Search (98 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.11
    0.10800417 = product of:
      0.16200624 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
        0.120588444 = sum of:
          0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065081075 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.05550737 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05550737 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  2. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.06
    0.061631948 = product of:
      0.09244792 = sum of:
        0.051772244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051772244 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
        0.040675674 = product of:
          0.08135135 = sum of:
            0.08135135 = weight(_text_:conference in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08135135 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.41894025 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Postlkethwaite, B.: LITA MARC Holdings Interest Group, American Library Association Conference, new Orleans, June 1993 (1994) 0.05
    0.04930556 = product of:
      0.07395834 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
        0.032540537 = product of:
          0.065081075 = sum of:
            0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065081075 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses standards related to the USMARC holdings format. Considers issues of concern surrounding the following standards: Z39.71, the proposed standard for holdings statements for bibliographic items; Z39.50, the standard for intersystem search and retrieval; and X12, the national standard for the transmission of business data. Aslo discusses the relationship between EDI and the USMARC holdings format. Work is currently in progress to update the holdings format
  4. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.04
    0.041877605 = product of:
      0.12563281 = sum of:
        0.12563281 = sum of:
          0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056945946 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.068686865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068686865 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  5. Martin, P.: Conventions and notations for knowledge representation and retrieval (2000) 0.04
    0.03697917 = product of:
      0.055468753 = sum of:
        0.031063346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031063346 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
        0.024405405 = product of:
          0.04881081 = sum of:
            0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04881081 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  6. Taylor, M.; Dickmeiss, A.: Delivering MARC/XML records from the Library of Congress catalogue using the open protocols SRW/U and Z39.50 (2005) 0.04
    0.03697917 = product of:
      0.055468753 = sum of:
        0.031063346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031063346 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.024405405 = product of:
          0.04881081 = sum of:
            0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04881081 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The MARC standard for representing catalogue records and the Z39.50 standard for locating and retrieving them have facilitated interoperability in the library domain for more than a decade. With the increasing ubiquity of XML, these standards are being superseded by MARCXML and MarcXchange for record representation and SRW/U for searching and retrieval. Service providers moving from the older standards to the newer generally need to support both old and new forms during the transition period. YAZ Proxy uses a novel approach to provide SRW/MARCXML access to the Library of Congress catalogue, by translating requests into Z39.50 and querying the older system directly. As a fringe benefit, it also greatly accelerates Z39.50 access.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  7. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.04
    0.03517163 = product of:
      0.10551489 = sum of:
        0.10551489 = sum of:
          0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056945946 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
          0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048568945 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  8. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.04
    0.03517163 = product of:
      0.10551489 = sum of:
        0.10551489 = sum of:
          0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056945946 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.048568945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048568945 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  9. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=4421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.03
    0.025122594 = product of:
      0.07536778 = sum of:
        0.07536778 = sum of:
          0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040675674 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.034692105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034692105 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  11. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.02
    0.020708898 = product of:
      0.062126692 = sum of:
        0.062126692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062126692 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  12. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02
    0.01962482 = product of:
      0.058874458 = sum of:
        0.058874458 = product of:
          0.117748916 = sum of:
            0.117748916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117748916 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.018502457 = product of:
      0.05550737 = sum of:
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.02
    0.017257415 = product of:
      0.051772244 = sum of:
        0.051772244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051772244 = score(doc=3033,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
  15. ISO 8459: Bibliographic data element directory : Pt.1: Interloan applications (ISO 8459-1:1988). - Pt.2: Acquisition applications (ISO 8459-2:1992). - Pt.3: Information retrieval applications (ISO 8459-3:1994). - Pt.4: Circulation applications (ISO/CD 8459-4:1996) - Pt.5: Data elements for the exchange of cataloguing and metadata (ISO/DIS 8459-5:2000) (1988-) 0.02
    0.017257415 = product of:
      0.051772244 = sum of:
        0.051772244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051772244 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Kernernman, V.Y.; Koenig, M.E.D.: USMARC as a standardized format for the Internet hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery system design (1996) 0.02
    0.017083969 = product of:
      0.051251903 = sum of:
        0.051251903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051251903 = score(doc=5565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys how the USMARC integrated bibliographic format (UBIF) could be mapped onto an hypermedia document USMARC format (HDUF) to meet the requirements of a hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery (HDRD) system for the Internet. Explores the characteristics of such a system using an example of the WWW's directory and searching engine Yahoo!. Discusses additional standard specifications for the UBIF's structure, content designation, and data content to map this format into the HDUF that can serve as a proxy for the Net HDRD system
  17. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.02
    0.017083969 = product of:
      0.051251903 = sum of:
        0.051251903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051251903 = score(doc=7679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
  18. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.01618965 = product of:
      0.048568945 = sum of:
        0.048568945 = product of:
          0.09713789 = sum of:
            0.09713789 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09713789 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  19. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.01618965 = product of:
      0.048568945 = sum of:
        0.048568945 = product of:
          0.09713789 = sum of:
            0.09713789 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09713789 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  20. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.01618965 = product of:
      0.048568945 = sum of:
        0.048568945 = product of:
          0.09713789 = sum of:
            0.09713789 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09713789 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 76
  • d 18
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • s 5
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • n 2
  • l 1
  • More… Less…