Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Müller, C.; Sternitzke, N.; Stratmann, R.; Parschik, T.: Kataloganreicherung und Zeitschriftenerschließung mit MyBib eDoc und C-3 am Ibero-Amerikanischen Institut, Preußischer Kulturbesitz : Neue Verfahren zur Optimierung der bibliografischen Nachweissituation in einer großen Spezialbibliothek (2010) 0.03 
    0.03490171 = product of:
  0.078528844 = sum of:
    0.010077749 = weight(_text_:library in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010077749 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
    0.005040934 = weight(_text_:of in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005040934 = score(doc=3499,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.09773483 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
    0.03317039 = weight(_text_:congress in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03317039 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.21081993 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
    0.030239766 = product of:
      0.060479533 = sum of:
        0.060479533 = weight(_text_:etc in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060479533 = score(doc=3499,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33853072 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    Abstract
    Die Bibliothek des lbero-Amerikanischen Instituts der Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz in Berlin (IAI) ist mit über 830.000 Monografien, 33.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen, von denen ca. 5.000 als laufende Abos geführt werden, und zahlreichen weiteren großen Sondersammlungen (Landkarten, Tonträger, Videos, DVDs, Nachlässe etc.) die größte Spezialbibliothek zu Lateinamerika, Spanien, Portugal und der Karibik in Europa und nach der Library of Congress in Washington und der Nettie-Lee-Benson-Collection der University of Texas in Austin die drittgrößte Spezialbibliothek dieser Art in der Welt. Über Kauf, Tausch und Schenkung erweitert sich der Bestand jedes Jahr um ca. 30.000 Monografien. Um die Nachweissituation von Sammelband- und Zeitschriftenaufsätzen und gleichzeitig das bibliografische Informationsangebot im Sinne einer Spezialbibliothek zu verbessern, hat das IAl in den letzten zwei Jahren zwei neue Geschäftsgänge eingeführt, mit denen die seit der Gründung des IAI vor fast 80 Jahren gängige Praxis, ausgewählte Aufsätze aus Zeitschriften und Sammelbänden zu erschließen, automatisiert wurde. Als erstes trat die Bibliothek des IAI 2007 dem System der Online-Contents-Sondersammelgebietsausschnitte (OLC-SSG) des GBV bei und betreut seitdem den OLC-SSG Ibero-Amerika. Es werden dazu im IAI sowohl die aktuellen als auch die bis zum Jahr 2000 zurückreichenden Inhaltsverzeichnisse von 780 laufenden Zeitschriftentiteln auf Artikelebene erschlossen.
    Zur Bewältigung dieser Menge an Artikeldaten kommt im IAI die Software C-3 der ImageWare Components GmbH zum Einsatz, die es ermöglicht, die formale Erschließung in einem größtenteils automatisierten Geschäftsgang durchzuführen. In den einzelnen Modulen von C-3 erfolgt die automatische Erkennung der Titel-, Autoren- und Seitenzahlinformationen in den gescannten Inhaltsverzeichnissen sowie deren automatische Indexierung und Konversion in Katalogisate. An den Indexierungsarbeitsplätzen kommen normale Standard-PCs zum Einsatz, über die auf die Auftragsverwaltung des zentralen C-3 Periodikaservers per Browser zugegriffen wird. Die C-3 Software besteht aus den Programmmodulen C-3 Template und C-3 Index. In C-3 Template werden einmalig für jeden Zeitschriftentitel die Struktur der Inhaltsverzeichnisse (Interpretationstyp Regel, Tabelle oder Freiform), die Abfolge von Aufsatztitel, Autoren und Seitenzahlen sowie die Schriftattribute (fett, kursiv etc.) der bibliografischen Daten festgelegt. Auf Basis dieser Templatedefinition werden die Scans der jeweiligen Inhaltsverzeichnisse im C-3 Index Modul mit der OCR Software Abbyy Fine Reader so erkannt, dass die bibliografischen Informationen der einzelnen Aufsätze bereits kategorisiert und aufsatzweise separiert ausgegeben werden. Die dabei erzeugten Daten können, sofern erforderlich, noch während der Bearbeitung mit C-3 mit einer Reihe von integrierten Nachbearbeitungstools korrigiert und im Anschluss im XML-Format an den C-3 Periodikaserver exportiert werden. Automatische Konversionsroutinen erzeugen aus den xml-Dateien serverseitig Artikeldaten im Pica3-Format, die nach einer abschließenden Qualitätskontrolle in die Online Contents Datenbanken des GBV eingespielt werden.
