Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

0.022763472 = product of:
  0.06829041 = sum of:
    0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015116624 = score(doc=1464,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.013891181 = weight(_text_:of in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013891181 = score(doc=1464,freq=54.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.26932552 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
            54.0 = termFreq=54.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.039282613 = product of:
      0.078565225 = sum of:
        0.078565225 = weight(_text_:etc in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078565225 = score(doc=1464,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.43976432 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

For the first time, under the leadership of the Visual Resources Association, a cross section of five visual and cultural heritage experts, along with scores of reviewers from varied institutions, have created a new data content standard focused on cultural materials. This cutting-edge reference offers practical resources for cataloging and flexibility to meet the needs of a wide range of institutions - from libraries to museums to archives to visual collections. Consistently following these guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate metadata elements in cultural materials' catalog records: promotes good descriptive cataloging and reduces redundancy; builds a foundation of shared documentation; creates data sharing opportunities; and, complements existing standards

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S. 264-265 (L.C. Howarth): "At a time when cataloguing code revision is continuing apace with the consolidation of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), the drafting of RDA: Resource Description and Access, and the development of common principles for an international cataloguing code (International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code [IME ICC]), the publication of a guide for cataloguing cultural objects is timely and purposeful. Compiling this data content standard on behalf of the Visual Resources Association, the five editors - with oversight from an advisory board - have divided the guide into three parts. Following a brief introduction outlining the purpose, intended audience, and scope and methodology for the publication, Part One, General Guidelines, explains both what the Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) guide is "a broad document that includes rules for formatting data, suggestions for required information, controlled vocabulary requirements, and display issues" (p. I) and is not "not a metadata element set per se" (p. 1). Part Two, Elements, is further divided into nine chapters dealing with one or more metadata elements, and describing the relationships between and among each element. Part Three, Authorities, discusses what elements to include in building authority records. A Selected Bibliography, Glossary, and Index, respectively, round out the guide.
As the editors note in their introduction, "Standards that guide data structure, data values, and data content form the basis for a set of tools that can lead to good descriptive cataloging, consistent documentation, shared records, and increased end-user access" (p. xi). The VRA Core Categories, for example, represent a set of metadata elements expressed within an XML structure (data structure). Likewise, the Art Architecture Thesaurus contains sets of terms and relationships, or defined data values. While much effort has been expended on developing both data structures and values, the editors argue, the third leg of the stool, data content, has received less attention. Unlike the library community with its Anglo-American Cataloging Rules [sic though RDA is referenced in the Selected Bibliography], or its archival equivalent, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), those in the domain of cultural heritage responsible for describing and documenting works of art, architecture, cultural artifacts, and their respective images, have not had the benefit of such data content standards. CCO is intended to address (or redress) that gap, emphasizing the exercise of good judgment and cataloguer discretion over the application of "rigid rules" [p. xii], and building on existing standards. ... Overall, Cataloging Cultural Objects with its attending guidelines for descriptive metadata and authority control for "one-of-a-kind cultural objects" should merit a place among the "well-established" data content standards of the library and archival communities that CCO references with obvious regard."

Imprint

Chicago, IL : American Library Association

LCSH

Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.

Subject

Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.

0.017596586 = product of:
  0.052789755 = sum of:
    0.010081868 = weight(_text_:of in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010081868 = score(doc=2237,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    0.024832834 = product of:
      0.049665667 = sum of:
        0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665667 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017875053 = product of:
      0.035750106 = sum of:
        0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035750106 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(3/9)

Abstract

Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: Thematic access to databanks on contemporary works of art

0.010349835 = product of:
  0.046574257 = sum of:
    0.016334493 = weight(_text_:of in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016334493 = score(doc=2671,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.31669703 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
    0.030239766 = product of:
      0.060479533 = sum of:
        0.060479533 = weight(_text_:etc in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060479533 = score(doc=2671,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33853072 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.009701037 = product of:
  0.043654665 = sum of:
    0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024941156 = score(doc=5188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
    0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018713512 = score(doc=5188,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Ellender Memorial Library at Nicholls State University, Louisiana has a slide collection including 10,000 slides in 60 sets devoted to art. Describes how the cataloguer solved the problem of entering sufficiently detailed records of this part of the collection on the OPAC of a small college library, using the OCLC authority file for artists' names and NUTPLUS which offers access via any combination of 15 data elements including e.g., aspects of the subject, call and item numbers and location of the works of art. NUTPLUS is now available in a new version, called Ultra-Plus Advanced, from Fairhaven Software of Stoughton, Massachusetts

0.008691376 = product of:
  0.039111193 = sum of:
    0.021378135 = weight(_text_:library in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021378135 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
    0.017733058 = weight(_text_:of in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017733058 = score(doc=3759,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

The entry provides an overview of the data content standard, Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), developed by the Visual Resources Association (VRA), and published in 2006 by the American Library Association (ALA). CCO fills a gap in the array of descriptive standards by providing guidelines for visual resources curators, museum documentation specialists, archivists, librarians, or anyone engaged in the documentation of works of art and architecture, objects of material culture, and their images. The entry begins by placing CCO within the context of object and visual image cataloging and the broader framework of data content standards. Following the organization of the guide, which is divided into three parts, General Guidelines, Elements, and Authorities, it summarizes the main features of CCO. Finally, it evaluates CCO in terms of its suitability for use by the metadata communities that form its intended audience, and its sustainability.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.008153656 = product of:
  0.03669145 = sum of:
    0.009963021 = weight(_text_:of in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009963021 = score(doc=4289,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
    0.026728429 = product of:
      0.053456858 = sum of:
        0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053456858 = score(doc=4289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

This article begins by presenting and discussing the distinction between record-oriented and pattern-oriented search. Examples or recordoriented (or item-oriented) questions include: "What (or how many, etc.) glass items made prior to 100 A.D. do we have in our collection?" and "How many paintings featuring dogs do we have that were painted during the 19th century, and who painted them?" Standard database systems are well suited to answering such questions, based on the data in, for example, a collections management system. Examples of pattern-oriented questions include: "How does the (apparent) productoin of glass objects vary over time between 400 B.C. and 100 A.D.?" and "What other animals are present in paintings with dogs (painted during the 19th century and in our collection)?" Standard database systems are not well suited to answering these sorts of questions, even though the basic data is properly stored in them. To answer pattern-oriented questions it is the accepted solution to transform the underlying (relational) data to what is called the data cube or cross tabulation form. We discuss how this can be done for non-numeric data, such as are found in museum collections and archives

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.14-23

0.0073145726 = product of:
  0.032915577 = sum of:
    0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01763606 = score(doc=5000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
    0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015279518 = score(doc=5000,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.007018732 = product of:
  0.031584293 = sum of:
    0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01763606 = score(doc=3720,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
    0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01394823 = score(doc=3720,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

The National Gallery of Canada Library and Archives functions as Canada's national art and supports research on a national and international basis. Given this important mandate and the research interest in art exhibitions, it was important to catalogue the exhibition-related material and to publicize National Gallery holdings. Describes the project of creating an online finding aid for exhibition records and other material related to more than 1900 exhibitions held between 1880 and the present at the National Gallery of Canada. Sets out the goals and many benefits of the project

0.0057355687 = product of:
  0.02581006 = sum of:
    0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015116624 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
    0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0106934365 = score(doc=5290,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Hypermedia offers a new paradigm for the design of information systems, yet there are few working applications. The best situation is for a database to hold information and a hypermedia package to provide the interface. Explains why museum information systems are ideal for investigating the augmentation of traditional databases with hypermedia. 2 leading examples in the UK are the Micro Gallery at the National Gallery and the Design Museum public catalogue. Describes a prototype development of an interface for the visiting public to allow access to the museum database. Object records from Leicestershire Museums local collection and the George III collection of early scientific instruments from the Science Museum, London, were used. Object records were stored on an IBM PC in dBase databases. The hypermedia front-end was built using Hypercard on a Macintosh LC computer. Covers system design and evaluation

Source

Library and information research news. 15(1992) no.55, S.3-8

0.005543827 = product of:
  0.024947222 = sum of:
    0.0035644786 = weight(_text_:of in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0035644786 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.06910896 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
    0.021382743 = product of:
      0.042765487 = sum of:
        0.042765487 = weight(_text_:etc in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042765487 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

SHIC liefert eine breite interdisziplinäre Struktur für die Einteilung von Objekten, Photographien, Archivmaterial Tonbandaufnahmen. lnformationsdateien und aller weiterer Formen musealen Materials auf dem Gebiet der menschlichen Geschichte. Sie kann abstrakte Begriffe sowie Materialien von sehr allgemeiner Natur zusätzlich zu genauer definierten Stücken bewältigen. Die Klassifikation hat eine hierarchische Struktur mit Stufen, die vom Allgemeinen bis zum Spezifischen gehen. In der Regel sind die höheren Stufen begrifflich, während die niedrigeren Stufen direkter auf dem Gebiet begründet sind. Objekte Lind Ideen werden entsprechend der Aktivitätssphäre angeordnet, mit der sie Primär verbunden sind. Das Ziel der Klassifikation ist es. Objekte etc. auf ihre Funktion im Kontext rnit anderen Objekten zu beziehen. Der Hammer eines Zimmermannes könnte mit allen weiteren Schlagwerkzeugen, ohne Rücksicht auf die Gewerke and Industriezweige, in denen sie benutzt wurden, klassifiziert werden, aber dies ist nicht das Ziel von SHIC. 2. Der Aufbau von SHIC Es gibt vier primäre Rubriken (Abschnitte), die alle Aktivitäten des Menschen als eines gesellschaftlichen Wesens umfassen: Abschnitt 1: Gesellschaftliches Leben Abschnitt 2: Häusliches und Familiäres Leben Abschnitt 3: Persönliches Leben Abschnitt 4: Arbeitsleben Diese vier Abschnitte werden als von gleicher Bedeutsamkeit betrachtet, aller schließen sich nicht immer wechselseitig ans. Es müssen gelegentlich eigenmächtige Entscheidungen angewendet werden, um die Zuordnung des Materials zu bestimmen. Der Rest der Klassifikation ist als eine Hierarchie mit einer Dezimalstruktur angeordnet, die die Anwendung einer Zahlenkodierung erleichtert. Die nächsten vier Sturen unter den Abschnitten sind in absteigender Ordnung als Abteilung, Klasse Gruppe und Untergruppe bekannt. Jede Rubrik innerhalb dieser Stufen kann in zehn Untergruppen zwischen 0 und 9 unterteilt werden. Von diesen Untergruppen ist die erste (0) immer für allgemeines oder Material unbekannter Herkunft reserviert. und die letzte (9) wird gewöhnlich benutzt, um unbedeutende vermischte Kategorien zusammenzufassen, die nicht anderweitig in die anderen Rubriken eingefügt werden können. Sie können dann, wenn nötig, auf der nächst unteren Stufe getrennt werden.

Imprint

Sheffield : University of Sheffield

0.004779641 = product of:
  0.021508384 = sum of:
    0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0125971865 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
    0.008911197 = weight(_text_:of in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008911197 = score(doc=2398,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both

0.003972234 = product of:
  0.035750106 = sum of:
    0.035750106 = product of:
      0.07150021 = sum of:
        0.07150021 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07150021 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

5. 3.1999 17:40:22

0.0029791754 = product of:
  0.026812578 = sum of:
    0.026812578 = product of:
      0.053625155 = sum of:
        0.053625155 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053625155 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.0024826464 = product of:
  0.022343816 = sum of:
    0.022343816 = product of:
      0.044687632 = sum of:
        0.044687632 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044687632 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.0022140045 = product of:
  0.019926041 = sum of:
    0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019926041 = score(doc=4290,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

This article examines the sociotechnological impact of introducing collaborative technologies into the Spurlock Museum, a museum of world history and culture at the University of Illinois

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.24-32

0.0020957165 = product of:
  0.018861448 = sum of:
    0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018861448 = score(doc=3477,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation

0.0019703398 = product of:
  0.017733058 = sum of:
    0.017733058 = weight(_text_:of in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017733058 = score(doc=4288,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Users interact with museum application interfaces for many reasons. There are various types of users, who want to perform various tasks, in various contexts, that can access the same Web site. Thus, it is important to have user interfaces able to adapt to these different user requirements to facilitate the accomplishment of the desired goals. Most current interfaces to museum information do not take into account this variety of types of users, thus providing interfaces that some users find confusing to achieve their goals. In this article we discuss the various possible levels of support that can be given to different users during navigation of museum information. In particular, we focus our attention on how to obtain adaptable and adaptive interfaces using the web site for the Marble Museum, which we have designed and developed, as a source of examples for our discussion of possible solutions

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.5-13

0.0019402565 = product of:
  0.017462308 = sum of:
    0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017462308 = score(doc=6100,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Twenty years of experience with computers in museums has led from the original 'purely scientific' objectives to a more down-to-earth approach aimed at rationalizing repetitive procedures. Dealing with fragmentary or unclean data is of primary concern. In the 'small museums' project useful techniques from the field of thesaurus applications are customized in daily practice for this purpose

Source

Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm

0.0019402565 = product of:
  0.017462308 = sum of:
    0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 7189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017462308 = score(doc=7189,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 7189, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7189)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

A preliminary survey of poster collections in libraries, museums, and archives in the Netherlands revealed a wealth of material about which little was known. A deteiled survey was, therefore, undertaken in 1992 by the Rijksdienst Beeldende Kunst of 14 institutiions known to hold poster collections. As a result of the project the Database Nederlandse Affiches has been compiled to record details of the 72.000 items identified. Other institutions have now begun to submit details of their holdings to the database

0.001833752 = product of:
  0.016503768 = sum of:
    0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016503768 = score(doc=625,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03298316 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

EC project PRESTO has completed a survey of the holdings and preservation status of ten major broadcast archives. These archives represent a significant portion of total European broadcast archives, including some ofthe largest individual collections.The main findings are that approximately 75% of this material is at risk or inaccessible and that the collections are growing at roughly four times the rate of current progress in preservation work. This article gives detailed results of the survey, and describes the technical developments being produced by project PRESTO to reduce the costs and improve the effectiveness of multimedia archive preservation projects.