Search (170 results, page 1 of 9)

0.032420114 = product of:
  0.07294525 = sum of:
    0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020155499 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
    0.010081868 = weight(_text_:of in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010081868 = score(doc=7231,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017875053 = product of:
      0.035750106 = sum of:
        0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035750106 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.44444445 = coord(4/9)

Abstract

Considers the new Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia published by the ALA in 1994. Examines the current and future status of the Guidelines and discusses the problems involved in applying them to the media coming into the library at La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.17-20

0.026974142 = product of:
  0.080922425 = sum of:
    0.012797733 = weight(_text_:of in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012797733 = score(doc=150,freq=66.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2481255 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
          8.124039 = tf(freq=66.0), with freq of:
            66.0 = termFreq=66.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
    0.010974666 = product of:
      0.021949332 = sum of:
        0.021949332 = weight(_text_:problems in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021949332 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.1612295 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05715002 = sum of:
      0.03779971 = weight(_text_:etc in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03779971 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03298316 = queryNorm
          0.2115817 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.019350313 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019350313 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03298316 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Classification

006.7 22

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."

0.023599774 = product of:
  0.07079932 = sum of:
    0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02850418 = score(doc=5472,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
    0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017462308 = score(doc=5472,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Describes the design and development of a multimedia guide to learning services. Gives details of the package which encompasses library and computing facilities, subject resources, floorplans and site personnel. Discusses the problems associated with introducing large numbers of students to learning services and explores the advantages of the multimedia approach. Outlines the multipurpose nature of the package and describes plans for future evaluation and developments

Source

The new review of academic librarianship. 1995, no.1, S.85-94

0.023511257 = product of:
  0.07053377 = sum of:
    0.040310998 = weight(_text_:library in 6385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040310998 = score(doc=6385,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 6385, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6385)
    0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 6385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012347717 = score(doc=6385,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 6385, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6385)
    0.017875053 = product of:
      0.035750106 = sum of:
        0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 6385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035750106 = score(doc=6385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6385)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

The use of multimedia technology can facilitate access to archives and special collections and, once they are digitized, they are preserved and can be reproduced easily. Describes how the library of Lund University in Sweden has provided access to some of its special collections using a VTLS Infostation, a hypermedia information access and authoring system for library automation, by creating some prototypes og inhouse multimedia products

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.3, S.194-197

0.020816881 = product of:
  0.06245064 = sum of:
    0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020155499 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
    0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017462308 = score(doc=4684,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Describes the establishment of the Task force on description of interactive media, under the auspices of the American Library Association's Committee on Cataloguing, Description and Access, which led ultimately to the development of the guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia. Notes the problems in identifying interactive multimedia and the level of detail often needed to describe them

0.019028533 = product of:
  0.057085596 = sum of:
    0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024941156 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016503768 = score(doc=758,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.01564067 = product of:
      0.03128134 = sum of:
        0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03128134 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Imprint

Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science

Source

Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore

0.018268244 = product of:
  0.05480473 = sum of:
    0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 3986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194373 = score(doc=3986,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 3986, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3986)
    0.014089839 = weight(_text_:of in 3986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014089839 = score(doc=3986,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 3986, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3986)
    0.0155205205 = product of:
      0.031041041 = sum of:
        0.031041041 = weight(_text_:problems in 3986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031041041 = score(doc=3986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 3986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Reviews the current state of the art in the field of electronic publishing of periodical articles in full text, with particular reference to the experiences of Elsevier Science. Distinguishes between 4 types of full text electronic publishing: bibliographic data, for example CAPCAS, with SGML type electronic bibliographic records for articles in Elsevier journals; electronic access to an existing periodical on a single title basis, similar to the way in which Elsevier provides access to articles in the well established printed periodical Nuclear Physics; enhancement of an existing periodical through expanded hypertext links, in the same way that Immunology Today Online is provided with value added features impossible to emulate in a printed periodical; and the TULIP model, an Elsevier initiative which enables large scale full text document delivery of electronic periodicals via unedited ASCII full text created by OCR and cover to cover 300 dpi bitmapped page images. Pays tribute to other initiatives in the field, including: document delivery services such as UnCover and the British Library's Inside Information; Digital Libraries Initiative; Informedia Digital Video Library Project; Stanford Integrated Digital Library Project; California University at Berkeley Digital Library Project and Alexandria Digital Library Project. Discusses the future of the information and publishing industries in the light of these developments, noting the implications and problems likely to be encountered and the opportunities for new, multimedia publications

