Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%22Text retrieval conference%22 5
lcshs%3a%22Text retrieval conference%22 5

Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.04

0.04035003 = product of:
  0.060525045 = sum of:
    0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03624057 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051211275 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
    0.024284473 = product of:
      0.048568945 = sum of:
        0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048568945 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract: Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.04

0.03517163 = product of:
  0.10551489 = sum of:
    0.10551489 = sum of:
      0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056945946 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211275 = queryNorm
          0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
      0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048568945 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211275 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Object: DDC-22
Source: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

Beall, J.: Approaches to expansions : case studies from the German and Vietnamese translations (2003) 0.03

0.025122594 = product of:
  0.07536778 = sum of:
    0.07536778 = sum of:
      0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040675674 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211275 = queryNorm
          0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
      0.034692105 = weight(_text_:22 in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034692105 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051211275 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content: Vortrag während der 69. IFLA General conference and Council, 1.-9.8.2003 in Berlin; deutsche Fassung unter: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/123g trans-Beall.pdf
Object: DDC-22

Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.01
```
0.014643403 = product of:
  0.043930206 = sum of:
    0.043930206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043930206 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051211275 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Typographical errors can block access to records in online catalogs; but, when a word contains a typo and is also spelled correctly elsewhere in the same record, access may not be blocked. To quantify the effect of typographical errors in records on information retrieval, we conducted a study to measure the proportion of records that contain a typographical error but that do not also contain a correct spelling of the same word. This article presents the experimental design, results of the study, and a statistical analysis of the results.We find that the average proportion of records that are blocked by the presence of a typo (that is, records in which a correct spelling of the word does not also occur) ranges from 35% to 99%, depending upon the frequency of the word being searched and the likelihood of the word being misspelled.

Beall, J.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Finding fiction : facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format (2006) 0.01

0.009490991 = product of:
  0.028472973 = sum of:
    0.028472973 = product of:
      0.056945946 = sum of:
        0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 2235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056945946 = score(doc=2235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 2235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2235)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Types

Themes