Search (104 results, page 1 of 6)

0.16897672 = product of:
  0.33795345 = sum of:
    0.08448836 = product of:
      0.2534651 = sum of:
        0.2534651 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2534651 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2534651 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2534651 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.12069766 = product of:
  0.24139532 = sum of:
    0.06034883 = product of:
      0.18104649 = sum of:
        0.18104649 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18104649 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18104649 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18104649 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

0.12069766 = product of:
  0.24139532 = sum of:
    0.06034883 = product of:
      0.18104649 = sum of:
        0.18104649 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18104649 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18104649 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18104649 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045596033 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.021246593 = product of:
  0.084986374 = sum of:
    0.084986374 = product of:
      0.16997275 = sum of:
        0.16997275 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16997275 = score(doc=3037,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.70665586 = fieldWeight in 3037, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In view of the increasing interdependence of Information and Documentation on the one hand and terminology work on the other, the author analyzes the relationship between information science and terminology science starting with the concept of 'information' itself. From the semantic conception of information the concept of specialized information is derived which can be directly used in terminology science, where this type of information should be the starting point of any investigation or theoretical consideration. A terminological view of information and knowledge management would be a practical example

0.020196749 = product of:
  0.080786996 = sum of:
    0.080786996 = sum of:
      0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056076463 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045596033 = queryNorm
          0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
      0.02471053 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02471053 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045596033 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.

Date

2. 1.2005 18:22:25

0.017472984 = product of:
  0.06989194 = sum of:
    0.06989194 = product of:
      0.13978387 = sum of:
        0.13978387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13978387 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:01:22

0.015176138 = product of:
  0.06070455 = sum of:
    0.06070455 = product of:
      0.1214091 = sum of:
        0.1214091 = weight(_text_:terminology in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1214091 = score(doc=706,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.5047542 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

At the heart of any discussion of the information sciences, at least when this discussion is held in the English language, lies the problem of the variant, and shifting, set of concepts and meanings of the terms 'library' and 'information'. The term 'information', in particular, has a variety of meanings in different contexts and communities of discourse, providing an excellent example of Wittgenstein's language game. This implies that any terminology built around this central concept is in danger of being constructed on 'shifting sands'. This article outlines, for the English language only, some of these diverse meanings of information, and their consequences for the terminology of the information sciences. It focuses on the variant relationships between information and related concepts, particularly data and knowledge. It also includes an account of the view information taken in the hard and soft methodologies of system science, as well as the new discipline of 'information physics'. From this, some remarks may be made on the changing meanings of the complex terms such as 'information technology' and 'information literacy', as well as those complex terms involving 'management', information management, knowledge management, document management etc. A similar, though shorter, treatment will de given to terminology around the 'library' concept, particularly in view of the change toward viewing a library as an organised virtual information space, rather than physical environment.

0.013104739 = product of:
  0.052418955 = sum of:
    0.052418955 = product of:
      0.10483791 = sum of:
        0.10483791 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10483791 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22
22. 7.2000 19:05:41

0.012622967 = product of:
  0.05049187 = sum of:
    0.05049187 = sum of:
      0.03504779 = weight(_text_:terminology in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03504779 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045596033 = queryNorm
          0.14570998 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.015444082 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015444082 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045596033 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

"This letter considers some main arguments in Professor Bates' article (2008), which is part of our former debate (Bates, 2005,2006; Hjoerland, 2007). Bates (2008) does not write much to restate or enlarge on her theoretical position but is mostly arguing about what she claims Hjorland (2007) ignored or misinterpreted in her two articles. Bates (2008, p. 842) wrote that my arguments did not reflect "a standard of coherence, consistency, and logic that is expected of an argument presented in a scientific journal." My argumentation below will refute this statement. This controversy is whether information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon (alone), as an objective phenomenon (alone), or as a combined objective and a subjective phenomenon ("having it both ways"). Bates (2006) defined "information" (sometimes, e.g., termed "information 1," p. 1042) as an objective phenomenon and "information 2" as a subjective phenomenon. However, sometimes the term "information" is also used as a synonym for "information 2," e.g., "the term information is understood to refer to one or both senses" (p. 1042). Thus, Professor Bates is not consistent in using the terminology that she herself introduces, and confusion in this controversy may be caused by Professor Bates' ambiguity in her use of the term "information." Bates (2006, p. 1033) defined information as an objective phenomenon by joining a definition by Edwin Parker: "Information is the pattern of organization of matter and energy." The argument in Hjoerland (2007) is, by contrast, that information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon all the way down: That neither the objective definition of information nor "having it both ways" is fruitful. This is expressed, for example, by joining Karpatschof's (2000) definition of information as a physical signal relative to a certain release mechanism, which implies that information is not something objective that can be understood independently of an observer or independently of other kinds of mechanism that are programmed to be sensitive to specific attributes of a signal: There are many differences in the world, and each of them is potentially informative in given situations. Regarding Parker's definition, "patterns of organization of matter and energy" are no more than that until they inform somebody about something. When they inform somebody about something, they may be considered information. The following quote is part of the argumentation in Bates (2008): "He contrasts my definition of information as 'observer-independent' with his position that information is 'situational' and adds a list of respected names on the situational side (Hjoerland, 2007, p. 1448). What this sentence, and much of the remainder of his argument, ignores is the fact that my approach accounts for both an observer-independent and a contextual, situational sense of information." Yes, it is correct that I mostly concentrated on refuting Bates' objective definition of information. It is as if Bates expects an overall appraisal of her work rather than providing a specific analysis of the points on which there are disagreements. I see Bates' "having it both ways": a symptom of inconsistence in argumentation.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:13:27

0.012355265 = product of:
  0.04942106 = sum of:
    0.04942106 = product of:
      0.09884212 = sum of:
        0.09884212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09884212 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164

0.012355265 = product of:
  0.04942106 = sum of:
    0.04942106 = product of:
      0.09884212 = sum of:
        0.09884212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09884212 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 19:22:28

0.010920615 = product of:
  0.04368246 = sum of:
    0.04368246 = product of:
      0.08736492 = sum of:
        0.08736492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08736492 = score(doc=1408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Sozialphilosoph Hermann Lübbe ist überzeugt davon, daß die Massenmedien nicht 'vermassend', sondern vielmehr 'pluralistisch' wirken. - Bericht zu den 22. Frankfurter Römerberggesprächen zum Thema: Kommt eine neue Kultur? Auf der Suche nach Wirklichkeit im Medienzeitalter

0.010920615 = product of:
  0.04368246 = sum of:
    0.04368246 = product of:
      0.08736492 = sum of:
        0.08736492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08736492 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05

0.010810858 = product of:
  0.04324343 = sum of:
    0.04324343 = product of:
      0.08648686 = sum of:
        0.08648686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08648686 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:23:03

0.010810858 = product of:
  0.04324343 = sum of:
    0.04324343 = product of:
      0.08648686 = sum of:
        0.08648686 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08648686 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383

0.010810858 = product of:
  0.04324343 = sum of:
    0.04324343 = product of:
      0.08648686 = sum of:
        0.08648686 = weight(_text_:22 in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08648686 = score(doc=4496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:05:18

0.010699974 = product of:
  0.042799897 = sum of:
    0.042799897 = product of:
      0.085599795 = sum of:
        0.085599795 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085599795 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13

0.009266449 = product of:
  0.037065797 = sum of:
    0.037065797 = product of:
      0.07413159 = sum of:
        0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 5361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07413159 = score(doc=5361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5361)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:45:33

0.009266449 = product of:
  0.037065797 = sum of:
    0.037065797 = product of:
      0.07413159 = sum of:
        0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 6026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07413159 = score(doc=6026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

5. 1.1997 9:39:22

0.009266449 = product of:
  0.037065797 = sum of:
    0.037065797 = product of:
      0.07413159 = sum of:
        0.07413159 = weight(_text_:22 in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07413159 = score(doc=4231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:05:31