams of concept lattices and Sowa's diagrams of conceptual graphs, particular information maps for utilizing background knowledge as much as possible. Our considerations are illustrated by a small information system about the domestic flights in Austria
-
Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994)
0.00
0.0017712038 = product of:
0.015940834 = sum of:
0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015940834 = score(doc=7733,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Formal concept lattices are a promising vehicle for the construction of rigorous and empirically accurate semantic nets. Presented here are results of initial experiments with concept lattices as representations of semantic relationships in the implicit structure of a large database (e.g. Roget's thesaurus)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Reinartz, T.P.; Zickwolff, M.: ¬Two conceptual approaches to acquire human expert knowledge in a complex real world domain (1996)
0.00
0.0017149607 = product of:
0.015434646 = sum of:
0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015434646 = score(doc=5908,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
-
Kumar, C.A.; Radvansky, M.; Annapurna, J.: Analysis of Vector Space Model, Latent Semantic Indexing and Formal Concept Analysis for information retrieval (2012)
0.00
0.0016977243 = product of:
0.015279518 = sum of:
0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015279518 = score(doc=2710,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), a variant of classical Vector Space Model (VSM), is an Information Retrieval (IR) model that attempts to capture the latent semantic relationship between the data items. Mathematical lattices, under the framework of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), represent conceptual hierarchies in data and retrieve the information. However both LSI and FCA uses the data represented in form of matrices. The objective of this paper is to systematically analyze VSM, LSI and FCA for the task of IR using the standard and real life datasets.
-
Wille, R.: Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems (1984)
0.00
0.0015842128 = product of:
0.014257914 = sum of:
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006)
0.00
0.0015842128 = product of:
0.014257914 = sum of:
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=4305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
-
Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993)
0.00
0.0015842128 = product of:
0.014257914 = sum of:
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=620,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
-
Kollewe, W.: Data representation by nested line diagrams illustrated by a survey of pensioners (1991)
0.00
0.0015498033 = product of:
0.01394823 = sum of:
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=5230,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- With formal concept analysis surveys are analyzable in the way that a meaningful picture of the answers of the interviewed persons is available. Line diagrams of large concept lattices might become less readable up to the point that it is impossible to pursue the line segments with the eyes. Nested line diagrams give the opportunity to overcome these difficulties. The main idea of nested line diagrams is to partition the line diagram into boxes so that line segments between two boxes are all parallel and may be replaced by one line segment. The possibility to draw line diagrams with more than two factors does allow it to describe concept lattices with many hundred or thousand concepts in a clear structure. In practice it has often been proven useful to take standardized scales for the single levels
-
Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000)
0.00
0.0015498033 = product of:
0.01394823 = sum of:
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=6055,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
-
Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998)
0.00
0.0015498033 = product of:
0.01394823 = sum of:
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=6658,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
