Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.09
    0.09222864 = product of:
      0.13834296 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  2. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.09
    0.09222864 = product of:
      0.13834296 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  3. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.09
    0.09222864 = product of:
      0.13834296 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
        0.05550737 = product of:
          0.11101474 = sum of:
            0.11101474 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11101474 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  4. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.05
    0.04611432 = product of:
      0.06917148 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
        0.027753685 = product of:
          0.05550737 = sum of:
            0.05550737 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05550737 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  5. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.05
    0.04611432 = product of:
      0.06917148 = sum of:
        0.041417796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041417796 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
        0.027753685 = product of:
          0.05550737 = sum of:
            0.05550737 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05550737 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
  6. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.04
    0.041847005 = product of:
      0.12554102 = sum of:
        0.12554102 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12554102 = score(doc=3826,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994) 0.04
    0.04019615 = product of:
      0.120588444 = sum of:
        0.120588444 = sum of:
          0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065081075 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
          0.05550737 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05550737 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051211275 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An annotated bibliography on hypermedia divided into 3 sections: material on hypertext/hypermedia that is not tied to any hardware platforms or operating systems; materials detailing those hypertext/hypermedia applications for DOS and Windows, HyperCard Macintosh hypertext/hypermedia applications. Includes journal articles, monographs, conference proceedings, and specific product announcements, evaluations, and reviews from 1990 until the summer of 1993
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
  8. Case, D.O.: Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2002) 0.03
    0.03349825 = product of:
      0.050247375 = sum of:
        0.038044672 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038044672 = score(doc=1270,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.24559249 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
        0.012202702 = product of:
          0.024405405 = sum of:
            0.024405405 = weight(_text_:conference in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024405405 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.12568209 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Harter, S.P.; Hert, C.A.: Evaluation of information retrieval systems : approaches, issues, and methods (1997) 0.03
    0.029590301 = product of:
      0.0887709 = sum of:
        0.0887709 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0887709 = score(doc=2264,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5730491 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of information retrieval systems, defined as systems retrieving documents a sopposed to numerical data. Explains the classic Cranfield studies that have served as a standard for retrieval testing since the 1960s and discusses the Cranfield model and its relevance based measures of retrieval effectiveness. Details sosme of the problems with the Cranfield instruments and issues of validity and reliability, generalizability, usefulness and basic concepts. Discusses the evaluation of the Internet search engines in light of the Cranfield model, noting the very real differences between batch systems (Cranfield) and interactive systems (Internet). Because the Internet collection is not fixed, it is impossible to determine recall as a measure of retrieval effectiveness. considers future directions in evaluating information retrieval systems
  10. Bookstein, A.: Probability and Fuzzy-set applications to information retrieval (1985) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=781)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Daniels, P.J.: Cognitive models in information retrieval : an evaluative review (1986) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Ruthven, R.: Interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Foster, J.: Collaborative information seeking and retrieval (2006) 0.03
    0.027611865 = product of:
      0.08283559 = sum of:
        0.08283559 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08283559 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Kantor, P.B.: Information retrieval techniques (1994) 0.03
    0.025363116 = product of:
      0.076089345 = sum of:
        0.076089345 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076089345 = score(doc=1056,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 1056, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1056)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of information retrieval techniques viewed in terms of the growing effort to implement concept based retrieval in content based algorithms. Identifies trends in the automation of indexing, retrieval, and the interaction between systems and users. Identifies 3 central issues: ways in which systems describe documents for purposes of information retrieval; ways in which systems compute the degree of match between a given document and the current state of the query; amd what the systems do with the information that they obtain from the users. Looks at information retrieval techniques in terms of: location, navigation; indexing; documents; queries; structures; concepts; matching documents to queries; restoring query structure; algorithms and content versus concepts; formulation of concepts in terms of contents; formulation of concepts with the assistance of the users; complex system codes versus underlying principles; and system evaluation
  15. Blair, D.C.: Information retrieval and the philosophy of language (2002) 0.02
    0.024888998 = product of:
      0.07466699 = sum of:
        0.07466699 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07466699 = score(doc=4283,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.48200315 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval - the retrieval, primarily, of documents or textual material - is fundamentally a linguistic process. At the very least we must describe what we want and match that description with descriptions of the information that is available to us. Furthermore, when we describe what we want, we must mean something by that description. This is a deceptively simple act, but such linguistic events have been the grist for philosophical analysis since Aristotle. Although there are complexities involved in referring to authors, document types, or other categories of information retrieval context, here I wish to focus an one of the most problematic activities in information retrieval: the description of the intellectual content of information items. And even though I take information retrieval to involve the description and retrieval of written text, what I say here is applicable to any information item whose intellectual content can be described for retrieval-books, documents, images, audio clips, video clips, scientific specimens, engineering schematics, and so forth. For convenience, though, I will refer only to the description and retrieval of documents. The description of intellectual content can go wrong in many obvious ways. We may describe what we want incorrectly; we may describe it correctly but in such general terms that its description is useless for retrieval; or we may describe what we want correctly, but misinterpret the descriptions of available information, and thereby match our description of what we want incorrectly. From a linguistic point of view, we can be misunderstood in the process of retrieval in many ways. Because the philosophy of language deals specifically with how we are understood and mis-understood, it should have some use for understanding the process of description in information retrieval. First, however, let us examine more closely the kinds of misunderstandings that can occur in information retrieval. We use language in searching for information in two principal ways. We use it to describe what we want and to discriminate what we want from other information that is available to us but that we do not want. Description and discrimination together articulate the goals of the information search process; they also delineate the two principal ways in which language can fail us in this process. Van Rijsbergen (1979) was the first to make this distinction, calling them "representation" and "discrimination.""
  16. Fox, E.A.; Urs, S.R.: Digital libraries (2002) 0.02
    0.02465278 = product of:
      0.03697917 = sum of:
        0.020708898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020708898 = score(doc=4299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
        0.016270269 = product of:
          0.032540537 = sum of:
            0.032540537 = weight(_text_:conference in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032540537 = score(doc=4299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.1675761 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of digital libraries (DLs), at the interface of library and information science with computer and communication technologies, helped to expand significantly the literature in all of these areas during the late 1990s. The pace of development is reflected by the number of special issues of major journals in information science and computer science, and the increasing number of workshops and conferences an digital libraries. For example, starting in 1995, the Communications of the ACM has devoted three special issues to the topic (Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, & Leggett, 1995; Fox & Marchionini, 1998, 2001). The Journal of the American Society for Information Science devoted two issues to digital libraries (H. Chen, 2000; Fox & Lunin, 1993); Information Processing & Management and the Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation each had one special issue (Chen & Fox, 1996; Marchionini & Fox, 1999). The domain of digital libraries, though still evolving, has matured over the last decade, as demonstrated by coverage through D-Lib (http://www.dlib.org), the International Journal an Digital Libraries (http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00799), and two overview works (W Y Arms, 2000; Lesk, 1997; both of which have also served as textbooks). Sun Microsystems published a small book to guide those planning a digital library (Noerr, 2000), and IBM has been developing commercial products for digital libraries since 1994 (IBM, 2000). A number of Web sites have extensive sets of pointers to information an DLs (D-Lib Forum, 2001; Fox, 1998a; Habing, 1998; Hein, 2000; Schwartz, 2001a, 2001b). Further, the field has attracted the attention of diverse academics, research groups, and practitionersmany of whom have attended tutorials, workshops, or conferences, e.g., the Joint Conference an Digital Libraries, which is a sequel to a separate series run by ACM and IEEE-CS. Therefore, it is timely that ARIST publishes this first review focusing specifically an digital libraries. There has been no ARIST chapter to date directly dealing with the area of DLs, though some related domains have been covered-particularly: information retrieval, user interfaces (Marchionini & Komlodi, 1998), social informatics of DLs (Bishop & Star, 1996), and scholarly communication (see Borgman and Furner's chapter in this volume). This chapter provides an overview of the diverse aspects and dimensions of DL research, practice, and literature, identifying trends and delineating research directions.
  17. Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992) 0.02
    0.02465278 = product of:
      0.03697917 = sum of:
        0.020708898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020708898 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
        0.016270269 = product of:
          0.032540537 = sum of:
            0.032540537 = weight(_text_:conference in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032540537 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.1675761 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
  18. Schwarz, C.: Natural language and information retrieval : Kommentierte Literaturliste zu Systemen, Verfahren und Tools (1986) 0.02
    0.024160381 = product of:
      0.07248114 = sum of:
        0.07248114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07248114 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Hawkins, D.T.: On-line information retrieval bibliography : 1965-1976 (1977) 0.02
    0.024160381 = product of:
      0.07248114 = sum of:
        0.07248114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07248114 = score(doc=5404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. McGill, M.J.; Huitfeldt, J.: Experimental techniques of information retrieval (1979) 0.02
    0.024160381 = product of:
      0.07248114 = sum of:
        0.07248114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07248114 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Authors

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 2
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • b 17
  • m 5
  • el 4
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…