-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.08
0.07622502 = product of:
0.13720503 = sum of:
0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181897 = score(doc=138,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.016671322 = weight(_text_:of in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016671322 = score(doc=138,freq=28.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.041462988 = weight(_text_:congress in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041462988 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.046079848 = product of:
0.092159696 = sum of:
0.092159696 = weight(_text_:exercises in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092159696 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2345736 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.39288178 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011171908 = product of:
0.022343816 = sum of:
0.022343816 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022343816 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.1, S.59-68
-
Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003)
0.07
0.072833404 = product of:
0.13110012 = sum of:
0.025715325 = product of:
0.05143065 = sum of:
0.05143065 = weight(_text_:headings in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05143065 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026182763 = score(doc=2556,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016040152 = score(doc=2556,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049755584 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.013406289 = product of:
0.026812578 = sum of:
0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026812578 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
- Date
- 30.12.2008 18:22:46
-
Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014)
0.07
0.06782055 = product of:
0.15259624 = sum of:
0.051963624 = product of:
0.10392725 = sum of:
0.10392725 = weight(_text_:headings in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10392725 = score(doc=1963,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941156 = score(doc=1963,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01764327 = score(doc=1963,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05804818 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
-
Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001)
0.06
0.061285842 = product of:
0.13789314 = sum of:
0.04242812 = product of:
0.08485624 = sum of:
0.08485624 = weight(_text_:headings in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08485624 = score(doc=6109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941156 = score(doc=6109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012475675 = score(doc=6109,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05804818 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.05
0.05311774 = product of:
0.11951492 = sum of:
0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030546555 = score(doc=2837,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015279518 = score(doc=2837,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05804818 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.01564067 = product of:
0.03128134 = sum of:
0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03128134 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010)
0.05
0.05246095 = product of:
0.118037134 = sum of:
0.02424464 = product of:
0.04848928 = sum of:
0.04848928 = weight(_text_:headings in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04848928 = score(doc=3965,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3031215 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.022534532 = weight(_text_:library in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022534532 = score(doc=3965,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25983828 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.013805167 = weight(_text_:of in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013805167 = score(doc=3965,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.0574528 = weight(_text_:congress in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0574528 = score(doc=3965,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36515084 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
The paper discusses the importance of these initiatives in releasing as linked data the very large quantities of rich, professionally-generated metadata stored in formats based on these standards, such as UNIMARC and MARC21, addressing such issues as critical mass for semantic and statistical inferencing, integration with user- and machine-generated metadata, and authenticity, veracity and trust. The paper also discusses related initiatives to release controlled vocabularies, including the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), ISBD, Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), Rameau (French subject headings), Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), and the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) as linked data. Finally, the paper discusses the potential collective impact of these initiatives on metadata workflows and management systems.
- Content
- Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.05
0.051898163 = product of:
0.15569448 = sum of:
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=2686,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.12128108 = sum of:
0.085530974 = weight(_text_:etc in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085530974 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035750106 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Dillon, M.: Metadata for Web resources : how metadata works on the Web (2000)
0.05
0.04681262 = product of:
0.14043786 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 6798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=6798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 6798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6798)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 6798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=6798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6798)
0.09951117 = weight(_text_:congress in 6798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951117 = score(doc=6798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.63245976 = fieldWeight in 6798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6798)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Footnote
- Paper for the conference 'Bibliographic control for the new millennium' held in Washington, DC at the Library of Congress, November 2000
-
McCallum, S.M.: Extending MARC for bibliographic control in the Web environment : Challenges and alternatives (2000)
0.05
0.04681262 = product of:
0.14043786 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 6803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=6803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 6803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6803)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 6803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=6803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6803)
0.09951117 = weight(_text_:congress in 6803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951117 = score(doc=6803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.63245976 = fieldWeight in 6803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6803)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Footnote
- Paper for the conference 'Bibliographic control for the new millennium' held in Washington, DC at the Library of Congress, November 2000
-
Caplan, P.: International metadata initiatives : lessons in bibliographic control (2000)
0.05
0.04681262 = product of:
0.14043786 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 6804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=6804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 6804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6804)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 6804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=6804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6804)
0.09951117 = weight(_text_:congress in 6804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951117 = score(doc=6804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.63245976 = fieldWeight in 6804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6804)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Footnote
- Paper for the conference 'Bibliographic control for the new millennium' held in Washington, DC at the Library of Congress, November 2000
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.04
0.044702295 = product of:
0.10058016 = sum of:
0.021378135 = weight(_text_:library in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021378135 = score(doc=4747,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016040152 = score(doc=4747,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049755584 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.013406289 = product of:
0.026812578 = sum of:
0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026812578 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the MARCXML architecture implemented at the Library of Congress. It gives an overview of the component pieces of the architecture, including the MARCXML schema and the MARCXML toolkit, while giving a brief tutorial on their use. Several different applications of the architecture and tools are discussed to illustrate the features of the toolkit being developed thus far. Nearly any metadata format can take advantage of the features of the toolkit, and the process of the toolkit enabling a new format is discussed. Finally, this paper intends to foster new ideas with regards to the transformation of descriptive metadata, especially using XML tools. In this paper the following conventions will be used: MARC21 will refer to MARC 21 records in the ISO 2709 record structure used today; MARCXML will refer to MARC 21 records in an XML structure.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011)
0.04
0.04450463 = product of:
0.100135416 = sum of:
0.04454025 = product of:
0.0890805 = sum of:
0.0890805 = weight(_text_:headings in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0890805 = score(doc=2595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.55686975 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=2595,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.011955625 = weight(_text_:of in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011955625 = score(doc=2595,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.013406289 = product of:
0.026812578 = sum of:
0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026812578 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Academic libraries have moved toward providing social networking features, such as tagging, in their library catalogs. To explore whether user tags can enhance access to individual literary works, the author obtained a sample of individual works of English and American literature from the twentieth and twenty-first centuries from a large academic library catalog and searched them in LibraryThing. The author compared match rates, the availability of subject headings and tags across various literary forms, and the terminology used in tags versus controlled-vocabulary headings on a subset of records. In addition, she evaluated the usefulness of available LibraryThing tags for the library catalog records that lacked subject headings. Options for utilizing the subject terms available in sources outside the local catalog also are discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.4, S.221-233
-
Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004)
0.04
0.038288996 = product of:
0.06892019 = sum of:
0.008571775 = product of:
0.01714355 = sum of:
0.01714355 = weight(_text_:headings in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01714355 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.107169636 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008727588 = weight(_text_:library in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008727588 = score(doc=2874,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.10063494 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.004715362 = weight(_text_:of in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004715362 = score(doc=2874,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.091422565 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.016585195 = weight(_text_:congress in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016585195 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.105409965 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.03032027 = sum of:
0.021382743 = weight(_text_:etc in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021382743 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.11968868 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.0089375265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089375265 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
- Content
- Cataloguing Section (Sektion Katalogisierung) Der Schwerpunkt der Arbeit dieser Sektion liegt auf der Erarbeitung bzw. internationalen Harmonisierung von Strukturen, Regeln und Arbeitsverfahren mit dem Ziel, die internationale Kooperation im Katalogisierungsbereich zu verbessern. In Anbetracht des laufenden Evaluierungsprozesses wurde der Strategieplan der Sektion zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nur dort aktualisiert, wo es unbedingt erforderlich war. Neue Ziele wurden nicht aufgenommen. Oberste Priorität bei den strategischen Zielen behielt die Entwicklung internationaler Katalogisierungsstandards für die bibliographische Beschreibung und den Zugriff. In ihrer zentralen Bedeutung bestätigt wurden auch die "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records" (FRBR). Darüber hinaus gehört auch in Zukunft die Weiterentwicklung und Revision der ISBDs zu den zentralen Anliegen der Arbeit der Sektion Katalogisierung. Ein weiteres vorrangiges Ziel bleibt die Erarbeitung von Standards, Regeln und Informationslisten, um den Zugang zu bibliographischen Daten in allen Sprachen zu ermöglichen. Hierzu zählen u. a.: - die vollständige Veröffentlichung der Anonymous Classics: Der Teil für europäische Literatur ist inzwischen veröffentlicht'. Für die Erarbeitung weiterer Teile (Lateinamerika, Afrika und Asien) soll das Verfahren gestrafft und ein Zeitplan erstellt werden. - die Beobachtung der Aktivitäten zu Unicode und die Information der Sektionsmitglieder darüber zur Förderung des mehrsprachigen Zugangs zu bibliographischer Information - die Entwicklung eines web-basierten multilingualen Wörterbuchs für Katalogisierungsbegriffe - die Entwicklung und der Test von (Daten-)Modellen für eine virtuelle internationale Normdatei - die Überarbeitung der "IFLA Names of persons". Das Open Programme der Sektion stand in diesem Jahr unter dem Motto "Developments in Cataloguing Guidelines" und wurde von Barbara Tillett, Lynne Howarth und Carol van Nuys bestritten. Lynne Howarth ging in ihrem Vortrag "Enabling metadata: creating a core record for resource discovery" auf die Reaktionen im weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahren auf die Veröffentlichung des Papiers "Guidance an the Structure, Content and Application of Metadata Records for digital resources and collections" der Working Group an the Use of Metadata Schemes ein. Carol van Nuys stellte das norwegische "Paradigma Project and its quest for metadata solutions and services" vor.
