Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.10
    0.102313645 = product of:
      0.18416455 = sum of:
        0.04454025 = product of:
          0.0890805 = sum of:
            0.0890805 = weight(_text_:headings in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0890805 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.55686975 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04275627 = score(doc=3601,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.01309673 = weight(_text_:of in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01309673 = score(doc=3601,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.07036502 = weight(_text_:congress in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07036502 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.3, S.174-184
  2. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.10
    0.10036811 = product of:
      0.18066259 = sum of:
        0.05143065 = product of:
          0.1028613 = sum of:
            0.1028613 = weight(_text_:headings in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1028613 = score(doc=3602,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026182763 = score(doc=3602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.019277865 = weight(_text_:of in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019277865 = score(doc=3602,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.07036502 = weight(_text_:congress in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07036502 = score(doc=3602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.4, S.243-250
  3. ¬A world bibliography of bibliographies 1964-1974 : a list of works represented by Library of Congress printed catalog cards, a decennial supplement to Theodore Bestermann (1977) 0.06
    0.057658996 = product of:
      0.17297699 = sum of:
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
        0.021608504 = weight(_text_:of in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021608504 = score(doc=3960,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
        0.11609636 = weight(_text_:congress in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11609636 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.73786974 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
  4. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.05
    0.046822555 = product of:
      0.10535075 = sum of:
        0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030233247 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.011955625 = weight(_text_:of in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011955625 = score(doc=125,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.049755584 = weight(_text_:congress in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049755584 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.2, S.123-133
  5. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.04
    0.0446755 = product of:
      0.10051987 = sum of:
        0.051963624 = product of:
          0.10392725 = sum of:
            0.10392725 = weight(_text_:headings in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10392725 = score(doc=3600,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.6496814 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01763606 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
        0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015279518 = score(doc=3600,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
        0.01564067 = product of:
          0.03128134 = sum of:
            0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128134 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.1, S.25-40
  6. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.04
    0.0421853 = product of:
      0.12655589 = sum of:
        0.060002424 = product of:
          0.12000485 = sum of:
            0.12000485 = weight(_text_:headings in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12000485 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.75018746 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
        0.03128134 = product of:
          0.06256268 = sum of:
            0.06256268 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06256268 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.4, S.266-
  7. Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005) 0.03
    0.03104665 = product of:
      0.06985496 = sum of:
        0.021429438 = product of:
          0.042858876 = sum of:
            0.042858876 = weight(_text_:headings in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042858876 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02181897 = score(doc=124,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015434646 = score(doc=124,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.011171908 = product of:
          0.022343816 = sum of:
            0.022343816 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022343816 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Location
    Cornell University Library
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.3, S.190-203
  8. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.03
    0.028858522 = product of:
      0.064931676 = sum of:
        0.025715325 = product of:
          0.05143065 = sum of:
            0.05143065 = weight(_text_:headings in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05143065 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015116624 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=2603,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 57(2013) no.2, S.100-117
  9. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.03
    0.02724161 = product of:
      0.06129362 = sum of:
        0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015116624 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.014146087 = weight(_text_:of in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014146087 = score(doc=302,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.018624624 = product of:
          0.03724925 = sum of:
            0.03724925 = weight(_text_:problems in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03724925 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
  10. Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001) 0.02
    0.024703896 = product of:
      0.074111685 = sum of:
        0.0125971865 = weight(_text_:library in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0125971865 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
        0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015434646 = score(doc=1482,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
        0.046079848 = product of:
          0.092159696 = sum of:
            0.092159696 = weight(_text_:exercises in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092159696 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2345736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.39288178 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC) is truly the first freely faceted scheme for library classification devised and propagated by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. The scheme is being taught in theory and practice to the students in most of the LIS schools in India and abroad also. Many manuals, Guide books and Introductory works have been published on CC in the past. But the present work tread a new path in presenting CC to the student, teaching and professional community. The present work Colon Classification: Theory and Practice; A Self Instructional Manual is the result of author's twenty-five years experience of teaching theory and practice of CC to the students of LIS. For the first ime concerted and systematic attempt has been made to present theory and practice of CC in self-instructional mode, keeping in view the requirements of students learners of Open Universities/ Distance Education Institutions in particular. The other singificant and novel features introduced in this manual are: Presenting the scope of each block consisting certain units bollowed by objectives, introduction, sections, sub-sections, self check exercises, glossary and assignment of each unit. It is hoped that all these features will help the users/readers of this manual to understand and grasp quickly, the intricacies involved in theory and practice of CC(6th Edition). The manual is presented in three blocks and twelve units.
