Search (215 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.06
    0.06345081 = product of:
      0.14276433 = sum of:
        0.030001212 = product of:
          0.060002424 = sum of:
            0.060002424 = weight(_text_:headings in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060002424 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03943543 = weight(_text_:library in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943543 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015279518 = score(doc=367,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05804818 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  2. Coles, B.R.: ¬The scientific, technical and medical information system in the UK : a study on behalf of the Royal Society, the British Library and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (1993) 0.04
    0.040255044 = product of:
      0.09057385 = sum of:
        0.02181897 = weight(_text_:library in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02181897 = score(doc=5350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
        0.015434646 = weight(_text_:of in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015434646 = score(doc=5350,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
        0.0155205205 = product of:
          0.031041041 = sum of:
            0.031041041 = weight(_text_:problems in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031041041 = score(doc=5350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03779971 = product of:
          0.07559942 = sum of:
            0.07559942 = weight(_text_:etc in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07559942 = score(doc=5350,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17865302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.4231634 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the findings of the major study, carried out by the Royal Society, etc. and prompted by the concern felt about the increasing signs of strain in the scientific, technical and medical information systems (STM) and the consequences for technical research. The report is a follow up to the earlier study (BLRDD report 5626) with the aim of covering the trends which have developed since the earlier report was published (online information retrieval, electronic networks, CD-ROM etc.). The study covers: the nature of the UK scientific, technical and medical information system; users of the STM information system; the changing role of libraries and librarians with regard to periodicals, books and other services; economic aspects of the STM information system (research libraries, primary publishing, secondary publishing, and value of scientific research); economic aspects of the STM information system, and perceived problems and potential changes with regard to primary periodicals, electronic periodicals, user interaction, and funding of the services. The data derived from the user survey and the library survey are published in full with analysis. Presents the conclusions and recommendations arising from the study
    Imprint
    London : British Library / Research and Development Department
  3. Cawkell, A.E.: Indexing collections of electronic images : a review (1993) 0.04
    0.037435755 = product of:
      0.112307265 = sum of:
        0.02850418 = weight(_text_:library in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02850418 = score(doc=8313,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
        0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017462308 = score(doc=8313,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
        0.06634078 = weight(_text_:congress in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06634078 = score(doc=8313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses articles in which indexing of image collections receives virtually no mention and continues with comments about articles in which indexing receives special attention. Describes four major indexing systems: Library of Congress, AAT, ICONCLASS and TELCLASS. Discusses new indexing approaches where the use of descriptive words is being replaced by other methods of retrieval. Describes indexing by content (attempting to match an input image to a database collection) and by using a visual thesaurus. Raises questions about indexing for various kinds of collections and discusses indexing philosophy
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  4. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.03
    0.032657504 = product of:
      0.097972505 = sum of:
        0.060466494 = weight(_text_:library in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060466494 = score(doc=234,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.69721925 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
        0.026812578 = product of:
          0.053625155 = sum of:
            0.053625155 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053625155 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Imprint
    London : British Library
    Pages
    22 S
    Series
    British Library: Library and Information Commission research report; 74
  5. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.03
    0.031530682 = product of:
      0.09459204 = sum of:
        0.033424113 = weight(_text_:library in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033424113 = score(doc=5013,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.38540247 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
        0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014257914 = score(doc=5013,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
        0.046910014 = weight(_text_:congress in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046910014 = score(doc=5013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2981444 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  6. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.03
    0.03144268 = product of:
      0.09432803 = sum of:
        0.025068086 = weight(_text_:library in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068086 = score(doc=1271,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28905186 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
        0.01363151 = weight(_text_:of in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01363151 = score(doc=1271,freq=52.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.26429096 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                52.0 = termFreq=52.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
        0.055628434 = weight(_text_:congress in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055628434 = score(doc=1271,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.35355577 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
    The Library of Congress must begin by prioritizing the recommendations that are directed in whole or in part at LC. Some define tasks that can be achieved immediately and with moderate effort; others will require analysis and planning that will have to be coordinated broadly and carefully. The Working Group has consciously not associated time frames with any of its recommendations. The recommendations fall into five general areas: 1. Increase the efficiency of bibliographic production for all libraries through increased cooperation and increased sharing of bibliographic records, and by maximizing the use of data produced throughout the entire "supply chain" for information resources. 2. Transfer effort into higher-value activity. In particular, expand the possibilities for knowledge creation by "exposing" rare and unique materials held by libraries that are currently hidden from view and, thus, underused. 3. Position our technology for the future by recognizing that the World Wide Web is both our technology platform and the appropriate platform for the delivery of our standards. Recognize that people are not the only users of the data we produce in the name of bibliographic control, but so too are machine applications that interact with those data in a variety of ways. 4. Position our community for the future by facilitating the incorporation of evaluative and other user-supplied information into our resource descriptions. Work to realize the potential of the FRBR framework for revealing and capitalizing on the various relationships that exist among information resources. 5. Strengthen the library profession through education and the development of metrics that will inform decision-making now and in the future. The Working Group intends what follows to serve as a broad blueprint for the Library of Congress and its colleagues in the library and information technology communities for extending and promoting access to information resources.
    Editor
    Library of Congress / Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control
  7. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.03
    0.03121311 = product of:
      0.09363933 = sum of:
        0.04988231 = weight(_text_:library in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04988231 = score(doc=3473,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012475675 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.03128134 = product of:
          0.06256268 = sum of:
            0.06256268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06256268 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  8. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.03
    0.026754094 = product of:
      0.08026228 = sum of:
        0.04275627 = weight(_text_:library in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04275627 = score(doc=2538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.026812578 = product of:
          0.053625155 = sum of:
            0.053625155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053625155 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Editor
    American Library Association / Library Instruction Round Table / 15th Anniversary Task Force
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  9. Perkins, C.; Guest, P.: Operationalizing a sheet based cartographic information retrieval system (1993) 0.02
    0.022945916 = product of:
      0.06883775 = sum of:
        0.025194373 = weight(_text_:library in 6573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194373 = score(doc=6573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 6573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6573)
        0.012602335 = weight(_text_:of in 6573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012602335 = score(doc=6573,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 6573, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6573)
        0.031041041 = product of:
          0.062082082 = sum of:
            0.062082082 = weight(_text_:problems in 6573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062082082 = score(doc=6573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 6573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates and evaluates possible solutions to the problems facing map libraries wishing to gain carto-bibliographic control of its collections at the level of the sheet within the series. Assesses record availability and quality
    Imprint
    London : British Library Research and Development Department
  10. Bell, J.: ¬The far north and beyond : an index to Canadian science fiction and fantasy in english-language genre magazines and other selected periodicals of the pulp era, 1896-1955 (1998) 0.02
    0.022900172 = product of:
      0.068700515 = sum of:
        0.0342871 = product of:
          0.0685742 = sum of:
            0.0685742 = weight(_text_:headings in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0685742 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
        0.014257914 = weight(_text_:of in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014257914 = score(doc=3727,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Aims to provide an accurate and comprehensive bibliographic description of Canadian science fiction and fantasy literature in english language pulp magazines published between 1896 and 1955, a fragile and increasingly elusive periodical genre which contains a virtually unknown selection of popular fiction and art by Canadians. The arrangement is alphabetical under the following headings: author index; title index; artist index; magazine index; and series index
    Imprint
    Halifax, Nova Scotia : Dalhousie University, School of Library and Information Studies
  11. Symons, J.: Information needs of management researchers (1995) 0.02
    0.02287747 = product of:
      0.06863241 = sum of:
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
        0.023644077 = weight(_text_:of in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023644077 = score(doc=2380,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.458417 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
        0.024832834 = product of:
          0.049665667 = sum of:
            0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049665667 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of the needs of management researchers in relation to their consumption and use of information. A profile of the management researcher was drawn up based on a questionnaire survey of the views of 404 researchers, mostly at PhD level, studying at 53 different institutions in the UK. Results highlighted the importance of periodicals and the English language orientation of researchers, who appear to place little significance on continental European literature as a contribution to the resolution of their research problems
    Imprint
    London : British Library Research and Development Department
  12. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.022579756 = product of:
      0.06773926 = sum of:
        0.030233247 = weight(_text_:library in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030233247 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.026812578 = product of:
          0.053625155 = sum of:
            0.053625155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053625155 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
    Imprint
    Boston Spa : British Library, National Bibliographic Service
  13. Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999) 0.02
    0.02192272 = product of:
      0.06576816 = sum of:
        0.04242812 = product of:
          0.08485624 = sum of:
            0.08485624 = weight(_text_:headings in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08485624 = score(doc=6067,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012475675 = weight(_text_:of in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012475675 = score(doc=6067,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
        0.010864365 = product of:
          0.02172873 = sum of:
            0.02172873 = weight(_text_:problems in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02172873 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.15960906 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This final report defines the problem of multilingual subject access, summarises the work carried out by the CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access from autumn 1997 until February 1999 and its results, identifies and discusses issues to be resolved, and presents a proposal for a prototype to the directors of the institutions concerned. For a summary of results, and the proposal, see 'CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access: proposals for discussion, March 18th 1999. This report will be distributed to members of the CENL and posted on the GABRIEL website. Genevieve Clavel has compiled it on the basis of the group's reports, discussions within the group and comments provided by the partners.
    Content
    Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
  14. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.02
    0.021057885 = product of:
      0.06317365 = sum of:
        0.024941156 = weight(_text_:library in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024941156 = score(doc=6768,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
        0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016503768 = score(doc=6768,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
        0.02172873 = product of:
          0.04345746 = sum of:
            0.04345746 = weight(_text_:problems in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345746 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  15. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.02
    0.021044537 = product of:
      0.06313361 = sum of:
        0.025715325 = product of:
          0.05143065 = sum of:
            0.05143065 = weight(_text_:headings in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05143065 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021378135 = weight(_text_:library in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021378135 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
        0.016040152 = weight(_text_:of in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016040152 = score(doc=2433,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.
  16. Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Use of genetic algorithms in information retrieval (1995) 0.02
    0.020816881 = product of:
      0.06245064 = sum of:
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
        0.017462308 = weight(_text_:of in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017462308 = score(doc=2418,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
        0.024832834 = product of:
          0.049665667 = sum of:
            0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049665667 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the basic techniques involving genetic algorithms and their application to 2 problems in information retrieval: the generation of equifrequent groups of index terms; and the identification of optimal query and term weights. The algorithm developed for the generation of equifrequent groupings proved to be effective in operation, achieving results comparable with those obtained using a good deterministic algorithm. The algorithm developed for the identification of optimal query and term weighting involves fitness function that is based on full relevance information
    Imprint
    London : British Library Research and Development Department
  17. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.02
    0.020375915 = product of:
      0.06112774 = sum of:
        0.037028015 = weight(_text_:library in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037028015 = score(doc=1404,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
        0.0106934365 = weight(_text_:of in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0106934365 = score(doc=1404,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
    Imprint
    London : Bowker-Saur for British Library
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  18. Ayres, F.H.: QUALCAT : automation of quality control in cataloguing (1994) 0.02
    0.020309724 = product of:
      0.060929168 = sum of:
        0.020155499 = weight(_text_:library in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020155499 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
        0.015940834 = weight(_text_:of in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015940834 = score(doc=863,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
        0.024832834 = product of:
          0.049665667 = sum of:
            0.049665667 = weight(_text_:problems in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049665667 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The aims of the QUALCAT project were to: set up a large bibliographic database integrating records covering a range of material from a number of different databases by using USBC technology for cleaning, merging and control, develop an expert system to select the best records from a number of duplicate records; develop an expert system to link databases and centralized authority control; develop a fully automated quality control package for day to day running; and investigate interface problems for cataloguers using the system
    Imprint
    London : British Library / Research and Development Department
  19. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.01937845 = product of:
      0.058135346 = sum of:
        0.017815111 = weight(_text_:library in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017815111 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.018370902 = weight(_text_:of in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018370902 = score(doc=2627,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.021949332 = product of:
          0.043898664 = sum of:
            0.043898664 = weight(_text_:problems in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043898664 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13613719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.322459 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
    Imprint
    Los Angeles : California Univ., Inst. of Library Research
  20. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.02
    0.018832285 = product of:
      0.056496855 = sum of:
        0.026182763 = weight(_text_:library in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026182763 = score(doc=3685,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
        0.016907806 = weight(_text_:of in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907806 = score(doc=3685,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
        0.013406289 = product of:
          0.026812578 = sum of:
            0.026812578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026812578 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11550141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
    Imprint
    London : British Library
    Series
    British Library research and innovation report; 135

Authors

Languages

  • e 195
  • d 16
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 25
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…