0.014517452 = product of:
  0.043552354 = sum of:
    0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0125971865 = score(doc=2801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
    0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015434646 = score(doc=2801,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
    0.0155205205 = product of:
      0.031041041 = sum of:
        0.031041041 = weight(_text_:problems in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031041041 = score(doc=2801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

The book covers multimedia ontology in heritage preservation with intellectual explorations of various themes of Indian cultural heritage. The result of more than 15 years of collective research, Multimedia Ontology: Representation and Applications provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the nature of media data and the principles involved in its interpretation. The book presents a unified approach to recent advances in multimedia and explains how a multimedia ontology can fill the semantic gap between concepts and the media world. It relays real-life examples of implementations in different domains to illustrate how this gap can be filled. The book contains information that helps with building semantic, content-based search and retrieval engines and also with developing vertical application-specific search applications. It guides you in designing multimedia tools that aid in logical and conceptual organization of large amounts of multimedia data. As a practical demonstration, it showcases multimedia applications in cultural heritage preservation efforts and the creation of virtual museums. The book describes the limitations of existing ontology techniques in semantic multimedia data processing, as well as some open problems in the representations and applications of multimedia ontology. As an antidote, it introduces new ontology representation and reasoning schemes that overcome these limitations. The long, compiled efforts reflected in Multimedia Ontology: Representation and Applications are a signpost for new achievements and developments in efficiency and accessibility in the field.

Footnote

Rez. in: Annals of Library and Information Studies 62(2015) no.4, S.299-300 (A.K. Das)

0.01318518 = product of:
  0.05933331 = sum of:
    0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015434646 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
    0.043898664 = product of:
      0.08779733 = sum of:
        0.08779733 = weight(_text_:problems in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08779733 = score(doc=3599,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.644918 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Discusses the problems and opportunities promised by multimedia CD-ROM data bases from the viewpoint of libraries and information centres. Considers the problems of planning for multimedia and coping with the host of standards that exist.

0.0123935165 = product of:
  0.055770822 = sum of:
    0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 1768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018521573 = score(doc=1768,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1768, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1768)
    0.03724925 = product of:
      0.0744985 = sum of:
        0.0744985 = weight(_text_:problems in 1768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0744985 = score(doc=1768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.5472311 = fieldWeight in 1768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1768)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Examines ways of approaching the problems of effective integration of multimedia elements such as graphics, audio and video into a Internet WWW site, so as to increase substantially its utility and aesthetic appeal

0.0121373 = product of:
  0.054617852 = sum of:
    0.023576811 = weight(_text_:of in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023576811 = score(doc=2808,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.45711282 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.031041041 = product of:
      0.062082082 = sum of:
        0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062082082 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Attempts to illuminate some of the problems that arise as new multimedia technology is absorbed into the widening scope of publishing. Discusses some of the methods of dissemination and reviews some of the technologies that support the dissemination of information

0.011877713 = product of:
  0.053449705 = sum of:
    0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04275627 = score(doc=2975,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
    0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 2975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0106934365 = score(doc=2975,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2975, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2975)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Footnote

Rez. in: Library journal 119(1994) no.17, S.91 ( P. Kelly)

Imprint

Chicago, IL : American Library Association

0.011326019 = product of:
  0.050967082 = sum of:
    0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019926041 = score(doc=4681,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
    0.031041041 = product of:
      0.062082082 = sum of:
        0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062082082 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Describes examples of interactive multimedia and some of the problems faced in cataloguing, particularly in the choice of a general material designation to summarize the essential nature of the work. Discusses the guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia

0.010972632 = product of:
  0.049376845 = sum of:
    0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 8370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014257914 = score(doc=8370,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 8370, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8370)
    0.03511893 = product of:
      0.07023786 = sum of:
        0.07023786 = weight(_text_:problems in 8370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07023786 = score(doc=8370,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.5159344 = fieldWeight in 8370, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8370)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Analyzes the fundamental role that the new optical multimedia information technologies play in museums as a solution to problems in the management of museum documentation and assesses the advantages that this new technology can give to museums. Notes the new optical means of information storage and the problems hindering the hypermedia interactive development in these institutions: legal, technological, standardization and resources. Describes a range of multimedia projects in the art information community

0.010946681 = product of:
  0.049260065 = sum of:
    0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030546555 = score(doc=2428,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
    0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018713512 = score(doc=2428,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Final report of a British Library supported conducted at University College, London, computer science department, the aim of which was to build a demonstration and test bed facility for online access to a large electronic library of multimedia documents. The project was a pilot experiment in the use of a database of compound documents (text and images) in the Open Document Architecture format. The database used is part of the contents of information in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Discusses the overall view of the project with particular reference to the WAIS information retrieval server which was developed and used

Imprint

London : British Library Research and Development Department

0.010327931 = product of:
  0.046475686 = sum of:
    0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015434646 = score(doc=4757,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
    0.031041041 = product of:
      0.062082082 = sum of:
        0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062082082 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Explains how Internet video and audio broadcasting is overcoming the technical obstacles of narrow bandwidth of telephone lines, the limits of compressing multimedia data, and problems that packet switching transmission cause for audio transmissions. Decribes some current applications and future possibilities

0.010197283 = product of:
  0.045887772 = sum of:
    0.024159042 = weight(_text_:of in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024159042 = score(doc=1796,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.46840128 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
    0.02172873 = product of:
      0.04345746 = sum of:
        0.04345746 = weight(_text_:problems in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345746 = score(doc=1796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

There are parallels between the early stages of development of interactive multimedia programs and the 'Primitive Mode of Representation' in early film. Findings from fieldwork analyzing children's use of 4 interactive multimedia programs are compared with a description of some features of early film and are used as the basis of a consideration of some of the problems faced by an audience encountering a nascent medium. Some of the methods which were adopted to facilitate the audience's understanding of films - the use of intertitles and a narrator - are considered, and discusses thesuitability for adaptation to interface design for multimedia programs

Source

Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 3(1994) nos.3/4, S.275-293

0.009934297 = product of:
  0.044704337 = sum of:
    0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026182763 = score(doc=1094,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
    0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018521573 = score(doc=1094,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Reports results of the project C-ODAI, undertaken at University College London, Computer Science Department, the aim of which was to build a demonstration and test bed facility for online access to a large electronic library of multimedia documents. The project was a pilot experiment in the use of a database of compound documents (text and images) in the Open Document Architecture (ODA) format. The database used is part of the contents of the periodicals of the American Chemical Society (ACS). Discusses the overall view of the project and the tools which have been implemented to deal with juke box storage and conversion of different data, and early results of user tests. The project forms part of the ACS/PODA project, funded jointly by the CEC under the ESPRIT PODA-SAX project, and by the British Library Research and Development Department

Imprint

London : British Library Research and Development Department

0.00970984 = product of:
  0.04369428 = sum of:
    0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018861448 = score(doc=947,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Multimedia databases started to appear on the market in 1989. They are computer databases combining a number of features, including text, images, sound and video, and may appear in CD-ROM, CD-I, floppy disk, or videodisc format. Examples of multimedia products are games, instructional programs, and refrence materials. A study of such media in the Netherlands revealed the limitations of search facilities and the difficulty of reading large amounts of text on screen. Multimedia publishers will need to overcome these problems in order to stand any chance of success

0.009257751 = product of:
  0.041659877 = sum of:
    0.014777548 = weight(_text_:of in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014777548 = score(doc=5732,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
    0.02688233 = product of:
      0.05376466 = sum of:
        0.05376466 = weight(_text_:problems in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05376466 = score(doc=5732,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39493 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Recent technological developments have increased the use of machine learning to solve many problems, including many in information retrieval. Multimedia information retrieval as a problem represents a significant challenge to machine learning as a technological solution, but some problems can still be addressed by using appropriate AI techniques. We review the technological developments and provide a perspective on the use of machine learning in conjunction with knowledge organization to address multimedia IR needs. The semantic gap in multimedia IR remains a significant problem in the field, and solutions to them are many years off. However, new technological developments allow the use of knowledge organization and machine learning in multimedia search systems and services. Specifically, we argue that, the improvement of detection of some classes of lowlevel features in images music and video can be used in conjunction with knowledge organization to tag or label multimedia content for better retrieval performance. We provide an overview of the use of knowledge organization schemes in machine learning and make recommendations to information professionals on the use of this technology with knowledge organization techniques to solve multimedia IR problems. We introduce a five-step process model that extracts features from multimedia objects (Step 1) from both knowledge organization (Step 1a) and machine learning (Step 1b), merging them together (Step 2) to create an index of those multimedia objects (Step 3). We also overview further steps in creating an application to utilize the multimedia objects (Step 4) and maintaining and updating the database of features on those objects (Step 5).