-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.10
0.09844469 = product of:
0.19688939 = sum of:
0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11610239 = score(doc=3624,freq=12.0), product of:
0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.080786996 = sum of:
0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056076463 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.02471053 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02471053 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
-
Pettee, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information (1985)
0.07
0.07207031 = product of:
0.14414062 = sum of:
0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11610239 = score(doc=3630,freq=12.0), product of:
0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
0.028038232 = product of:
0.056076463 = sum of:
0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056076463 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
-
Pettee, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.07
0.07207031 = product of:
0.14414062 = sum of:
0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11610239 = score(doc=3633,freq=12.0), product of:
0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
0.028038232 = product of:
0.056076463 = sum of:
0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056076463 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
-
Cutter, C.A.: Subjects (1985)
0.02
0.017958673 = product of:
0.07183469 = sum of:
0.07183469 = weight(_text_:headings in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07183469 = score(doc=3625,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.3248407 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Some of the advantages of the classed catalog were then reintroduced into the alphabetical subject catalog through see also references and, to some extent, by the use of inverted headings. Although never officially acknowledged, Cutter's principles provided the philosophical underpinnings for the Library of Congress and the Sears subject headings systems. His principles of common usage, specific entry, uniform heading, and syndetic structure have been reflected in the Library of Congress Subject Headings practice and reiterated by David Judson Haykin (q.v.) in his exposition of the Library of Congress system. Cutter's definition of "specific entry" has been frequently quoted as the basis of the alphabetical subject catalog. Because Cutter's Rules are no longer in print, the following excerpt contains all the rules an subject entry from the fourth edition of Rules for a Dictionary Catalog. These rules, first published over a hundred years ago, do not address all the problems encountered in subject analysis in modern times. Nonetheless, many of his ideas are still valid and manifested in subject cataloging practice in American libraries today. Moreover, as A. C. Foskett comments, "his Rules can still be read with profit (and, more unusual in such works, pleasure) today."
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.01
0.0120697655 = product of:
0.048279062 = sum of:
0.048279062 = product of:
0.14483719 = sum of:
0.14483719 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483719 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995)
0.01
0.009266449 = product of:
0.037065797 = sum of:
0.037065797 = product of:
0.07413159 = sum of:
0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07413159 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
-
Rayward, W.B.: Visions of Xanadu : Paul Otlet (1868-1944) and hypertext (1994)
0.01
0.008761947 = product of:
0.03504779 = sum of:
0.03504779 = product of:
0.07009558 = sum of:
0.07009558 = weight(_text_:terminology in 2545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07009558 = score(doc=2545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.29141995 = fieldWeight in 2545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The work of the Belgian internationalist and documentalist, Paul Otlet (1868-1944), and his colleagues in Brussles, forms an important and neglected part of the history of information science. They developed a complex of organizations that are similar in important respects functionally to contemporary hypertext/hypermedia systems. These organizations effectively provided for the integration on bibliographic, image and textual databases. Chunks of text on cards or separate sheets were created according to 'the monographic principle' and their physical organization managed by the UDC, created by the Belgians from Melvil Dewey's DDC. This article discusses Otlet's concept of the Office of Documentation and, as examples of an approach to actual hypertext systems, several special Offices of Documentation set up in the International Office of Bibliography. In his Traité de Documentation of 1934, one of the first systematic treatises on what today we would call information science, Otlet speculated imaginatively about telecommunications, text-voice conversion, and what is needed in computer workstations, though of course he does not use this terminology. By assessing how the intellectual paradigm of 19th century positivism shaped Otlet's thinking, this study suggests how, despite its apparent contemporaneity, what he proposed was in fact conceptually different from the hypertext systems that have been developed or speculated about today. Such as analysis paradoxically also suggests the irony that a 'deconstructionist' reading of accounts of theses systems might find embedded in them the postivist approach to knowledge that the system designers would seem on the face of it explicitely to have repudiated
-
Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017)
0.01
0.008761947 = product of:
0.03504779 = sum of:
0.03504779 = product of:
0.07009558 = sum of:
0.07009558 = weight(_text_:terminology in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07009558 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.29141995 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
-
Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947)
0.01
0.0061776326 = product of:
0.02471053 = sum of:
0.02471053 = product of:
0.04942106 = sum of:
0.04942106 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04942106 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
-
Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004)
0.01
0.0061776326 = product of:
0.02471053 = sum of:
0.02471053 = product of:
0.04942106 = sum of:
0.04942106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04942106 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:33:51
-
Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015)
0.01
0.0061776326 = product of:
0.02471053 = sum of:
0.02471053 = product of:
0.04942106 = sum of:
0.04942106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04942106 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2016 15:58:46
-
Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013)
0.01
0.005405429 = product of:
0.021621715 = sum of:
0.021621715 = product of:
0.04324343 = sum of:
0.04324343 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04324343 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:10:07
-
Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012)
0.00
0.0038610206 = product of:
0.015444082 = sum of:
0.015444082 = product of:
0.030888164 = sum of:
0.030888164 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030888164 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045596033 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2016 16:06:54