Aus den Arbeitsgruppen der Cataloguing Sektion: Schwerpunkt der Arbeiten der ISBD Review Group bleibt die Fortsetzung des generellen Revisionsprojekts. 2004 konnte die revidierte ISBD(G) veröffentlicht werden Für die Revision der ISBD(A) wurde eine Study Group aus Experten für das Alte Buch gebildet. Das weltweite Stellungnahmeverfahren ist für Frühjahr 2005 geplant. Bezüglich der Revision der ISBD(ER) konnten im weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahren aufgekommene Fragen während der Sitzungen in Buenos Aires abschließend geklärt werden. Die Veröffentlichung der neuen ISBD(ER) ist für Ende 2004 / Anfang 2005 geplant. Die Revision der ISBD(CM) ist im Rahmen einer gemeinsamen Arbeitsgruppe der ISBD Review Group und der Sektion Geographie und Karten weiter vorangekommen. Für die Revision der ISBD(NBM) soll eine eigene Study Group gebildet werden. Die FRBR Review Group konnte erste Fortschritte bei der Erreichung der im vergangenen Jahr gesetzten Ziele Erarbeitung einer Richtlinie zur Anwendung der FRBR bei der Katalogisierung, Erweiterung der FRBR-Web-Seite im IFLAnet, um bei anderen communities (Archive, Museen etc.) für das Modell zu werben, sowie Überarbeitung des FRBR-Modells vermeIden. Von den in Berlin gebildeten fünf FRBR-Arbeitsgruppen (Expression entity Working Group, Working Group an continuing resources, Working Group an teaching and training, Working Group an subject relationships and classification, Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue) sind einige bereits aktiv gewesen, vor allem die letztgenannte Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue. Die "Working Group an subject relationships and classification" soll demnächst in Zusammenarbeit mit der Classification and Indexing Section etabliert werden. Ziel hierbei ist es, die FRBR auch auf den Bereich der Inhaltserschließung auszuweiten. Die "Working Group an continuing resources" hat in Buenos Aires beschlossen, ihre Arbeit nicht fortzuführen, da die FRBR in ihrer derzeitigen Fassung "seriality" nicht ausreichend berücksichtigen. Es ist geplant, eine neue Arbeitsgruppe unter Einbeziehung ausgewiesener Experten für fortlaufende Werke zu bilden, die sich mit diesem Problem beschäftigen soll. Für das IFLA Multilingual Dictionary of Cataloguing Terms and Concepts - MulDiCat' konnten die Richtlinien für die Eingabe in die Datenbank fertig gestellt und erforderliche Änderungen in der Datenbank implementiert werden. Die Datenbank dieses IFLA-Projekts enthält mittlerweile alle englischsprachigen Definitionen des AACR2-Glossars, die deutschen Übersetzungen der AACR2-Glossar-Definitionen sowie alle ISBD-Definitionen. Im nächsten Schritt sollen Einträge für die FRBR-Terminologie ergänzt werden. Ebenso sollen Ergänzungen zu den englischen Einträgen vorgenommen werden (aus AACR, ISBD, FRBR und weiteren IFLA-Publikationen). Die Guidelines for OPAC Displays (Richtlinien zur Präsentation von Suchergebnissen im OPAC) stehen nach der Durchführung des weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahrens zur Veröffentlichung im IFLAnet bereit. Die Working Group an OPAC Displays hat damit ihre Arbeit beendet.
Classification and Indexing Section (Sektion Klassifikation und Indexierung) Die Working Group an Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri hat ihre Arbeit abgeschlossen, die Richtlinien werden Ende 2004 im IFLAnet zur Verfügung stehen. Die 2003 ins Leben gerufene Arbeitsgruppe zu Mindeststandards der Inhaltserschließung in Nationalbibliographien hat sich in Absprache mit den Mitgliedern des Standing Committee auf den Namen "Guidelines for minimal requirements for subject access by national bibliographic agencies" verständigt. Als Grundlage der zukünftigen Arbeit soll der "Survey an Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies" von Magda HeinerFreiling dienen. Davon ausgehend soll eruiert werden, welche Arten von Medienwerken mit welchen Instrumentarien und in welcher Tiefe erschlossen werden. Eine weitere Arbeitsgruppe der Sektion befasst sich mit dem sachlichen Zugriff auf Netzpublikationen (Working Group an Subject Access to Web Resources). Die Veranstaltung "Implementation and adaption of global tools for subject access to local needs" fand regen Zuspruch. Drei Vortragende zeigten auf, wie in ihrem Sprachgebiet die Subject Headings der Library of Congress (LoC) übernommen werden (Development of a Spanish subject heading list und Subject indexing in Sweden) bzw. wie sich die Zusammenarbeit mit der LoC gestalten lässt, um den besonderen terminologischen Bedürfnissen eines Sprach- und Kulturraums außerhalb der USA Rechnung zu tragen (The SACO Program in Latin America). Aus deutscher Sicht verdiente der Vortrag "Subject indexing between international standards and local context - the Italian case" besondere Beachtung. Die Entwicklung eines Regelwerks zur verbalen Sacherschließung und die Erarbeitung einer italienischen Schlagwortnormdatei folgen nämlich erklärtermaßen der deutschen Vorgehensweise mit RSWK und SWD.
Projekt "Mapping ISBDs to FRBR" Die Deutsche Bibliothek und die British Library haben im Rahmen ihrer jeweiligen Zuständigkeiten innerhalb von ICABS gemeinsam das Projekt "Mapping ISBDs to FRBR" finanziert. Beide Bibliotheken unterstützen damit die strategischen Ziele der IFLA-CDNL Allianz für bibliographische Standards. Die Deutsche Bibliothek ist innerhalb der Allianz verantwortlich für die Unterstützung der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung der ISBD, während die British Library für die Unterstützung von Pflege und Entwicklung der FRBR zuständig ist. Für die Durchführung des Projekts konnte Tom Delsey gewonnen werden, der federführender Autor der FRBR ist und Beiträge zu vielen verschiedenen Aspekten der ISBDs geliefert hat. Das Ergebnis seiner Arbeit "Mapping ISBD Elements to FRBR Entity Attributes and Relationships" steht im IFLAnet zur VerFügung (http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/pubs/ISBD-FRBR-mappingFinal.pdf).