  2. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.02 
    0.020816881 = product of:
  0.06245064 = sum of:
    0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020155499 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
    0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017462308 = score(doc=8116,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  3. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.02 
    0.01937021 = product of:
  0.058110625 = sum of:
    0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026182763 = score(doc=1187,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018521573 = score(doc=1187,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.013406289 = product of:
      0.026812578 = sum of:
        0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026812578 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  4. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.02 
    0.01759586 = product of:
  0.052787576 = sum of:
    0.025715325 = product of:
      0.05143065 = sum of:
        0.05143065 = weight(_text_:headings in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05143065 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015116624 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
    0.011955625 = weight(_text_:of in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011955625 = score(doc=3926,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
  5. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.02 
    0.01690785 = product of:
  0.05072355 = sum of:
    0.02666322 = weight(_text_:library in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02666322 = score(doc=520,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3074448 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.015122802 = weight(_text_:of in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015122802 = score(doc=520,freq=36.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
            36.0 = termFreq=36.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.0089375265 = product of:
      0.017875053 = sum of:
        0.017875053 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017875053 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
  6. Hauer, M.: Collaborative catalog enrichment : 4. Benutzertreffen intelligentCAPTURE / dandelon.com (2007) 0.01 
    0.013653681 = product of:
  0.040961042 = sum of:
    0.00881803 = weight(_text_:library in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00881803 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.10167781 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.0031189187 = weight(_text_:of in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031189187 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.060470343 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.02902409 = weight(_text_:congress in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02902409 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.18446743 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    Content
    "AGI - Information Management Consultants (www.agi-imc.de) hatte am 8. und 9. Mai 2007 zum vierten Mal Bibliotheken und Partner zum Erfahrungsaustausch nach Neustadt an der Weinstraße eingeladen. Die angereisten Teilnehmer betreiben bereits mittels intelligentCAPTURE die Produktion und über dandelon.com den Austausch und die Publikation (www.dandelon.com). Mittlerweile wird intelligentCAPTURE in Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein, Italien und in der Schweiz eingesetzt. Die PDF-Dateien gelangen über einen Partner bis zur weltgrößten Bibliothek, der Library of Congress in Washington. In Deutschland ist der GBV - Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverband in Göttingen (www.gbv.de) Partner von AGI und der größte Sekundärnutzer von dandelon.com. In dandelon.com sind derzeit über 220.000 Bücher suchbar, die Datenbank wächst täglich. Weitere 62.000 Titel werden nach einem Software-Update demnächst geladen; sie stammen aus Projekten mit der Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg und der TIB Hannover. Vergleichbare Scanprojekte laufen derzeit in einer Spezialbibliothek in Hamburg, der UB Braunschweig und UB Mainz. AGI geht von 400 bis 500.000 Buchtiteln bis Ende 2007 aus. Erstmals sahen die Teilnehmer "intelligentCAPTURE mobile". Eine Lösung, welche die Scanner selbst zwischen die engsten Regale fährt und somit erheblich den Transportaufwand reduziert - der Scanner wird zum Buch transportiert, nicht Tonnen von Büchern zu Scannern. Gemeinsam mit dem führenden Anbieter von Bibliothekseinrichtungen Schulz Speyer (www.schulzspeyer.de) wurde intelligentCAPTURE mobil gemacht.
