Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Tenopir, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Simmons, B.; Pollard, R.: Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks : affective and cognitive behaviors (2008) 0.02
    0.024461292 = product of:
      0.048922583 = sum of:
        0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03931248 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
        0.009610103 = product of:
          0.02883031 = sum of:
            0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883031 = score(doc=2027,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents part of phase 2 of a research project funded by the NSF-National Science Digital Library Project, which observed how academic users interact with the ScienceDirect information retrieval system for simulated class-related assignments. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve science and engineering students' use of science e-journal systems; (2) to develop methods to measure user interaction behaviors. Process-tracing technique recorded participants' processes and interaction behaviors that are measurable; think-aloud protocol captured participants' affective and cognitive verbalizations; pre- and post-search questionnaires solicited demographic information, prior experience with the system, and comments. We explored possible relationships between affective feelings and cognitive behaviors. During search interactions both feelings and thoughts occurred frequently. Positive feelings were more common and were associated more often with thoughts about results. Negative feelings were associated more often with thoughts related to the system, search strategy, and task. Learning styles are also examined as a factor influencing behavior. Engineering graduate students with an assimilating learning style searched longer and paused less than those with a converging learning style. Further exploration of learning styles is suggested.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.105-121
  2. Wang, P.; Hawk, W.B.; Tenopir, C.: Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources : an exploratory study using a holistic approach (2000) 0.02
    0.023587486 = product of:
      0.09434994 = sum of:
        0.09434994 = weight(_text_:processing in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09434994 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043425296 = queryNorm
            0.53671354 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.2, S.229-251
  3. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.01
    0.007677138 = product of:
      0.030708551 = sum of:
        0.030708551 = product of:
          0.046062827 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
            0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029417641 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.443-454
  4. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.00
    0.0024025259 = product of:
      0.009610103 = sum of:
        0.009610103 = product of:
          0.02883031 = sum of:
            0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883031 = score(doc=1960,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study assessed the intermix of local citation analysis and survey of journal use and reading patterns for evaluating an academic library's research collection. Journal articles and their cited references from faculties at the University of New South Wales were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) and journal impact factors from the Journal Citation Reports. The survey of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) academic staff asked both reader-related and reading-related questions. Both methods showed that academics in medicine published more and had more coauthors per paper than academics in the other faculties; however, when correlated with the number of students and academic staff, science published more and engineering published in higher impact journals. When recalled numbers of articles published were compared to actual numbers, all faculties over-estimated their productivity by nearly two-fold. The distribution of cited serial references was highly skewed with over half of the titles cited only once. The survey results corresponded with U.S. university surveys with one exception: Engineering academics reported the highest number of article readings and read mostly for research related activities. Citation analysis data showed that the UNSW library provided the majority of journals in which researchers published and cited, mostly in electronic formats. However, the availability of non-journal cited sources was low. The joint methods provided both confirmatory and contradictory results and proved useful in evaluating library research collections.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1393-1408
  5. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Edwards, S.; Wu, L.: Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns : the paradox of control (2009) 0.00
    0.0024025259 = product of:
      0.009610103 = sum of:
        0.009610103 = product of:
          0.02883031 = sum of:
            0.02883031 = weight(_text_:science in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02883031 = score(doc=2960,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - By tracking the information-seeking and reading patterns of science, technology, medical and social science faculty members from 1977 to the present, this paper seeks to examine how faculty members locate, obtain, read, and use scholarly articles and how this has changed with the widespread availability of electronic journals and journal alternatives. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using questionnaire surveys of university faculty and other researchers periodically since 1977. Many questions used the critical incident of the last article reading to allow analysis of the characteristics of readings in addition to characteristics of readers. Findings - The paper finds that the average number of readings per year per science faculty member continues to increase, while the average time spent per reading is decreasing. Electronic articles now account for the majority of readings, though most readings are still printed on paper for final reading. Scientists report reading a higher proportion of older articles from a wider range of journal titles and more articles from library e-collections. Articles are read for many purposes and readings are valuable to those purposes. Originality/value - The paper draws on data collected in a consistent way over 30 years. It provides a unique look at how electronic journals and other developments have influenced changes in reading behavior over three decades. The use of critical incidence provides evidence of the value of reading in addition to reading patterns.
  6. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.00
    0.0016645187 = product of:
      0.006658075 = sum of:
        0.006658075 = product of:
          0.019974224 = sum of:
            0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019974224 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.786-802
  7. Tenopir, C.: Online systems for information access and retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.0016645187 = product of:
      0.006658075 = sum of:
        0.006658075 = product of:
          0.019974224 = sum of:
            0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019974224 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
  8. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.00
    0.001387099 = product of:
      0.005548396 = sum of:
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1840-1851
  9. Sandusky, R.J.; Tenopir, C.: Finding and using journal-article components : impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice (2008) 0.00
    0.001387099 = product of:
      0.005548396 = sum of:
        0.005548396 = product of:
          0.016645188 = sum of:
            0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 1723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016645188 = score(doc=1723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043425296 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1723)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.970-982