-
Hengel, C.: Normdaten und Metadaten : die Idee eines internationalen authority file (2003)
0.04
0.03788631 = product of:
0.0852442 = sum of:
0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125971865 = score(doc=1763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
0.0044555985 = weight(_text_:of in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044555985 = score(doc=1763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.086386204 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
0.041462988 = weight(_text_:congress in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041462988 = score(doc=1763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
0.026728429 = product of:
0.053456858 = sum of:
0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053456858 = score(doc=1763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Normdaten sind Metadaten besonderer Oualität: Metadaten zu Metadaten. In einem getrennt vom Metadaten-Set zur einzelnen Publikation gebildeten Normdaten-Satz werden die unterschiedlichen in den Publikationen verwendeten Namensformen bzw. Bezeichnungen für dasselbe Objekt zusammengeführt und normiert. Durch die Verwendung von Normdaten als Metadaten wird kontrolliert und sichergestellt, dass z. B. für Autoren, Urheber, Verleger, Sachinhalte etc. gleich bleibende, identische Sucheinstiege und Zugriffspunkte gebildet werden (Authority Control). Für die Recherche wirkt sich die Normierung so aus, dass die zugehörigen Publikationen über alle im Normdatensatz beinhalteten Namensformen und Bezeichnungen gefunden werden können. Durch die Angabe von Attributen und Relationen zu den einzelnen Objekten werden zudem zusätzliche, vernetzte Zugriffspunkte bereitgestellt. Normdaten sind damit ideal zur Bildung von semantischen Navigationsnetzen für die Suche und den Zugriff auf Publikationen und andere Objekte geeignet. Das standardisierte Vokabular und das Nummernsystem einer Normdatei hat aber nur im eigenen Anwendungsbereich Gültigkeit, und die gemeinsame Nutzung von Titeldaten kann durch die Nutzung unterschiedlicher Normdateien behindert werden. Die IFLA-Arbeitsgruppe FRANAR hat mit der Vision eines gemeinsamen Virtuellen Authority File ein Modell entwickelt, wie im Bibliothekswesen Interoperabilität zwischen den nationalen Normdateien hergestellt werden kann. Um die Realisierbarkeit eines solchen Vorhabens nachzuweisen, haben die Library of Congress, OCLC und Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein gemeinsames Projekt vereinbart, in dem exemplarisch für den Bereich der Personennormdaten ein VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) aufgebaut werden soll.
