-
Classification and information control : Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968 (1969)
0.05
0.05121156 = product of:
0.11522601 = sum of:
0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026182763 = score(doc=3402,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.015122802 = weight(_text_:of in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015122802 = score(doc=3402,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.018624624 = product of:
0.03724925 = sum of:
0.03724925 = weight(_text_:problems in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03724925 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.055295818 = product of:
0.110591635 = sum of:
0.110591635 = weight(_text_:exercises in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110591635 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2345736 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.47145814 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes; KYLE, B.R.F.: Lessons learned from experience in drafting the Kyle classification; MILLS, J.: Inadequacies of exing general classification schemes; COATES, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Notes on initial work for NATO classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using mining terms; TOMLINSON, H.: Relationship between geology and mining; TOMLINSON, H.: Use of categories for sculpture; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using terms from physics; TOMLINSON, H.: The distinction between physical and chemical entities; TOMLINSON, H.: Concepts within politics; TOMLINSON, H.: Problems arising from first GCS papers; AUSTIN, D.: The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification; AUSTIN, D.: Demonstration: provisional scheme for naturally occuring entities; AUSTIN, D.: Stages in classing and exercises; AUSTIN, D.: Report to the Library Association Research Committee on the use of the NATO grant
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association research publications; no.1
-
Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001)
0.02
0.024703896 = product of:
0.074111685 = sum of:
0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125971865 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015434646 = score(doc=1482,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.046079848 = product of:
0.092159696 = sum of:
0.092159696 = weight(_text_:exercises in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092159696 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2345736 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.39288178 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Colon Classification (CC) is truly the first freely faceted scheme for library classification devised and propagated by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. The scheme is being taught in theory and practice to the students in most of the LIS schools in India and abroad also. Many manuals, Guide books and Introductory works have been published on CC in the past. But the present work tread a new path in presenting CC to the student, teaching and professional community. The present work Colon Classification: Theory and Practice; A Self Instructional Manual is the result of author's twenty-five years experience of teaching theory and practice of CC to the students of LIS. For the first ime concerted and systematic attempt has been made to present theory and practice of CC in self-instructional mode, keeping in view the requirements of students learners of Open Universities/ Distance Education Institutions in particular. The other singificant and novel features introduced in this manual are: Presenting the scope of each block consisting certain units bollowed by objectives, introduction, sections, sub-sections, self check exercises, glossary and assignment of each unit. It is hoped that all these features will help the users/readers of this manual to understand and grasp quickly, the intricacies involved in theory and practice of CC(6th Edition). The manual is presented in three blocks and twelve units.
-
Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984)
0.02
0.023461144 = product of:
0.07038343 = sum of:
0.0342871 = product of:
0.0685742 = sum of:
0.0685742 = weight(_text_:headings in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0685742 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015940834 = score(doc=4521,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- J. Kaiser (1868-1927) developed a system of subject indexing based on what he called "concretes" and "processes" to govern the form of subject headings and subdivisions. Although Kaiser applied his systematic indexing to specialized technical and business collections, his ideas are entirely applicable to all book collections and catalogs. Though largely ignored, Kaiser's system is of permanent interest in the study of the development of subject analysis
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 28(1984), S.163-174
-
Dutta, B.: Ranganathan's elucidation of subject in the light of 'Infinity (8)' (2015)
0.02
0.022824481 = product of:
0.06847344 = sum of:
0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181897 = score(doc=2794,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019926041 = score(doc=2794,freq=40.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.026728429 = product of:
0.053456858 = sum of:
0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053456858 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews Ranganathan's description of subject from mathematical angle. Ranganathan was highly influenced by Nineteenth Century mathematician George Cantor and he used the concept of infinity in developing an axiomatic interpretation of subject. Majority of library scientists interpreted the concept of subject merely as a term or descriptor or heading to include the same in cataloguing and subject indexing. Some library scientists interpreted subject on the basis of document, i.e. from the angle of the concept of aboutness or epistemological potential of the document etc. Some people explained subject from the viewpoint of social, cultural or socio-cultural process. Attempts were made to describe subject from epistemological viewpoint. But S R Ranganathan was the first to develop an axiomatic concept of subject on its own. He built up an independent idea of subject that is ubiquitously pervasive with human cognition process. To develop the basic foundation of subject, he used the mathematical concepts of infinity and infinitesimal and construed the set of subjects or universe of subjects as continuous infinite universe. The subject may also exist in extremely micro-form, which was termed as spot subject and analogized with point, which is dimensionless having only an existence. The influence of Twentieth Century physicist George Gamow on Ranganathan's thought has also been discussed.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.255-264
-
Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017)
0.02
0.02066971 = product of:
0.06200913 = sum of:
0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125971865 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.018370902 = weight(_text_:of in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018370902 = score(doc=5800,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.031041041 = product of:
0.062082082 = sum of:
0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062082082 = score(doc=5800,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
- Source
- Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
-
Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998)
0.02
0.02020604 = product of:
0.060618117 = sum of:
0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941156 = score(doc=851,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=851,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.02172873 = product of:
0.04345746 = sum of:
0.04345746 = weight(_text_:problems in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345746 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Comparison between grounded theory (a qualitative social science research methodology of Glaser and Strauss) and facet classification (Ranganathan)
- Content
- This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft "How Classifications Work: Problems and Challenges in an Electronic Age"
- Source
- Library trends. 47(1998) no.2, S.218-232
-
Chatterjee, A.; Choudhury, G.G.: CC7: an evaluation of its development in three planes (1989)
0.02
0.019359436 = product of:
0.058078304 = sum of:
0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01763606 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018713512 = score(doc=517,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
0.02172873 = product of:
0.04345746 = sum of:
0.04345746 = weight(_text_:problems in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04345746 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Reviews the new edition of CC, which has incorporated most of the developments in the idea plane and notational plane reported in the literature during the previous 20 years, making it a 'freely faceted' scheme. However, some errors have crept in which are bound to create problems for the users. Both these aspects have been critically examined here drawing comparison, where necessary, with the previous edition of the scheme. Reveals the enormously improved capabilities of the scheme in meeting the challenge posed by the ever expanding horizon of the universe of subjects as also the inconsistencies and lack of cohesion in various schedules
- Source
- Annals of library science and documentation. 36(1989) nos.1/2, S.1-27
-
Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019)
0.02
0.019301374 = product of:
0.057904117 = sum of:
0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026182763 = score(doc=5406,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.01309673 = weight(_text_:of in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01309673 = score(doc=5406,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.018624624 = product of:
0.03724925 = sum of:
0.03724925 = weight(_text_:problems in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03724925 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.02
0.018964 = product of:
0.056892 = sum of:
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861448 = score(doc=5083,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.017875053 = product of:
0.035750106 = sum of:
0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035750106 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
- Source
- Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171
-
Aparecida Moura, M.: Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS) : the contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group (CRG) (2014)
0.02
0.01734645 = product of:
0.07805902 = sum of:
0.019421503 = weight(_text_:of in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019421503 = score(doc=1395,freq=38.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.37654874 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.058637515 = weight(_text_:congress in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058637515 = score(doc=1395,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the discursive formations emerging from the Social Semantic Information Spaces (SSIS) in light of the concept of emergence in the theory of integrative levels. The study aims to identify the opportunities and challenges of incorporating epistemological considerations in the act of acquiring knowledge into the consolidation of knowledge organization and mediation processes and devices in the emergence of phenomena. The goal was to analyze the effects of that concept on the actions of a sample of researchers registered in an emerging research domain in SSIS in order to understand this type of indexing done by the users and communities as a classification of integrating levels. The methodology was established by triangulation through social network analysis, consensus analysis and archaeology of knowledge. It was possible to conclude that there is a collective effort to settle a semantic interoperability model for the labeling of contents based on best practices regarding the description of the objects shared in SSIS.
- Footnote
- Papers from I Congress of ISKO Spain and Portugal / XI Congress ISKO Spain, 7-9 November 2013, University of Porto.
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995)
0.02
0.016268058 = product of:
0.04880417 = sum of:
0.021429438 = product of:
0.042858876 = sum of:
0.042858876 = weight(_text_:headings in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042858876 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125971865 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.014777548 = weight(_text_:of in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014777548 = score(doc=5563,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
-
Mills, J.: Library classification (1970)
0.02
0.015158031 = product of:
0.06821114 = sum of:
0.050388746 = weight(_text_:library in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050388746 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.017822394 = weight(_text_:of in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017822394 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 26(1970), S.120-160
-
Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969)
0.01
0.013617299 = product of:
0.061277844 = sum of:
0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04275627 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
0.018521573 = weight(_text_:of in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018521573 = score(doc=1286,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association Research Publications; no.1
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Sukhmaneva, E.G.: Modern development of faceted classification
0.01
0.013045849 = product of:
0.05870632 = sum of:
0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015940834 = score(doc=3132,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.042765487 = product of:
0.085530974 = sum of:
0.085530974 = weight(_text_:etc in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085530974 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others. The concepts of Fundamental Categories, Rounds and Levels, Integrative Levels, etc. are discussed.
- Content
- English version of a Russion paper first published in the series Sciebtific and Technical Information (Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsya), Series 2 No.11.
-
Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969)
0.01
0.011877713 = product of:
0.053449705 = sum of:
0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04275627 = score(doc=1285,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association Research Publications; no.1
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970)
0.01
0.011877713 = product of:
0.053449705 = sum of:
0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04275627 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0106934365 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Library Association research publication; no.2
-
Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024)
0.01
0.011759434 = product of:
0.05291745 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=1158,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.022684202 = weight(_text_:of in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022684202 = score(doc=1158,freq=36.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.43980673 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Colon Classification : Pt.1: Rules of classification; Pt.2: Schedules of classification; Pt.3: Index to the schedules (1933)
0.01
0.011758976 = product of:
0.05291539 = sum of:
0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527212 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01764327 = score(doc=1833,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Imprint
- Madras : The Madras Library Association
-
Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017)
0.01
0.011415119 = product of:
0.051368035 = sum of:
0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01394823 = score(doc=3614,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.037419803 = product of:
0.07483961 = sum of:
0.07483961 = weight(_text_:etc in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07483961 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.011320222 = product of:
0.050940998 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.02070775 = weight(_text_:of in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02070775 = score(doc=831,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
- Source
- Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.515-540
