Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.09
    0.08961343 = product of:
      0.35845372 = sum of:
        0.35845372 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35845372 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  2. Pathak, L.P.: Concept-term relationship and a classified schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' (2000) 0.07
    0.06600723 = product of:
      0.13201445 = sum of:
        0.08294755 = weight(_text_:headings in 6046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08294755 = score(doc=6046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 6046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6046)
        0.049066905 = product of:
          0.09813381 = sum of:
            0.09813381 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09813381 = score(doc=6046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.40798795 = fieldWeight in 6046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Draws attention to the efforts to define the terms 'concept' and 'term' and suggests a schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' under eight headings: 0. Concept; 1. Theoretical aspects; 2. Learning theory and Psychological aspects; 3. Origin, evolution, formation, construction; 4. Semantic aspects; 5.Terms and Terminology; 6. Usage and discipline-specific applications; and 7. Concepts and ISAR systems. The schedule also includes about 150 aspects/isolate terms related to 'concept' along with the name of the authors who have used them. The schedule is intended to help in identifying the various aspects of a concept with the help of the terms used for them. These aspects may guide to some extent, in dissecting and seeing the social science concepts from various point of views
  3. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.04
    0.03734617 = product of:
      0.07469234 = sum of:
        0.059248257 = weight(_text_:headings in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059248257 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
        0.015444082 = product of:
          0.030888164 = sum of:
            0.030888164 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030888164 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  4. Kageura, K.: Theories of terminology : a quest for a framework for the study of term formation (1999) 0.03
    0.03469554 = product of:
      0.13878216 = sum of:
        0.13878216 = product of:
          0.27756432 = sum of:
            0.27756432 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27756432 = score(doc=6290,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                1.1539642 = fieldWeight in 6290, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.21-40
  5. Temmerman, R.: Why traditional terminology theory impedes a realistic description of categories and terms in the life sciences (1999) 0.03
    0.03469554 = product of:
      0.13878216 = sum of:
        0.13878216 = product of:
          0.27756432 = sum of:
            0.27756432 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27756432 = score(doc=6291,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                1.1539642 = fieldWeight in 6291, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.77-92
  6. Rey, A.: Terminology between the experience of reality and the command of signs (1999) 0.03
    0.03469554 = product of:
      0.13878216 = sum of:
        0.13878216 = product of:
          0.27756432 = sum of:
            0.27756432 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27756432 = score(doc=6293,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                1.1539642 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.107-116
  7. Weissenhofer, P.: Conceptology in terminology : theory, semantics, and word-formation. A morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminology (1995) 0.03
    0.03433968 = product of:
      0.13735873 = sum of:
        0.13735873 = product of:
          0.27471745 = sum of:
            0.27471745 = weight(_text_:terminology in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27471745 = score(doc=4632,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                1.1421283 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This dissertation from the University of Vienna contains the following chapters: (1) Conceptological aspects in terminology theory. Post-Wüsterian sign models and the four-field model. Vagueness, prototypes, and the four-field model. Morphological aspects of terminology and prototype theory. Word-formation and its role in terminology theory and conceptology. (2) A morpho-conceptual classification system of the English baseball terminology. The classification system. Statistical results. Conclusions
  8. Zawada, B.; Swanepoel, P.: On the empirical adequacy of terminological concept theories : the case for prototype theory (1994) 0.03
    0.028038232 = product of:
      0.11215293 = sum of:
        0.11215293 = product of:
          0.22430585 = sum of:
            0.22430585 = weight(_text_:terminology in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22430585 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.9325439 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 1(1994) no.2, S.253-275
  9. Cabré, M.T.: Do we need an autonomous theory of terms? (1999) 0.03
    0.028038232 = product of:
      0.11215293 = sum of:
        0.11215293 = product of:
          0.22430585 = sum of:
            0.22430585 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22430585 = score(doc=6289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.9325439 = fieldWeight in 6289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.5-19
  10. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.03
    0.025245935 = product of:
      0.10098374 = sum of:
        0.10098374 = sum of:
          0.07009558 = weight(_text_:terminology in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07009558 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.29141995 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.030888164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030888164 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  11. Ozeki, S.: Was ist der Begriff? (1987) 0.02
    0.02478253 = product of:
      0.09913012 = sum of:
        0.09913012 = product of:
          0.19826023 = sum of:
            0.19826023 = weight(_text_:terminology in 658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19826023 = score(doc=658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.8242601 = fieldWeight in 658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology and knowledge engineering. Proc. Int. Congress an Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, 29.9.-1.10.1987, Trier. Ed: Hans Czap, Christian Galinski
  12. Sager, J.C.; Ndi-Kimbi, A.: ¬The conceptual structure of terminological definitions and their realisations : a report on research in progress (1995) 0.02
    0.024533452 = product of:
      0.09813381 = sum of:
        0.09813381 = product of:
          0.19626762 = sum of:
            0.19626762 = weight(_text_:terminology in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19626762 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.8159759 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 2(1995) no.1, S.61-81
  13. Sager, J.C.; L'Homme, M.-C.: ¬A model for the definition of concepts : rules for analytical definitions in terminological databases (1994) 0.02
    0.024533452 = product of:
      0.09813381 = sum of:
        0.09813381 = product of:
          0.19626762 = sum of:
            0.19626762 = weight(_text_:terminology in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19626762 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.8159759 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 1(1994) no.2, S.351-373
  14. Sager, J.C.: In search of a foundation : towards a theory of the term (1999) 0.02
    0.024533452 = product of:
      0.09813381 = sum of:
        0.09813381 = product of:
          0.19626762 = sum of:
            0.19626762 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19626762 = score(doc=6288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.8159759 = fieldWeight in 6288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.41-57
  15. Barona, J.L.: Sciences, language and social interaction : towards a theory of the term (1999) 0.02
    0.024533452 = product of:
      0.09813381 = sum of:
        0.09813381 = product of:
          0.19626762 = sum of:
            0.19626762 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19626762 = score(doc=6292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.8159759 = fieldWeight in 6292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.107-116
  16. Gilreath, C.T.: Merons, taxons, and qualities : a taxonomy of aspects (1995) 0.02
    0.017523894 = product of:
      0.07009558 = sum of:
        0.07009558 = product of:
          0.14019115 = sum of:
            0.14019115 = weight(_text_:terminology in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14019115 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.5828399 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Terminology. 2(1995) no.1, S.17-59
  17. Thellefsen, M.: ¬The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation (2006) 0.01
    0.014019116 = product of:
      0.056076463 = sum of:
        0.056076463 = product of:
          0.11215293 = sum of:
            0.11215293 = weight(_text_:terminology in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11215293 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.46627194 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper present an alternative approach to knowledge organization based on semiotic reasoning. The semantic distance between domain specific terminology and KOS is analyzed by means of their different sign systems. It is argued that a faceted approach may provide the means needed to minimize the gap between knowledge domains and KOS.
  18. ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013) 0.01
    0.012391265 = product of:
      0.04956506 = sum of:
        0.04956506 = product of:
          0.09913012 = sum of:
            0.09913012 = weight(_text_:terminology in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09913012 = score(doc=6070,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.41213006 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This standard provides the basic terms and their definitions in the field of information and documentation for the purpose of promoting and facilitating knowledge sharing and information exchange. This International Standard presents terms and definitions of selected concepts relevant to the field of information and documentation. If a definition is from other standards, the priority of selection is TC46 technical standards, then technical standards in relevant field, and then terminology related standards. The scope of this International Standard corresponds to that of ISO/TC46, Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. ISO 5127 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and Documentation, WG4, Terminology of information and documentation. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 5127:2001), which has been technically revised to overcome problems in the practical application of ISO 5127:2001 and to take account of the new developments in the field of information and documentation.
  19. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.010810858 = product of:
      0.04324343 = sum of:
        0.04324343 = product of:
          0.08648686 = sum of:
            0.08648686 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08648686 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  20. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.01
    0.010514337 = product of:
      0.042057347 = sum of:
        0.042057347 = product of:
          0.08411469 = sum of:
            0.08411469 = weight(_text_:terminology in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08411469 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.34970397 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.