-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.01
0.010747994 = product of:
0.042991977 = sum of:
0.042991977 = product of:
0.064487964 = sum of:
0.023303263 = weight(_text_:science in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023303263 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 40(2008) no.1, S.45-58
-
Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000)
0.01
0.00982812 = product of:
0.03931248 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002)
0.01
0.009795443 = product of:
0.039181773 = sum of:
0.039181773 = product of:
0.117545314 = sum of:
0.117545314 = weight(_text_:29 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117545314 = score(doc=3784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 8.2005 12:27:29
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.29-35
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000)
0.01
0.006926424 = product of:
0.027705695 = sum of:
0.027705695 = product of:
0.08311708 = sum of:
0.08311708 = weight(_text_:29 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08311708 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61
-
Broughton, V.: Organizing a national humanities portal : a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources (2002)
0.01
0.005936935 = product of:
0.02374774 = sum of:
0.02374774 = product of:
0.07124322 = sum of:
0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07124322 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:14:57
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The development of a common auxiliary schedule of property : a preliminary survey and proposal for its development (1998)
0.01
0.005936935 = product of:
0.02374774 = sum of:
0.02374774 = product of:
0.07124322 = sum of:
0.07124322 = weight(_text_:29 in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07124322 = score(doc=6410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 20(1998), S.27-29
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.005883528 = product of:
0.023534112 = sum of:
0.023534112 = product of:
0.070602335 = sum of:
0.070602335 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070602335 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a fundamental theory for structuring subject organization tools (2007)
0.00
0.0039579566 = product of:
0.015831826 = sum of:
0.015831826 = product of:
0.047495477 = sum of:
0.047495477 = weight(_text_:29 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047495477 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:21:29
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008)
0.00
0.0029684675 = product of:
0.01187387 = sum of:
0.01187387 = product of:
0.03562161 = sum of:
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 5.2008 19:11:29
-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.00
0.002941764 = product of:
0.011767056 = sum of:
0.011767056 = product of:
0.035301168 = sum of:
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.00
0.0024737231 = product of:
0.009894893 = sum of:
0.009894893 = product of:
0.029684676 = sum of:
0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029684676 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 6.2014 17:31:49
-
Broughton, V.: Science and knowledge organization : an editorial (2021)
0.00
0.0024025259 = product of:
0.009610103 = sum of:
0.009610103 = product of:
0.02883031 = sum of:
0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883031 = score(doc=593,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowledge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowledge organization systems to increase information and knowledge storage and retrieval performance.
- Footnote
- Editorial zu einem Special issue on 'Science and knowledge organization' mit längeren Überblicken zu wichtigen Begriffen der Wissensorgansiation.
-
Broughton, V.: Brian Vickery, September 11, 1918-October 17, 2009 (2011)
0.00
0.0022193585 = product of:
0.008877434 = sum of:
0.008877434 = product of:
0.0266323 = sum of:
0.0266323 = weight(_text_:science in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266323 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The article reviews the life and work of Brian Campbell Vickery, one of the major figures of British classification and information retrieval, and a scholar of international reputation. His career as librarian, researcher, and academic is described, as is the part he played in the development of information science theory in the twentieth century. Some of his most significant publications are listed, with reference to the scale and breadth of his published work overall.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020)
0.00
0.0016645187 = product of:
0.006658075 = sum of:
0.006658075 = product of:
0.019974224 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.
-
Broughton, V.: Concepts and terms in the faceted classification : the case of UDC (2010)
0.00
0.001387099 = product of:
0.005548396 = sum of:
0.005548396 = product of:
0.016645188 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Recent revision of UDC classes has aimed at implementing a more faceted approach. Many compound classes have been removed from the main tables, and more radical revisions of classes (particularly those for Medicine and Religion) have introduced a rigorous analysis, a clearer sense of citation order, and building of compound classes according to a more logical system syntax. The faceted approach provides a means of formalizing the relationships in the classification and making them explicit for machine recognition. In the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) (which has been a source for both UDC classes mentioned above), terminologies are encoded for automatic generation of hierarchical and associative relationships. Nevertheless, difficulties are encountered in vocabulary control, and a similar phenomenon is observed in UDC. Current work has revealed differences in the vocabulary of humanities and science, notably the way in which terms in the humanities should be handled when these are semantically complex. Achieving a balance between rigour in the structure of the classification and the complexity of natural language expression remains partially unresolved at present, but provides a fertile field for further research.
-
Broughton, V.: Essential thesaurus construction (2006)
0.00
5.548396E-4 = product of:
0.0022193585 = sum of:
0.0022193585 = product of:
0.006658075 = sum of:
0.006658075 = weight(_text_:science in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006658075 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.05820636 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Many information professionals working in small units today fail to find the published tools for subject-based organization that are appropriate to their local needs, whether they are archivists, special librarians, information officers, or knowledge or content managers. Large established standards for document description and organization are too unwieldy, unnecessarily detailed, or too expensive to install and maintain. In other cases the available systems are insufficient for a specialist environment, or don't bring things together in a helpful way. A purpose built, in-house system would seem to be the answer, but too often the skills necessary to create one are lacking. This practical text examines the criteria relevant to the selection of a subject-management system, describes the characteristics of some common types of subject tool, and takes the novice step by step through the process of creating a system for a specialist environment. The methodology employed is a standard technique for the building of a thesaurus that incidentally creates a compatible classification or taxonomy, both of which may be used in a variety of ways for document or information management. Key areas covered are: What is a thesaurus? Tools for subject access and retrieval; what a thesaurus is used for? Why use a thesaurus? Examples of thesauri; the structure of a thesaurus; thesaural relationships; practical thesaurus construction; the vocabulary of the thesaurus; building the systematic structure; conversion to alphabetic format; forms of entry in the thesaurus; maintaining the thesaurus; thesaurus software; and; the wider environment. Essential for the practising information professional, this guide is also valuable for students of library and information science.