  11. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.02
    0.02410863 = product of:
      0.072325885 = sum of:
        0.0342871 = product of:
          0.0685742 = sum of:
            0.0685742 = weight(_text_:headings in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0685742 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020163735 = score(doc=4226,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 30(1995), S.385-416
  12. Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005) 0.02
    0.023415904 = product of:
      0.07024771 = sum of:
        0.03491035 = weight(_text_:library in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03491035 = score(doc=455,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
        0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017462308 = score(doc=455,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Library vendors' use of Unicode is leading to library systems with multiscript capability, which offers the prospect of multiscript authority records. Although librarians tend to focus on Unicode in relation to non-Roman scripts, language is a more important feature of authority records than script. The concept of a catalog locale (of which language is one aspect) is introduced. Restrictions on the structure and content of a MARC 21 authority record are outlined, and the alternative structures for authority records containing languages written in non-Roman scripts are described.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.4, S.243-249
  13. Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005) 0.02
    0.022515735 = product of:
      0.0675472 = sum of:
        0.03999483 = weight(_text_:library in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03999483 = score(doc=122,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.46116722 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.014146087 = weight(_text_:of in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014146087 = score(doc=122,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.3, S.175-188
  14. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.02
    0.020572348 = product of:
      0.06171704 = sum of:
        0.03527212 = weight(_text_:library in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03527212 = score(doc=128,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.010804252 = weight(_text_:of in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010804252 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.01564067 = product of:
          0.03128134 = sum of:
            0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128134 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.40-48
  15. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.02
    0.020212382 = product of:
      0.060637146 = sum of:
        0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02850418 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014257914 = score(doc=1085,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.10-15
  16. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.02
    0.020045152 = product of:
      0.060135454 = sum of:
        0.030546555 = weight(_text_:library in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030546555 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
        0.01394823 = weight(_text_:of in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01394823 = score(doc=3599,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
        0.01564067 = product of:
          0.03128134 = sum of:
            0.03128134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128134 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.4, S.230-237
  17. Zainab, A.N.; Silva, S.M. de: Expert systems in library and information services : publication trends, authorship patterns and expressiveness of published titles (1998) 0.02
    0.019773696 = product of:
      0.059321087 = sum of:
        0.017815111 = weight(_text_:library in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017815111 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.014777548 = weight(_text_:of in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014777548 = score(doc=2927,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.026728429 = product of:
          0.053456858 = sum of:
            0.053456858 = weight(_text_:etc in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053456858 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a state of the art review of the literature of expert systems in library and information science, involving exhaustive searches of all major LIS CD-ROM databases (LISA, ERIC, LiLi, INSPEC etc.) and bibliographies appended in review articles. The search retrieved 679 references, comprising 362 periodical articles, 180 conference proceedings, 63 books articles, 28 theses and 46 monographs. The growth of the literature peaked between 1989 and 1990 and subsequently declined after 1992. Over 1/3 (287) covered intelligent front ends and interfaces for online searching and retrieval, followed by applications in reference service (113), classification, indexing and abstracting (86) and cataloguing (7). The most productive periodicals comprised 6 titles, of which 'Information processing and management' topped the lsit: 43 authors were found to contribute between 5 and 35 articles each, hence contributing 32,19% of the total contributors. 382 of the publications were single author works, 172 were by 2 authors, 72 were by 3 authors and 49 were by 4 or more authors. Only 161 titles were expressive enough to reveal both the name and function of systems being developed
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.313-336
  18. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.02
    0.019575652 = product of:
      0.05872695 = sum of:
        0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02850418 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.012347717 = weight(_text_:of in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012347717 = score(doc=249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
  19. Høyrup, E.: Books about mathematics : history, philosophy, education, models, system theory, and works of reference etc (1979) 0.02
    0.019403396 = product of:
      0.08731528 = sum of:
        0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012475675 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
        0.07483961 = product of:
          0.14967921 = sum of:
            0.14967921 = weight(_text_:etc in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14967921 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.83782077 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  20. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.019398097 = product of:
      0.058194287 = sum of:
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020163735 = score(doc=43,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.017875053 = product of:
          0.035750106 = sum of:
            0.035750106 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035750106 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.27-31

Authors

Languages

  • e 106
  • d 8
  • m 4
  • nl 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 64
  • m 29
  • i 10
  • el 9
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…