-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.03
0.029522402 = product of:
0.066425405 = sum of:
0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015116624 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.019277865 = weight(_text_:of in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019277865 = score(doc=3564,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.018624624 = product of:
0.03724925 = sum of:
0.03724925 = weight(_text_:problems in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03724925 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013406289 = product of:
0.026812578 = sum of:
0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026812578 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
- Source
- ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
-
Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994)
0.02
0.020816881 = product of:
0.06245064 = sum of:
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017462308 = score(doc=2424,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.024832834 = product of:
0.049665667 = sum of:
0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049665667 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
- Source
- Advances in library automation and networking. Vol.5. Ed.: J.A. Hewitt and C.W. Bailey
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017)
0.02
0.018007366 = product of:
0.054022096 = sum of:
0.021429438 = product of:
0.042858876 = sum of:
0.042858876 = weight(_text_:headings in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042858876 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017815111 = weight(_text_:library in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017815111 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.014777548 = weight(_text_:of in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014777548 = score(doc=3868,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018)
0.02
0.015542987 = product of:
0.04662896 = sum of:
0.021429438 = product of:
0.042858876 = sum of:
0.042858876 = weight(_text_:headings in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042858876 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0125971865 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.012602335 = weight(_text_:of in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012602335 = score(doc=4300,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
-
Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982)
0.01
0.01385733 = product of:
0.062357984 = sum of:
0.04988231 = weight(_text_:library in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04988231 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012475675 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Imprint
- London : Library Association
- Series
- Case studies in library automation; no.1
-
Hane, P.J.: AOL acquires Personal Library Software (1998)
0.01
0.0119968075 = product of:
0.053985633 = sum of:
0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03527212 = score(doc=1813,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018713512 = score(doc=1813,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In Jan 1997 AOL annouced its acquisition of Personal Library Software, a leading developer of information indexing and search technologies, which are at the core of online a CD-ROM products from major providers such as Dow Jones and Knight Ridder. AOL is the world's leading Internet online service. Quotes the company heads concerning the advantages of the deal for searchers but reports that no specific details of its terms have been released. Outlines the history of the companies focusing on the role of Matthew Koll founder of Personal Library Software and now joining AOL and the reactions of information professionals
- Object
- Personal Library Software
-
Ashford, J.H.: Free text retrieval in the Welsh language : problems, and proposed working practice (1995)
0.01
0.011346614 = product of:
0.051059764 = sum of:
0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015940834 = score(doc=6509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
0.03511893 = product of:
0.07023786 = sum of:
0.07023786 = weight(_text_:problems in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07023786 = score(doc=6509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.5159344 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A bilingual Welsh-English full text database is planned for Inspection Reports of Her Majesty's Inspectors of Schools for Wales. Special requirements for free text retrieval in the Welsh language are identified, and practical solutions are proposed for problems arising from the use of standard text database products, some of which may also apply to other lesser-used languages
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 51(1995) no.2, S.118-125
-
Poler, E.M.: Overcoming limitations in database searches (1992)
0.01
0.011326019 = product of:
0.050967082 = sum of:
0.019926041 = weight(_text_:of in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019926041 = score(doc=2329,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
0.031041041 = product of:
0.062082082 = sum of:
0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062082082 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Describes the advantages of full text databases and full text searching, particularly in the context of law databases, the drawbacks to such searching in terms of recall, precision and errors, and methods of overcoming some of these problems
-
Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015)
0.01
0.010587662 = product of:
0.04764448 = sum of:
0.030001212 = product of:
0.060002424 = sum of:
0.060002424 = weight(_text_:headings in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060002424 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01764327 = weight(_text_:of in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01764327 = score(doc=2007,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
-
Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997)
0.01
0.010525695 = product of:
0.04736563 = sum of:
0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02850418 = score(doc=751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.018861448 = weight(_text_:of in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861448 = score(doc=751,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.01
0.010306496 = product of:
0.04637923 = sum of:
0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02850418 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.017875053 = product of:
0.035750106 = sum of:
0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035750106 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
- Source
- Library technology news. 9(1993), S.3-4
-
Falk, H.: Building and using document databases (1998)
0.01
0.010079122 = product of:
0.04535605 = sum of:
0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030233247 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
0.015122802 = weight(_text_:of in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015122802 = score(doc=3858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Describes the available technology and commercial packages for scanning documents and enabling the creation of full text databases of documents
- Source
- Electronic library. 16(1998) no.1, S.55-59
-
Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996)
0.01
0.009559282 = product of:
0.04301677 = sum of:
0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025194373 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.017822394 = weight(_text_:of in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017822394 = score(doc=4719,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262
-
White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993)
0.01
0.0095026875 = product of:
0.042762093 = sum of:
0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02850418 = score(doc=2052,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=2052,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
- Source
- Library software review. 12(1993) no.2, S.54-68
-
Huang, Y.-L.: ¬A theoretic and empirical research of cluster indexing for Mandarine Chinese full text document (1998)
0.01
0.008077683 = product of:
0.036349572 = sum of:
0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01763606 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.018713512 = weight(_text_:of in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018713512 = score(doc=513,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Since most popular commercialized systems for full text retrieval are designed with full text scaning and Boolean logic query mode, these systems use an oversimplified relationship between the indexing form and the content of document. Reports the use of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to develop a Cluster Indexing Model (CIM) based on a Vector Space Model (VSM) in orer to explore the index theory of cluster indexing for chinese full text documents. From a series of experiments, it was found that the indexing performance of CIM is better than traditional VSM, and has almost equivalent effectiveness of the authority control of index terms
- Source
- Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.24, S.44-68
-
Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996)
0.01
0.007943424 = product of:
0.03574541 = sum of:
0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941156 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.010804252 = weight(_text_:of in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010804252 = score(doc=6757,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
- Object
- Personal Library Software
-
Quint, B.: Flipping for full-text (1991)
0.01
0.007647425 = product of:
0.034413412 = sum of:
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=4893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014257914 = score(doc=4893,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Provides tips for searchers of full text online databases and examines the coverage policies of full text database producers which may change without notification to users. Most full text newspaper files do not carry even bibliographic listings for syndicated columns not created by their own staff. Looks at the development of full-text CD-ROM databases and claims that full-text, though expensive, is the wave of the future
- Source
- Wilson library bulletin. 66(1991) no.1, S.82-85
-
Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998)
0.01
0.007586628 = product of:
0.034139827 = sum of:
0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01763606 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016503768 = score(doc=3566,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses the introduction of hypermedia in information delivery and its advantages. Describes the special features in the design of full text databases and steps in developing in-house hypermedia databases. It may not be the job of the library professionals to design and develop the hypermedia system for information retrieval, but their ideas and experience will play an important role
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 5th National Convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), at Bhubaneswar, 4-5 March 1998
- Source
- Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
-
Falk, H.: Document file searching (1998)
0.01
0.0075790156 = product of:
0.03410557 = sum of:
0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025194373 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.008911197 = weight(_text_:of in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008911197 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Considers the importance of generating indexes when creating large document files, to facilitate searching, and evaluates 4 commercial document file index creation and searching software packages: QuickFind; Sonar; ZyIndex; and FastFind
- Source
- Electronic library. 16(1998) no.3, S.199-203
-
Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985)
0.01
0.0072229374 = product of:
0.032503217 = sum of:
0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020155499 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012347717 = score(doc=1459,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03298316 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
- Source
- Online public access to library files. Conf. Proc. held at the Univ. of Bath, 3.-5.9.1984. Ed.: J. Kinsella