-
Arms, C.R.: Available and useful : OAI at the Library of Congress (2003)
0.04
0.035747074 = product of:
0.10724122 = sum of:
0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026182763 = score(doc=4773,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=4773,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.07036502 = weight(_text_:congress in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07036502 = score(doc=4773,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress (LC) was an early adopter of the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. The protocol allows LC to make digitized historical collections available for integration into other services. The protocol was straightforward to implement and the harvesting traffic has no perceptible effect on the primary users of the American Memory project. Now that services can integrate records for cultural heritage resources from many sources, it is time to build on that experience to develop better services. How should the scarce resources available to produce metadata be deployed to most advantage to support discovery in different contexts? How might metadata harvesting be exploited to support new interfaces and enhanced navigation among related resources in digital libraries? This article starts a conversation between metadata providers and service builders by describing LC's experience and questions that have surfaced.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 21(2003) no.2, S.129-139
-
McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003)
0.04
0.035667256 = product of:
0.10700177 = sum of:
0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181897 = score(doc=1760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.013366793 = weight(_text_:of in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013366793 = score(doc=1760,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.071816005 = weight(_text_:congress in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071816005 = score(doc=1760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
-
Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014)
0.03
0.033293445 = product of:
0.09988033 = sum of:
0.037028015 = weight(_text_:library in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037028015 = score(doc=1589,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.01309673 = weight(_text_:of in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01309673 = score(doc=1589,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049755584 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
-
Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998)
0.03
0.03255271 = product of:
0.0732436 = sum of:
0.01714355 = product of:
0.0342871 = sum of:
0.0342871 = weight(_text_:headings in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0342871 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.21433927 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010077749 = weight(_text_:library in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010077749 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.012851911 = weight(_text_:of in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012851911 = score(doc=1256,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2491759 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.03317039 = weight(_text_:congress in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03317039 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.21081993 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This article describes an approach for linking geographically distributed collections of metadata so that they are searchable as a single collection. We describe the infrastructure, which uses standard Internet protocols such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP), to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index information. We discuss the advantages of using linked collections of authoritative metadata as an alternative to using a keyword indexing search-engine for resource discovery. We examine other architectures that use metadata for resource discovery, such as Dienst/NCSTRL, the AHDS HTTP/Z39.50 Gateway, and the ROADS initiative. Finally, we discuss research issues and future directions of the project. The Internet Scout Project, which is funded by the National Science Foundation and is located in the Computer Sciences Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is charged with assisting the higher education community in resource discovery on the Internet. To that end, the Scout Report and subsequent subject-specific Scout Reports were developed to guide the U.S. higher education community to research-quality resources. The Scout Report Signpost utilizes the content from the Scout Reports as the basis of a metadata collection. Signpost consists of more than 2000 cataloged Internet sites using established standards such as Library of Congress subject headings and abbreviated call letters, and emerging standards such as the Dublin Core (DC). This searchable and browseable collection is free and freely accessible, as are all of the Internet Scout Project's services.
As well developed as both the Scout Reports and Signpost are, they cannot capture the wealth of high-quality content that is available on the Internet. An obvious next step toward increasing the usefulness of our own collection and its value to our customer base is to partner with other high-quality content providers who have developed similar collections and to develop a single, virtual collection. Project Isaac (working title) is the Internet Scout Project's latest resource discovery effort. Project Isaac involves the development of a research testbed that allows experimentation with protocols and algorithms for creating, maintaining, indexing and searching distributed collections of metadata. Project Isaac's infrastructure uses standard Internet protocols, such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index or centroid information. The overall goal is to support a single-search interface to geographically distributed and independently maintained metadata collections.
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.03
0.03104665 = product of:
0.06985496 = sum of:
0.021429438 = product of:
0.042858876 = sum of:
0.042858876 = weight(_text_:headings in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042858876 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181897 = score(doc=124,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015434646 = score(doc=124,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.011171908 = product of:
0.022343816 = sum of:
0.022343816 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022343816 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Location
- Cornell University Library
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.3, S.190-203
-
Baca, M.; O'Keefe, E.: Sharing standards and expertise in the early 21st century : Moving toward a collaborative, "cross-community" model for metadata creation (2008)
0.03
0.029347178 = product of:
0.08804153 = sum of:
0.021378135 = weight(_text_:library in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021378135 = score(doc=2321,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.016907806 = weight(_text_:of in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016907806 = score(doc=2321,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049755584 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a brief overview of the evolving descriptive metadata landscape, one phenomenon of which can be characterized as "cross-community" metadata as manifested in records that are the result of a combination of carefully considered data value and data content standards. he online catalog of the Morgan Library & Museum provides a real-life illustration of how diverse data content standards and vocabulary tools can be integrated within the classic data structure/technical interchange format of MARC21 to better describe unique, museum-type objects, and to provide better end-user access and understanding. The Morgan experience also shows the value of developing a collaborative model for metadata creation that combines the subject expertise of curators and scholars with the cataloging expertise and knowledge of standards possessed by librarians.
- Content
- Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
