Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, W.G.; Stock, M.: Handbook of information science : a comprehensive handbook (2013) 0.04
    0.04195772 = product of:
      0.08391544 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
        0.044602968 = product of:
          0.06690445 = sum of:
            0.037219774 = weight(_text_:science in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037219774 = score(doc=2784,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
            0.029684676 = weight(_text_:29 in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029684676 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Dealing with information is one of the vital skills in the 21st century. It takes a fair degree of information savvy to create, represent and supply information as well as to search for and retrieve relevant knowledge. How does information (documents, pieces of knowledge) have to be organized in order to be retrievable? What role does metadata play? What are search engines on the Web, or in corporate intranets, and how do they work? How must one deal with natural language processing and tools of knowledge organization, such as thesauri, classification systems, and ontologies? How useful is social tagging? How valuable are intellectually created abstracts and automatically prepared extracts? Which empirical methods allow for user research and which for the evaluation of information systems? This Handbook is a basic work of information science, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of information retrieval and knowledge representation. It addresses readers from all professions and scientific disciplines, but particularly scholars, practitioners and students of Information Science, Library Science, Computer Science, Information Management, and Knowledge Management. This Handbook is a suitable reference work for Public and Academic Libraries.
    Date
    14.10.2013 19:29:54
  2. Stock, W.G.: Elektronische Informationsdienstleistungen und ihre Bedeutung für Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft (1995) 0.03
    0.025377143 = product of:
      0.050754286 = sum of:
        0.044476993 = weight(_text_:processing in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044476993 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.2530092 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.006277293 = product of:
          0.018831879 = sum of:
            0.018831879 = weight(_text_:science in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018831879 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Electronic data processing
    Science / Information services
    Subject
    Electronic data processing
    Science / Information services
  3. Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein allgemeiner Bibliotheksindex (1998) 0.02
    0.01965624 = product of:
      0.07862496 = sum of:
        0.07862496 = weight(_text_:processing in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07862496 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.4472613 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A general library index, produced as a series over years, would describe performance in the whole national system, showing increases and decreases compared with previous years. The index should cover input, processing and output and be modelled on the consumer price index. This will reflect service quality and quantity and users' reactions
  4. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02
    0.017652497 = product of:
      0.07060999 = sum of:
        0.07060999 = product of:
          0.10591498 = sum of:
            0.047079697 = weight(_text_:science in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047079697 = score(doc=613,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
            0.058835283 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058835283 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  5. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.011793743 = product of:
      0.04717497 = sum of:
        0.04717497 = weight(_text_:processing in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717497 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
  6. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.00982812 = product of:
      0.03931248 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
  7. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.01
    0.008826248 = product of:
      0.035304993 = sum of:
        0.035304993 = product of:
          0.05295749 = sum of:
            0.023539849 = weight(_text_:science in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023539849 = score(doc=4452,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
            0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029417641 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Informational cities are prototypical cities of the knowledge society. If they are informational world cities, they are new centers of power. According to Manuel Castells (1989), in those cities space of flows (flows of money, power, and information) tend to override space of places. Information and communication technology infrastructures, cognitive infrastructures (as groundwork of knowledge cities and creative cities), and city-level knowledge management are of great importance. Digital libraries provide access to the global explicit knowledge. The informational city consists of creative clusters and spaces for personal contacts to stimulate sharing of implicit information. In such cities, we can observe job polarization in favor of well-trained employees. The corporate structure of informational cities is made up of financial services, knowledge-intensive high-tech industrial enterprises, companies of the information economy, and further creative and knowledge-intensive service enterprises. Weak location factors are facilities for culture, recreational activities, and consumption. Political willingness to create an informational city and e-governance activities are crucial aspects for the development of such cities. This conceptual article frames indicators which are able to mark the degree of "informativeness" of a city. Finally, based upon findings of network economy, we try to explain why certain cities master the transition to informational cities and others (lagging to relative insignificance) do not. The article connects findings of information science and of urbanistics and urban planning.
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.963-986
  8. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.01
    0.007844705 = product of:
      0.03137882 = sum of:
        0.03137882 = product of:
          0.094136454 = sum of:
            0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094136454 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  9. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.01
    0.007844705 = product of:
      0.03137882 = sum of:
        0.03137882 = product of:
          0.094136454 = sum of:
            0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094136454 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  10. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.01
    0.007844705 = product of:
      0.03137882 = sum of:
        0.03137882 = product of:
          0.094136454 = sum of:
            0.094136454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094136454 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  11. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.01
    0.0068641165 = product of:
      0.027456466 = sum of:
        0.027456466 = product of:
          0.082369395 = sum of:
            0.082369395 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082369395 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  12. Stock, W.G.: Information Retrieval : Informationen suchen und finden (2007) 0.01
    0.0058968714 = product of:
      0.023587486 = sum of:
        0.023587486 = weight(_text_:processing in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023587486 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.13417839 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: - Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft Ziel der Buchreihe - Informationswissenschaft - Information und Wissen - Propädeutik des Information Retrieval Geschichte des Information Retrieval - Grundbegriffe des Information Retrieval - Relevanz und Pertinenz - Dokumente - Typologie von Retrievalsystemen - Architektur eines Retrievalsystems - Boolesche Retrievalsysteme Boolesches Retrieval - Informetrische Analysen - Erweitertes Boolesches Retrieval - Informationslinguistik - Natural Language Processing n-Gramme - Worte - Phrasen, Eigennamen, Komposita - Begriffe - Anaphora - Fehlertolerantes Retrieval - Klassische Retrievalmodelle Textstatistik - Vektorraummodell - Probabilistisches Modell - Web Information Retrieval Linktopologie - Strukturinformationen in Dokumenten - Nutzer und Nutzung - Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung - Spezialprobleme des Information Retrieval Soziale Netzwerke und "small worlds" - Kontrolliertes Vokabular - Sprachübergreifendes Retrieval - Anfragedialog - Retrieval von Textstellen - Bild- und Tonretrieval
  13. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.00
    0.0039223526 = product of:
      0.01568941 = sum of:
        0.01568941 = product of:
          0.047068227 = sum of:
            0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047068227 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  14. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.00
    0.003463212 = product of:
      0.013852848 = sum of:
        0.013852848 = product of:
          0.04155854 = sum of:
            0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04155854 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
  15. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.00
    0.0034320583 = product of:
      0.013728233 = sum of:
        0.013728233 = product of:
          0.041184697 = sum of:
            0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041184697 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  16. Kosior, A.; Barth, J.; Gremm, J.; Mainka, A.; Stock, W.G.: Imported expertise in world-class knowledge infrastructures : the problematic development of knowledge cities in the Gulf region (2015) 0.00
    0.0033290375 = product of:
      0.01331615 = sum of:
        0.01331615 = product of:
          0.03994845 = sum of:
            0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03994845 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 3(2015) no,3, 17-44
  17. Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999) 0.00
    0.0033290375 = product of:
      0.01331615 = sum of:
        0.01331615 = product of:
          0.03994845 = sum of:
            0.03994845 = weight(_text_:science in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03994845 = score(doc=3890,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das ISI in Philadelphia bündelt seine großen Zitationsdatenbanken und bietet sie (vorzugsweise als Intranet-, aber auch als Internetlösung) als 'Web of Science'an. Im derzeitigen entwicklungsstand geht 'Web of Science' bis in die 70er Jahre zurück und weist damit knapp 20 Mill. Quellenartikel mit darin enthaltenen rund 300 Mill. Zitationen in einer einzigen datenbank nach. Neben 'gewohnten' Suchstrategien etwa nach Sachthemen oder Namen werden zitationsanalytische Suchstrategien geboten: Recherchen nach zitierter Literatur, nach zitierenden Artikeln und nach (im Sinne gemeinsamer Fußnoten) 'verwandten' Artikeln. Die Ausgabefunktionen umfassen Document Delivery via ISI sowie Links zu Artikeln, die parallel zur Druckausgabe im WWW erscheinen. Durch die Multidisziplinarität der ISI-Datenbanken sind als Kundenkreis vor allem Einrichtungen angesprochen, die mehrere Wissenschaftsfächer berühren. Hochschulbibliotheken oder Bibliotheken großer Forschungseinrichtungen dürften am 'Web of Science' kaum vorbeikommen. Parallele Produkte bei Online-Archiven, auf CD-ROM oder als Druckausgabe verlieren an Bedeutung
    Object
    Web of Science
    Science Citation Index
  18. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.00
    0.0031016478 = product of:
      0.012406591 = sum of:
        0.012406591 = product of:
          0.037219774 = sum of:
            0.037219774 = weight(_text_:science in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037219774 = score(doc=474,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
    Object
    ISI Essential Science Indicators
  19. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Information markets : a strategic guideline for the i-commerce (2011) 0.00
    0.0028830315 = product of:
      0.011532126 = sum of:
        0.011532126 = product of:
          0.034596376 = sum of:
            0.034596376 = weight(_text_:science in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034596376 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information Markets is a compendium of the i-commerce, the commerce with digital information, content as well as software. Information Markets is a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of economic and information science endeavors on the markets of digital information. It provides a strategic guideline for information providers how to analyse their market environment and how to develop possible strategic actions. It is a book for information professionals, both for students of LIS (Library and Information Science), CIS (Computer and Information Science) or Information Management curricula and for practitioners as well as managers in these fields.
  20. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Theorie der Vorstellungsproduktion der Grazer Schule für die kognitive Wissenschaft (1989) 0.00
    0.0027463161 = product of:
      0.010985265 = sum of:
        0.010985265 = product of:
          0.03295579 = sum of:
            0.03295579 = weight(_text_:science in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295579 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The author stresses the need for a general, overall theory of cognitive psychological processes for cognitive science. The relevance of the Graz-school theorie on the 'production of ideas' is then examined as an attempt to provide such a framework. In Graz-school, at the beginning of 20th century, representation ('Vorstellung') was the foundational aspect of all the cognitive processes. As an example of an analysis of the origin of representation Stephan Witasek's theory of sensation is surveyed. The explanation of the origin of representations is also theoretically and practically important for cognitive science

Years

Languages

  • d 20
  • e 12

Types

Classifications