  7. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.01 
    0.012640138 = product of:
  0.056880623 = sum of:
    0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03527212 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
    0.021608504 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021608504 = score(doc=844,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Imprint
    Syracuse, NY : Syracuse Univ., School of Information Studies
  8. Bellei, M.: ¬Un catalogo 'ricco' (1998) 0.01 
    0.012359609 = product of:
  0.055618238 = sum of:
    0.04848928 = product of:
      0.09697856 = sum of:
        0.09697856 = weight(_text_:headings in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09697856 = score(doc=4647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.606243 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007128957 = weight(_text_:of in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007128957 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    To enhance descriptions, cataloguers can add 'enriching' words or phrases to titles, or introduce content-enriched access features to aid subject-based research. Additional and natural language subject headings designed to support, though not replace, controlled language headings can result in enhanced indexing. Analytical cataloguing and double indexing are 2 other means by which readers can gian access to additional bibliographic data. Also examines how online research tool effectiveness can be enhanced by a system of automatic links between descriptors
  9. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.01 
    0.0123458365 = product of:
  0.055556264 = sum of:
    0.035630222 = weight(_text_:library in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035630222 = score(doc=1700,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.4108404 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
    0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019926041 = score(doc=1700,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Reports a project to enhance the records of the reference book collection, held on the online catalogue of the Minnesota University, Bio-Medical Library, with tables of contents or summaries; and to keyword index the enhancement fields to improve searching
    Source
    Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 83(1995) no.2, S.244-246
  10. Mandel, C.A.; Herschman, J.: Online subject access : enhancing the library catalog (1983) 0.01 
    0.012126425 = product of:
  0.054568913 = sum of:
    0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040310998 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
    0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014257914 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 9(1983), S.148-155
  11. Van Orden, R.: Content-enriched access to electronic information : summaries of selected research (1991) 0.01 
    0.012126425 = product of:
  0.054568913 = sum of:
    0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040310998 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
    0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014257914 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 9(1991), no.31, S.27-32
  12. Dillon, M.; Wenzel, P.: Retrieval effectiveness of enhanced bibliographic records (1990) 0.01 
    0.012126425 = product of:
  0.054568913 = sum of:
    0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040310998 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
    0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014257914 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 8(1990) no.3, issue 31,1, S.43-46
  13. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.01 
    0.010501793 = product of:
  0.047258068 = sum of:
    0.03491035 = weight(_text_:library in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03491035 = score(doc=1067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012347717 = score(doc=1067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.5-15
  14. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.01 
    0.010475789 = product of:
  0.047141053 = sum of:
    0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030233247 = score(doc=376,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.016907806 = weight(_text_:of in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016907806 = score(doc=376,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 30(1986), S.402-412
  15. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.01 
    0.010455628 = product of:
  0.047050323 = sum of:
    0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030546555 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
    0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016503768 = score(doc=4650,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 37(1993) no.2, S.167-180
  16. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.01 
    0.010026759 = product of:
  0.045120414 = sum of:
    0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194373 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
    0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019926041 = score(doc=6983,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  17. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.01 
    0.00988773 = product of:
  0.044494785 = sum of:
    0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030546555 = score(doc=516,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
    0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01394823 = score(doc=516,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
  18. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.009723781 = product of:
  0.043757014 = sum of:
    0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012475675 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.03128134 = product of:
      0.06256268 = sum of:
        0.06256268 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06256268 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  19. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01 
    0.009723781 = product of:
  0.043757014 = sum of:
    0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012475675 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
    0.03128134 = product of:
      0.06256268 = sum of:
        0.06256268 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06256268 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  20. Wu, S.: Implementing bibliographic enhancement data in academic library catalogs : an empirical study (2024) 0.01 
    0.009224435 = product of:
  0.04150996 = sum of:
    0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03527212 = score(doc=1159,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
    0.0062378375 = weight(_text_:of in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062378375 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    This study examines users' needs for bibliographic enhancement data (BIBED) in academic library catalogs. Qualitative data were collected through 30 academic users' activity logs and follow-up interviews. These 30 participants were recruited from a public university in the United States that has over 19,000 students enrolled and over 600 full-time faculty members. This study identified 19 types of BIBED useful for supporting the five user tasks proposed in the IFLA Library Reference Model and in seven other contexts, such as enhancing one's understanding, offering search instructions, and providing readers' advisory. Findings suggest that adopting BIBFRAME and Semantic Web technologies may enable academic library catalogs to provide BIBED to better meet user needs in various contexts.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 8
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 51
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes