Search (269 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.12069766 = product of:
      0.24139532 = sum of:
        0.06034883 = product of:
          0.18104649 = sum of:
            0.18104649 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18104649 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18104649 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18104649 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3865637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  2. Gödert, W.: Subject headings for mathematical literature (1980) 0.11
    0.11013503 = product of:
      0.22027005 = sum of:
        0.16419359 = weight(_text_:headings in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16419359 = score(doc=4660,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.74249303 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.056076463 = product of:
          0.11215293 = sum of:
            0.11215293 = weight(_text_:terminology in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11215293 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.46627194 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses mathematical terminology to give practical hints for assigning subject headings to a book and proposes a method to use for subject analysis. The method is based on connections between the subject-classification scheme of the American Mathematical Society and indexing with subject headings. Gives examples and compares them with LCSH and PRECIS. A thesaurus of mathematics, using PRECIS methods and connecting with the Amercian Mathematical Society classification is desirable. Authors could also classify their own work and the data could be printed with the books
  3. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.10
    0.09844469 = product of:
      0.19688939 = sum of:
        0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11610239 = score(doc=3624,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
        0.080786996 = sum of:
          0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056076463 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.02471053 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02471053 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  4. Miller, J.: From subject headings for audiovisual media (1988) 0.10
    0.09613919 = product of:
      0.19227839 = sum of:
        0.0710979 = weight(_text_:headings in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0710979 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
        0.12118049 = sum of:
          0.08411469 = weight(_text_:terminology in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08411469 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.34970397 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
          0.037065797 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037065797 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045596033 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In subject cataloging of audiovisual materials generic terms like 'documentary' or 'absolute film' facilitate the work of users and librarians. On the concrete level the study shows 4 ways to make a list of generic terms for the application in general libraries. The heuristic function of the study is to offer methods towards the solution of problems in the field of subject cataloguing of non-book materials. (1) The formal subject heading in library science corresponds to generic terms; Anglo-American and German rules for subject cataloging, however, provide no list that is directly applicable. (2) The terminology of institutions administering many audiovisual documents has been examined; general libraries have to find a common denominator with medium depth of classification and balanced representation of fiction and nonfiction terms. (3) From encyclopedic definitions of generic terms 8 dimensions have been extracted characterizing the terms in question individually. (4) The contribution of communication science has been discussed explaining a research project
    Source
    Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.08
    0.07938702 = product of:
      0.15877403 = sum of:
        0.1340635 = weight(_text_:headings in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1340635 = score(doc=217,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.606243 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
        0.02471053 = product of:
          0.04942106 = sum of:
            0.04942106 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04942106 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51
    LCSH
    Subject headings
    Subject
    Subject headings
  6. Pettee, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information (1985) 0.07
    0.07207031 = product of:
      0.14414062 = sum of:
        0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11610239 = score(doc=3630,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
        0.028038232 = product of:
          0.056076463 = sum of:
            0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056076463 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
  7. Pettee, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.07
    0.07207031 = product of:
      0.14414062 = sum of:
        0.11610239 = weight(_text_:headings in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11610239 = score(doc=3633,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.52502185 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
        0.028038232 = product of:
          0.056076463 = sum of:
            0.056076463 = weight(_text_:terminology in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056076463 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.23313597 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
  8. Dailey, J.E.: Subject headings (1980) 0.07
    0.07183469 = product of:
      0.28733876 = sum of:
        0.28733876 = weight(_text_:headings in 7602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28733876 = score(doc=7602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.2993628 = fieldWeight in 7602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7602)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Enthält Geschichte der Library of Congress Subject Headings und Sears' list
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
  9. Subject and information analysis (1985) 0.07
    0.07130248 = product of:
      0.14260496 = sum of:
        0.10054762 = weight(_text_:headings in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10054762 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.45468226 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
        0.042057347 = product of:
          0.08411469 = sum of:
            0.08411469 = weight(_text_:terminology in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08411469 = score(doc=793,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.34970397 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: OVERVIEW: Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS); Analysis of Information (B.C. VICKERY) / DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING: Descriptive cataloging (J.E. DAILY) / NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXT PROCESSING: Content analysis (C.E. HICKS, J.E. RUSH, S.M. STRONG); Machine translation (W. LEHMANN); Machine translation (W.N. LOCKE); Natural language analysis and processing (N. SAGER); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / INDEXING: Coordinate indexing (A. ARTANDI); Subject indexes (C.L. BERNIER); Automatic indexing: progress and prospects (B.C. LANDRY, J.E. RUSH); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / TERMINOLOGY CONTROL: Authority files (J.E. DAILY); Subject headings (J.E. Daily); Thesaurus (D.J. FOSKETT); Subject headings (M.L. MANNHEIMER) / CLASSIFYING: Abstract classification (J.E. Daily); Classification and categorization (J.E. DAILY); Clumps, theory of (K. SPARCK JONES); Dewey Decimal Classification (M.L. MANNHEIMER); Techniques used in Library of Congress Classification (M.L. MANNHEIMER); Classification, theory of (A. NEELAMEGHAN); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / ABSTRACTING: Abstracts and abstracting (C.L. BERNIER); Abstracting (B.A. MATHIS, J.E. RUSH) / EXTRACTING: Relevance predictability in information retrieval systems (A. KENT, J. BELZER, M. KURFEERST, E.D. DYM, D.L. SHIREY, A. BOSE)
  10. Holley, R.P.; Killheffer, R.E.: Is there an answer to the subject access crisis? (1981) 0.07
    0.07130248 = product of:
      0.14260496 = sum of:
        0.10054762 = weight(_text_:headings in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10054762 = score(doc=5531,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.45468226 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
        0.042057347 = product of:
          0.08411469 = sum of:
            0.08411469 = weight(_text_:terminology in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08411469 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24053115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.34970397 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2752647 = idf(docFreq=614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress subject heading policy has been frequently criticized for using obsolete and biased terminology, for not providing subject analysis in depth, and for being overly research library oriented. While both PRECIS and the Subject Analysis Project offer possible solutions, fiscal considerations make their adoptions unlikely. By using existing computer technology, individual libraries could improve subject access by improved subject searching capabilities and by implementations of subject authority files which could tailor LC subject headings to the individual libraries' needs and provide an individualized cross-reference structure. For its part, the Library of Congress should provide an uptatable machine readable file of its complete cross-reference structure. This file should contain all references used in the Library of Congress Public Catalog since much of LC's subject heading practice is based upon its cross-reference structure. With such improvements, LC subject headings could provide much better subject access at an acceptable cost
  11. Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985) 0.07
    0.06946363 = product of:
      0.13892727 = sum of:
        0.117305554 = weight(_text_:headings in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117305554 = score(doc=363,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
        0.021621715 = product of:
          0.04324343 = sum of:
            0.04324343 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04324343 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although the rules for descriptive cataloging have been recodified twice in the past twenty years, there never has been any kind of comprehensive theoretical code for subject headings, despite some suggestions for a code over the years. This essay explains the need for a code, provides historical background, and presents some broad proposals as to the philosophy, structure, and form of the code and what the code should cover. Included is the relation between the proposed code and the Library of Congress' 1984 Subject Cataloging Manual.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:01
  12. Schadlich, T.: Changing from Sears to LC Subject Headings (1980) 0.07
    0.06703175 = product of:
      0.268127 = sum of:
        0.268127 = weight(_text_:headings in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.268127 = score(doc=2793,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.212486 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
  13. Studwell, W.E.: Retrieving LC Subject Headings : long chains versus an increased number of headings (1989) 0.07
    0.06703175 = product of:
      0.268127 = sum of:
        0.268127 = weight(_text_:headings in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.268127 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.212486 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.06
    0.059540257 = product of:
      0.11908051 = sum of:
        0.10054762 = weight(_text_:headings in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10054762 = score(doc=1637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.45468226 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
        0.018532898 = product of:
          0.037065797 = sum of:
            0.037065797 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037065797 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
  15. Scharmann, U.: Anwendung der Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) in öffentlichen Bibliotheken. Abschlußbericht zum dbi-Projekt 11.35 (1989) 0.06
    0.059540257 = product of:
      0.11908051 = sum of:
        0.10054762 = weight(_text_:headings in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10054762 = score(doc=203,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.45468226 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
        0.018532898 = product of:
          0.037065797 = sum of:
            0.037065797 = weight(_text_:22 in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037065797 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966953 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045596033 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 12:07:51
    LCSH
    Subject headings, German
    Subject
    Subject headings, German
  16. ¬A list of Australian subject headings (1981) 0.06
    0.059248257 = product of:
      0.23699303 = sum of:
        0.23699303 = weight(_text_:headings in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23699303 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.0716964 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Thesaurus of information technology terms (1988) 0.06
    0.059248257 = product of:
      0.23699303 = sum of:
        0.23699303 = weight(_text_:headings in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23699303 = score(doc=936,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.0716964 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Information technology
    Subject headings / Electronic data processing
    Subject
    Subject headings / Information technology
    Subject headings / Electronic data processing
  18. Greenberg, A.M.: Scope notes in Library of Congress Subject Headings (1981) 0.06
    0.058051195 = product of:
      0.23220478 = sum of:
        0.23220478 = weight(_text_:headings in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23220478 = score(doc=275,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            1.0500437 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scope notes from Library of Congress Subject Headings are examined for 1) adherence to principles enunciated in the introduction to the list; 2) peculiarities of subject headings associated with such notes; 3) the structure of the notes; and 4) typical patterns associated with certain categories of subject headings. Scope notes are shown to enable catalogers to apply subject headings consistently and readers to distinguish related headings knowledgeably.
  19. Wepsiec, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings pertaining to society (1982) 0.05
    0.0507948 = product of:
      0.2031792 = sum of:
        0.2031792 = weight(_text_:headings in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2031792 = score(doc=281,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.91878825 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Seven clusters of headings on three levels of generalization, listed in Library of Congress Subject Headings, 9th edition, representing types of concepts pertaining to the study of society, society itself, and its various types of social units, are analyzed for their hierarchical relationships. Eighty-three headings in the clusters Sociology and Family are found to be overrelated, while 112 headings are underrelated in Social structure. Community, Social institutions. Age groups and social classes. Suggestions are offered for restructuring some hierarchical relationships, and the need for the development of a comprehensive code for establishing headings is emphasized.
  20. Library of Congress response to Library of Congress Subject Headings "Is Euthanasia the Answer?" (1987) 0.05
    0.05027381 = product of:
      0.20109524 = sum of:
        0.20109524 = weight(_text_:headings in 523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20109524 = score(doc=523,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22113821 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045596033 = queryNorm
            0.9093645 = fieldWeight in 523, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=523)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Antwort auf: Henige, D.: Library of Congress Subject Headings: is euthanasia the answer?

Languages

  • e 215
  • d 45
  • m 3
  • nl 3
  • f 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 214
  • m 36
  • s 12
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications