-
Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996)
0.05
0.04930556 = product of:
0.07395834 = sum of:
0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041417796 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
0.032540537 = product of:
0.065081075 = sum of:
0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065081075 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
-
Hudon, M.; Turner, J.M.; Devin, Y.: How many terms are enough? : stability and dynamism in vocabulary management for moving image collections (2000)
0.04
0.037964225 = product of:
0.056946337 = sum of:
0.036608502 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036608502 = score(doc=117,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
0.020337837 = product of:
0.040675674 = sum of:
0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040675674 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Most moving image collections have existed for less than a century, and as we enter the new millennium we observe that the organisation of these collections is still characterized by ad hoc practices. An important stream of research in this area focuses on high-level access to images using methods from library and information science, and using text to create information useful for retrieval. It has been established that common names for objects seen in the image are the key to retrieval in such collections. On a day-to-day basis, those responsible for collection management build indexing vocabularies, creating terms as necessary, and often structuring them loosely into a thesaurus. Discussions with moving image collection librarians have led us to believe that there may be an optimal number of common names a thesaurus for managing general collections of moving images should contain, and that the terms may even be the same from one thesaurus to the next. In this paper, we describe the methodology adopted for studying this question, and report preliminary results
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014)
0.03
0.030147111 = product of:
0.09044133 = sum of:
0.09044133 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
0.041630525 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041630525 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Green, R.; Bean, C.A.; Hudon, M.: Universality and basic level concepts (2003)
0.02
0.02465278 = product of:
0.03697917 = sum of:
0.020708898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020708898 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
0.016270269 = product of:
0.032540537 = sum of:
0.032540537 = weight(_text_:conference in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032540537 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.1675761 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines whether a concept's hierarchical level affects the likelihood of its universality across schemes for knowledge representation and knowledge organization. Empirical data an equivalents are drawn from a bilingual thesaurus, a pair of biomedical vocabularies, and two ontologies. Conceptual equivalence across resources occurs significantly more often at the basic level than at subordinate or superordinate levels. Attempts to integrate knowledge representation or knowledge organization tools should concentrate an establishing equivalences at the basic level. 1. Rationale The degree of success attainable in the integration of multiple knowledge representation systems or knowledge organization schemes is constrained by limitations an the universality of human conceptual systems. For example, human languages do not all lexicalize the same set of concepts; nor do they structure (quasi-)equivalent concepts in the same relational patterns (Riesthuis, 2001). As a consequence, even multilingual thesauri designed from the outset from the perspective of multiple languages may routinely include situations where corresponding terms are not truly equivalent (Hudon, 1997, 2001). Intuitively, where inexactness and partialness in equivalence mappings across knowledge representation schemes and knowledge organizations schemes exist, a more difficult retrieval scenario arises than where equivalence mappings reflect full and exact conceptual matches. The question we address in this paper is whether a concept's hierarchical level af ects the likelihood of its universality/full equivalence across schemes for knowledge representation and knowledge organization. Cognitive science research has shown that one particular hierarchical level-called the basic level--enjoys a privileged status (Brown, 1958; Rosch et al., 1976). Our underlying hypothesis is that concepts at the basic level (e.g., apple, shoe, chair) are more likely to match across knowledge representation schemes and knowledge organization schemes than concepts at the superordinate (e.g., fruit, footwear, furniture) or subordinate (e.g., Granny Smith, sneaker, recliner) levels. This hypothesis is consistent with ethnobiological data showing that folk classifications of flora are more likely to agree at the basic level than at superordinate or subordinate levels (Berlin, 1992).
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Hudon, M.: Expanding audiences for education-related information and resources : classificatory structures (2003)
0.01
0.014643403 = product of:
0.043930206 = sum of:
0.043930206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043930206 = score(doc=5521,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Education is a culturally and politically branded domain of knowledge and practice, and education specialists have traditionally remained somewhat isolated, communicating mainly on the general level of "basic educational principles." The expansion of the World Wide Web could change this situation; there exist on the Web a substantial number of education-related resources which have become accessible to international audiences. In this paper, the authors look at how these resources are organized with a view to answering two questions: (1) In a context of global exchanges, are education-related resources available on the Web organized in such a way as to maximize efficiency of identification and retrieval? (2) In virtual libraries with specialized collections on education, do categorization schemes and terminology reflect anything other than local perspectives and systems?
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
-
Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education (2003)
0.01
0.013805932 = product of:
0.041417796 = sum of:
0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041417796 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hudon, M.: Facet (2020)
0.01
0.012080191 = product of:
0.03624057 = sum of:
0.03624057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03624057 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- S.R. Ranganathan is credited with the introduction of the term "facet" in the field of knowledge organization towards the middle of the twentieth century. Facets have traditionally been used to organize document collections and to express complex subjects. In the digital world, they act as filters to facilitate navigation and improve retrieval. But the popularity of the term does not mean that a definitive characterization of the concept has been established. Indeed, several conceptualizations of the facet co-exist. This article provides an overview of formal and informal definitions found in the literature of knowledge organization, followed by a discussion of four common conceptualizations of the facet: process vs product, nature vs function, object vs subject and organization vs navigation.
-
Hudon, M.; Fortier, A.: Facet : itself a multifaceted concept (2018)
0.01
0.010846846 = product of:
0.032540537 = sum of:
0.032540537 = product of:
0.065081075 = sum of:
0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 4741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065081075 = score(doc=4741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 4741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998)
0.01
0.008135135 = product of:
0.024405405 = sum of:
0.024405405 = product of:
0.04881081 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Hudon, M.: Innovation and tradition in knowledge organization schemes on the Internet, or, Finding one's way in the virtual library (2000)
0.01
0.008135135 = product of:
0.024405405 = sum of:
0.024405405 = product of:
0.04881081 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.01
0.008135135 = product of:
0.024405405 = sum of:
0.024405405 = product of:
0.04881081 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hudon, M.; Mas, E.S.: Structure, logic, and semantics for Web-based collections in education (2006)
0.01
0.008135135 = product of:
0.024405405 = sum of:
0.024405405 = product of:
0.04881081 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 4391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=4391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 4391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
